Review
Results of simple excision technique in the surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular bones

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2007.12.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Accessory navicular bones might cause not only cosmetic problems but also be a reason of discomfort and pain. In case of inefficient conservative treatment symptomatic accessory naviculars are treated surgically.

Aim of paper: Presentation of results of simple excision of symptomatic accessory navicular.

Material and methods

Material consists of 22 patients (34 feet), 17 women and 5 men, treated surgically between 1992 and 2006. Mean age at surgery was 14.1 years (9–22 years). Accessory navicular type I was present in 5 feet (14.7%), type II in 17 (50%) and type III—in 12 (35.3%). Main symptom was localized pain on the medial arch of the foot, in the height of navicular bone. Surgery consisted of simple accessory navicular excision and if needed partial resection of navicular bone.

The mean follow-up period was 5.6 years (1–13 years). We analyzed: intensity of pain (VAS score system), daily and sport acitvity.

Subjective results were analyzed using a questionnaire.

Results

The questionnaire was returned from 21 patients: 9 patients had total pain relief, 11 considerable and one patient had persistent pain. Mean VAS results before surgery was 5.9 and 1.7 after surgery. Only one patient required analgesics occasionally. Complications were present in two patients (6.1%). All active patients returned to their sport activities.

Concluison

Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular by simple excision technique gives satisfying results, surgery is minimally traumatic and risk of complications low.

Introduction

Accessory ossicles derive from unfused accessory ossification centres, in most cases they are asymptomatic and are generally considered accidental radiological findings [1], [2]. Most common locations of accessory ossicles are foot and ankle and hand [3]. In the foot accessory naviculars are most frequent, with prevalence in radiological examination of 4–14% [4]. Familial occurrence of this defect was demonstrated, inheritance type is autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance [5].

On the basis of radiological findings three types of accessory navicular may be distinguished. Type I is an oval or round, well separated ossicle, size 2–6 mm, with no contact with proper navicular bone. It is embedded within distal portion of tibialis posterior tendon (os naviculare accessorium) (Fig. 1a and b). It comprises approximately 30% of all the accessory naviculars. Type II, the most frequent (50–60%) is separated from navicular bone by 1–2 mm of fibrocartilaginous synchondrosis (os naviculare bifurcatum, prehallux) (Fig. 2a and b). Type III, the least frequent (10–20%), is modified type II that has been incorporated to the navicular tuberosity (os naviculare cornutum) (Fig. 3a and b) [1], [6].

Presence of accessory navicular may be reason of pain and tenderness. They are called “symptomatic” accessory navicular. Pain is increased in stiff shoes like skiing boots, rollerblades, etc. Clinically main symptoms are tenderness on medial arch palpation in the navicular bone height [7].

Symptomatic accessory navicular may be treated conservatively–shoe modification, insoles, physiotherapy, local and oral anti-inflammatory agents; if no improvement is noticed surgical treatment is proposed.

Results of surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular using simple excision technique are presented and discussed.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Material consists of 22 patients; 17 women, 5 men; treated surgically between 1992 and 2006. Mean age in the group at time of surgery was 14.1 year (9–22 years). 34 procedures of accessory navicular removal were performed all together; 12 patients underwent bilateral surgery. In all cases the major clinical symptom was localized pain on the medial arch of the foot, in the height of navicular bone, no tenderness during palpation of tibialis tendon was present. Pain was intensified in stiff shoes

Results

Radiological type of accessory navicular in all cases was confirmed intraoperatively. Type I was present in 5 feet (14.7%), type II in 17 (50%) and type III in 12 feet (35.3%).

Wound healed typically in all cases. In 2 cases, patients with accessory navicular type III prolonged wound healing was noticed, oral antibiotics were prescribed. In 1 case scar hypertrophy was recorded, with no clinical symptoms. In all other feet the scar was linear, 2–3 cm long, no shoe conflict with the wound was

Discussion

Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular is known for years, in the 20ties of 20th century Kidner proposed a technique consisting of accessory navicular removal and main insertion of the tibialis tendon re-routing [8]. On the other extreme minimally invasive techniques like percutaneous drilling should be pointed out [9]. But still the most popular surgical technique is simple excision of the symptomatic accessory navicular with anatomical suture of the tibialis tendon if needed [2]

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (22)

  • The accessory navicular and its association with flatfoot

    2020, Fuss und Sprunggelenk
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another study confirmed a 34% improvement rate through conservative measures in the normal population which was reduced to 6.9% in athletes [20]. A number of retrospective studies have reported favorable results with satisfaction rates around 80% following the original Kidner procedure, i. e. excision of the painful accessory navicular and reattachment of the PTT into the navicular body [4,16,19,27,29,30,46,60]. Scott et al. [50] noted radiographic evidence of loss of the medial arch following a Kidner procedure in 3 of 10 patients with an average age of 25 years (range, 10 to 52) while Lee et al. [30] saw no loss of the medial arch in any of the 50 feet in their study with an average patient age of 17 years (range, 8 to 48).

  • Pediatric Problems and Rehabilitation Geared to the Young Athlete

    2020, Baxter’s The Foot And Ankle In Sport
  • Comparison of outcomes of osteosynthesis in type II accessory navicular by variable fixation methods

    2017, Foot and Ankle Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although the relationship between the presence of accessory navicular and the pes planovalgus is controversial, the Kidner procedure is commonly used to treat a symptomatic accessory navicular [3,14–17]. Other operative methods have been devised to treat symptomatic accessory naviculars, including simple excision, percutaneous drilling of the synchondrosis, and fusion [3,15,18–22]. Anatomically the main portion of tibialis posterior tendon inserts into navicular tuberosity and if accessory navicular is present, it serves as insertion for the tibialis posterior tendon and tibialis posterior tendon ended at the accessory navicular without continuity to primary navicular bone [11,12].

  • The Hindfoot Arch: What Role Does the Imager Play?

    2016, Radiologic Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Arthrodesis of the first tarsometatarsal joint and/or navicular-cuneiform are additional procedures used to correct pes planus deformities of the foot. In the presence of a painful accessory navicular (type II), simple resection of the os naviculare is the treatment of choice,92 which has also been the established treatment of other symptomatic accessory ossa in the musculoskeletal system; for example, an os trigonum or at the acromioclavicular joint (os acromiale).93,94 When patients present with stage IV deformity, additional procedures are warranted.

  • Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Treatment of the Foot and Ankle. What Is New and Current in Singapore.

    2016, Foot and Ankle Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    In cases of pain recalcitrant to conservative measures, surgery is a suitable alternative. Simple excision has been shown to produce satisfactory results, as has a modified Kidner procedure, which involves a reattachment of the posterior tibialis tendon.21,22 Arthrodesis of the accessory navicular bone has also been attempted.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text