ReviewResults of simple excision technique in the surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular bones
Introduction
Accessory ossicles derive from unfused accessory ossification centres, in most cases they are asymptomatic and are generally considered accidental radiological findings [1], [2]. Most common locations of accessory ossicles are foot and ankle and hand [3]. In the foot accessory naviculars are most frequent, with prevalence in radiological examination of 4–14% [4]. Familial occurrence of this defect was demonstrated, inheritance type is autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance [5].
On the basis of radiological findings three types of accessory navicular may be distinguished. Type I is an oval or round, well separated ossicle, size 2–6 mm, with no contact with proper navicular bone. It is embedded within distal portion of tibialis posterior tendon (os naviculare accessorium) (Fig. 1a and b). It comprises approximately 30% of all the accessory naviculars. Type II, the most frequent (50–60%) is separated from navicular bone by 1–2 mm of fibrocartilaginous synchondrosis (os naviculare bifurcatum, prehallux) (Fig. 2a and b). Type III, the least frequent (10–20%), is modified type II that has been incorporated to the navicular tuberosity (os naviculare cornutum) (Fig. 3a and b) [1], [6].
Presence of accessory navicular may be reason of pain and tenderness. They are called “symptomatic” accessory navicular. Pain is increased in stiff shoes like skiing boots, rollerblades, etc. Clinically main symptoms are tenderness on medial arch palpation in the navicular bone height [7].
Symptomatic accessory navicular may be treated conservatively–shoe modification, insoles, physiotherapy, local and oral anti-inflammatory agents; if no improvement is noticed surgical treatment is proposed.
Results of surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular using simple excision technique are presented and discussed.
Section snippets
Material and methods
Material consists of 22 patients; 17 women, 5 men; treated surgically between 1992 and 2006. Mean age in the group at time of surgery was 14.1 year (9–22 years). 34 procedures of accessory navicular removal were performed all together; 12 patients underwent bilateral surgery. In all cases the major clinical symptom was localized pain on the medial arch of the foot, in the height of navicular bone, no tenderness during palpation of tibialis tendon was present. Pain was intensified in stiff shoes
Results
Radiological type of accessory navicular in all cases was confirmed intraoperatively. Type I was present in 5 feet (14.7%), type II in 17 (50%) and type III in 12 feet (35.3%).
Wound healed typically in all cases. In 2 cases, patients with accessory navicular type III prolonged wound healing was noticed, oral antibiotics were prescribed. In 1 case scar hypertrophy was recorded, with no clinical symptoms. In all other feet the scar was linear, 2–3 cm long, no shoe conflict with the wound was
Discussion
Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular is known for years, in the 20ties of 20th century Kidner proposed a technique consisting of accessory navicular removal and main insertion of the tibialis tendon re-routing [8]. On the other extreme minimally invasive techniques like percutaneous drilling should be pointed out [9]. But still the most popular surgical technique is simple excision of the symptomatic accessory navicular with anatomical suture of the tibialis tendon if needed [2]
References (14)
- et al.
The accessory navicular—an important cause of medial foot pain
Clin Radiol
(1992) - et al.
Evaluation of simple excision in the treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular associated with flat feet
J Orthop Sci
(2000) - et al.
The painful accessory navicular
Skeletal Radiol
(1984) - et al.
Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular
J Pediatr Orthop
(1990) - et al.
Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis
Eur Radiol
(2003) The accessory scaphoid bone
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1925)- et al.
Inheritance of the accessory navicular bone
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
(2000)
Cited by (22)
The accessory navicular and its association with flatfoot
2020, Fuss und SprunggelenkCitation Excerpt :Another study confirmed a 34% improvement rate through conservative measures in the normal population which was reduced to 6.9% in athletes [20]. A number of retrospective studies have reported favorable results with satisfaction rates around 80% following the original Kidner procedure, i. e. excision of the painful accessory navicular and reattachment of the PTT into the navicular body [4,16,19,27,29,30,46,60]. Scott et al. [50] noted radiographic evidence of loss of the medial arch following a Kidner procedure in 3 of 10 patients with an average age of 25 years (range, 10 to 52) while Lee et al. [30] saw no loss of the medial arch in any of the 50 feet in their study with an average patient age of 17 years (range, 8 to 48).
Pediatric Problems and Rehabilitation Geared to the Young Athlete
2020, Baxter’s The Foot And Ankle In SportComparison of outcomes of osteosynthesis in type II accessory navicular by variable fixation methods
2017, Foot and Ankle SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Although the relationship between the presence of accessory navicular and the pes planovalgus is controversial, the Kidner procedure is commonly used to treat a symptomatic accessory navicular [3,14–17]. Other operative methods have been devised to treat symptomatic accessory naviculars, including simple excision, percutaneous drilling of the synchondrosis, and fusion [3,15,18–22]. Anatomically the main portion of tibialis posterior tendon inserts into navicular tuberosity and if accessory navicular is present, it serves as insertion for the tibialis posterior tendon and tibialis posterior tendon ended at the accessory navicular without continuity to primary navicular bone [11,12].
The Hindfoot Arch: What Role Does the Imager Play?
2016, Radiologic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Arthrodesis of the first tarsometatarsal joint and/or navicular-cuneiform are additional procedures used to correct pes planus deformities of the foot. In the presence of a painful accessory navicular (type II), simple resection of the os naviculare is the treatment of choice,92 which has also been the established treatment of other symptomatic accessory ossa in the musculoskeletal system; for example, an os trigonum or at the acromioclavicular joint (os acromiale).93,94 When patients present with stage IV deformity, additional procedures are warranted.
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Treatment of the Foot and Ankle. What Is New and Current in Singapore.
2016, Foot and Ankle ClinicsCitation Excerpt :In cases of pain recalcitrant to conservative measures, surgery is a suitable alternative. Simple excision has been shown to produce satisfactory results, as has a modified Kidner procedure, which involves a reattachment of the posterior tibialis tendon.21,22 Arthrodesis of the accessory navicular bone has also been attempted.
Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy with posterior tibial tendon reconstruction for the flexible flatfoot with symptomatic accessory navicular
2014, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery