A prospective multi-centre, open study of the safety and efficacy of hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc®) in patients with symptomatic ankle (talo-crural) osteoarthritis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2008.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hylan G-F 20 in patients with ankle osteoarthritis.

Methods

A prospective, open study in patients with symptomatic (≥50 mm and ≤90 mm on a 100 mm VAS) ankle osteoarthritis. Patients received 1 ml × 2 ml intra-articular injection of hylan G-F 20, plus an optional, second injection if pain remained at baseline levels after 1, 2 or 3 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in the pain VAS score at 3 months.

Results

Fifty-five patients received the first injection; 24 patients received a second. There were no serious or severe adverse events (AEs) related to the treatment. Seventeen patients experienced mild or moderate local, treatment-related AEs. The mean pain VAS score decreased from 68.0 mm (baseline) to 33.8 mm at 3 months (p < 0.001), which was maintained to 6 months (34.2 mm, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Hylan G-F 20 is well-tolerated and effective for up to 6 months in the treatment of symptomatic ankle osteoarthritis.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative disorder associated with joint pain and loss of joint function. It is the most common disease to affect synovial joints and is one of the most frequently occurring chronic conditions.

OA can affect any synovial joint but is most frequently found in the knee, hip and hand, and the majority of these patients present with primary (idiopathic) disease [1]. Reliable figures on the prevalence of OA in other joints are not readily available but estimates suggest that symptomatic ankle OA is found in <1% of the adult population [2]. In contrast to knee and hip OA, about 70% of patients with ankle OA present with secondary, post-traumatic disease [3]. As ankle trauma is often sports-related, patients suffering from OA are, on average, relatively young. Ankle OA can often prevent these young, otherwise healthy patients from working or participating in sports activities [3], [4].

The choice of treatment of ankle OA depends on the severity of the disease, the patient's age, medical and social history and the level of physical activity expected to be demanded of the joint.

A group that is difficult to treat are those patients suffering from milder, Grade II [5] ankle OA (joint space narrowing ≤50%). Although, usually, these patients are not yet surgical candidates, they are often relatively young and wish to be active without the burden of chronic pain medications with their associated adverse side-effects. Viscosupplementation (intra-articular supplementation of hyaluronic acid) could potentially provide a useful alternative in treating such patients with painful ankle OA.

Viscosupplementation is a well-established treatment option in knee OA and is included in the professional guidelines for treatment of the disease in this joint [6], [7]. The potential for treating osteoarthritis of the ankle joint by viscosupplementation has been suggested in the literature [8], [9]. Evidence for efficacy and safety in this setting is limited but two recent studies showed that five weekly HA injections in the ankle joint seem to be well-tolerated and can improve pain and function [10], [11].

Dosing in the ankle joint remains an area for discussion as no dosing studies have been published to date. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some clinicians simply follow the dosing regimen for knee OA, which varies from 3 to 5 weekly injections of 1–2 ml. However, published evidence on the use of hylan G-F 20 in hip OA shows that a single, 2 ml injection, with an optional second injection between 1 and 3 months after the first, can be safe and effective [12], [13].

The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single, 2 ml injection of hylan G-F 20, with an optional, second injection between 1 and 3 months after the first, in patients with symptomatic ankle (talo-crural) OA.

Section snippets

Trial design

This was a prospective, multi-centre, open study conducted in adult patients with symptomatic ankle OA between November 2003 and January 2006. To be considered symptomatic patients had to score ≥50 and ≤90 mm on the Ankle OA Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) (0–100 mm) at the baseline visit. Patients must have undergone at least 6 months of conservative treatment modalities (rest, physical therapy, NSAIDs etc.), and failed to achieve adequate symptomatic relief from these treatments, to be

Patients

Patient disposition for the study is shown in Fig. 1. The ITT population consisted of 55 patients. Fifty-one of the 55 patients (93%) completed the study. Baseline demographics for the ITT population are presented in Table 1. Patients were predominantly male (60%) and the mean age was 41 years.

Safety

Thirty-five patients (63.6%) experienced a total of 89 study ankle AEs during the study (Table 2). Of these, 17 patients (30.9%) experienced 28 treatment-related AEs of the study ankle. The majority

Discussion

Although osteoarthritis of the ankle occurs infrequently in the general population, it remains of major clinical significance due to the limitations that the disease places on the everyday activities of affected individuals. These patients could benefit from additional non-surgical treatment options if the need for subsequent surgical intervention could be delayed or negated.

The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the safety and efficacy (including duration of action) of

Conflict of interest statement

This study was sponsored by Genzyme Europe B.V. There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the writing assistance of Anna Porter, funded by Genzyme Europe B.V.

References (23)

  • J.A. Buckwalter et al.

    The impact of osteoarthritis

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2004)
  • J. Cushnaghan et al.

    Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1991)
  • C.L. Saltzman et al.

    Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopedic center

    Iowa Orthop J

    (2005)
  • J. Agel et al.

    Functional limitations of patients with end-stage ankle arthrosis

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2005)
  • C.N. van Dijk et al.

    A prospective study of prognostic factors concerning the outcome of arthroscopic surgery for anterior ankle impingement

    Am J Sports Med

    (1997)
  • American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines

    Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and the knee: 2000 update

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2000)
  • A. Pendleton et al.

    EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT)

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2000)
  • J.P. Pelletier et al.

    The pathophysiology of osteoarthritis and the implication of the use of hyaluronan and hylan as therapeutic agents in viscosupplementation

    J Rheumatol Suppl

    (1993)
  • C. Weiss et al.

    Musculoskeletal applications of hyaluronan and hylan. Potential uses in the foot and ankle

    Clin Podiatr Med Surg

    (1995)
  • R.S. Salk et al.

    Sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the ankle: a controlled, randomized, double-blind pilot study

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2006)
  • S.F. Sun et al.

    Efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle: a prospective study

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2006)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Effects and Safety of Intra-Articular Sodium Hyaluronate Injection for the Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Clinical Trial

      2022, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      DeGroot et al performed a single injection of low-molecular-weight HA and did not find any superiority of HA injection to saline solution injection (49). However, Witteveen et al reported that a single intra-articular injection of high-molecular-weight HA (2 mL Synvisc®; Wyeth) was well tolerated and effective in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis (50). A recent Cochrane review demonstrated the efficacy of intra-articular HA injection as a conservative treatment for symptomatic ankle arthritis.

    • Orthobiologics in Foot and Ankle Applications

      2020, Baxter’s The Foot And Ankle In Sport
    • Corticosteroids and Hyaluronic Acid Injections

      2019, Clinics in Sports Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text