Review
Modelling of the ankle joint complex. Reflections with regards to ankle prostheses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2004.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The goal of the present article is to provide a review and summary (2) of biomechanical research on the ankle joint, (3) ankle joint models, (4) ankle endoprostheses, and (5) reflections with respect to possible applications of ankle prosthesis design. Knowledge of the biomechanical function is essential for a successful design of a joint replacement for the ankle, which is highly complex. Presently, predictions of joint compressive forces are the primary basis for the design development of artificial total ankle replacements. Shear forces at the bone-to-implant interface, accountable for an increased loosening rate of the implant, are obviated with the so-called unconstrained design philosophy. However, the knowledge of transverse forces and shank torsional moments in conjunction with artificial ankle replacements and problems possibly related to these loads is rare. This review summarizes contributions of relevance with respect to the modelling of the ankle joints and a prosthetic replacement design and discusses some potentially important aspects for future ankle prostheses.

Introduction

The human ankle joint is a complex anatomical structure combining various mechanically coupled joints. Its motion results from an interplay of several articulating joint surfaces and restraining ligaments. In combination with the knee and hip joints it enables locomotion in various forms and transmits forces and moments during the foot-ground contact when the foot can be regarded as the interface of the human locomotor system with the environment. Malfunction or pain of the ankle joint leads to severe impairment of gait and consequently to a reduction of individual mobility. The clinical goal of replacing damaged ankles with artificial total joint replacements (arthroplasties) is to restore a fully functional locomotor system and to provide a recovering patient with the most possible and ideally unresented and painless mobility.

Biomechanical research on the ankle joint has a history which dates back almost 100 years, the most prominent investigators being Fick [1], Manter [2], Barnett and Napier [3], Hicks [4] and Isman and Inman [5], [6]. The work of all these authors concentrated on the general functional and anatomical description of the ankle. During the past decades, further work was also conducted on the human foot, as for example investigations that concentrated on some of the numerous joints within the foot, the load transmission from the shank to the heel and various parts of the forefoot, etc.

Besides biocompatibility issues and biological adaptation mechanisms of living tissues such as bone, ligaments and joint capsules, the development of a model that accurately describes the kinematics and predicts the kinetics of a joint involved in gait is very important for a proper design of a functional endoprosthesis (Andriacchi and Hurwitz [7]). Whereas the performance of artificial hip and knee joints may be regarded as satisfactory, this goal has not yet been attained to the same degree for the artificial ankle joint. The key role of the ankle being subjected to comparatively high loads during gait combined with its complexity legitimate an intensive research.

The goals of this article are to provide a review of the literature of ankle joint complex with a particular focus on:

  • 1.

    Summary of experimental biomechanical research on the ankle joint

  • 2.

    Summary of ankle joint models

  • 3.

    Summary of ankle endoprostheses

  • 4.

    Conclusions.

Section snippets

Historical Review (until 1976)

The list of anatomical and functional contributions on the human ankle joint is considerably large. This section summarizes early work until Inman's extensive investigations [6], which are frequently used as a reference. For the purpose of brevity, this part concentrates rather on functional than on descriptive publications, admitting that a distinction between the two is often not very simple.

Fick [1] (1911), one of the early authors of ankle biomechanics, considered the ankle to have one

Summary of ankle joint models

Next to the above discussed in vivo and in vitro experimental investigations of the ankle joint, a number of models to different degrees of complexity have been developed which also improved the understanding of ankle joint biomechanics. For a better understanding, this section is further divided into kinematic and kinetic modelling.

Summary of ankle endoprostheses

This chapter summarizes the current status of ankle endoprostheses design in the light of the previously discussed biomechanical research and model approaches of the ankle. It also addresses to clinical outcome studies and to the ongoing debate on the applicability of ankle replacements.

Komistek et al. [60] determined the ankle kinematics of 10 ankles after successful arthroplasties under weight bearing condition using dynamic video fluoroscopy and compared them with the unaffected ankles on

Conclusions

The summaries of chapter 1–3 show that the relevant question is whether ankle endoprostheses must be able to transmit torsional and/or transverse forces or not. However, the current state of the art does not answer this question.

  • If the answer to that question is yes (as it is the case in an unaffected ankle), the consequence of these transmitted forces would be an increased shear forces present at the implant-to-bone interface, with would increase the tendency of implant loosening. The coupling

References (125)

  • J. Apkarian et al.

    A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb

    J Biomech

    (1989)
  • M. Areblad et al.

    Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running

    J Biomech

    (1990)
  • T.M. Kepple et al.

    A video-based technique for measuring ankle-subtalar motion during stance

    J Biomed Eng

    (1990)
  • L. Moseley et al.

    Three-dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot during the stance phase of walking in normal young adult males

    Clin Biomech

    (1996)
  • R.D. Crowninshield et al.

    A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion

    J Biomech

    (1981)
  • A. Pedotti et al.

    Optimization of muscle-force sequencing in human locomotion

    Math Biosci

    (1978)
  • A.G. Patriarco et al.

    An evaluation of the approaches of optimization models in the prediction of muscle forces during human gait

    J Biomech

    (1981)
  • J.J. Collins

    The redundant nature of locomotor optimization laws

    J Biomech

    (1995)
  • J. Dul et al.

    Muscular synergism—I. On criteria for load sharing between synergistic muscles

    J Biomech

    (1984)
  • J. Dul et al.

    Muscular synergism—II. A minimum-fatigue criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles

    J Biomech

    (1984)
  • J.C. Bean et al.

    Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method

    J Biomech

    (1988)
  • W. Herzog et al.

    Validation of optimization models that estimate the forces exerted by synergistic muscles

    J Biomech

    (1991)
  • U. Glitsch et al.

    The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity

    J Biomech

    (1997)
  • S. Siegler et al.

    Passive and active components of the internal moment developed about the ankle joint during human ambulation

    J Biomech

    (1984)
  • P. Procter et al.

    Ankle joint biomechanics

    J Biomech

    (1982)
  • R. Helm et al.

    Long-term results of total ankle replacement

    J Arthroplasty

    (1986)
  • Å.S. Carlsson et al.

    A survival analysis of 52 Bath & Wessex ankle replacements: a clinical and radiographic study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a critical review of the literature

    Foot

    (1994)
  • S.M. Hay et al.

    Total ankle arthroplasty: a long-term review

    Foot

    (1994)
  • P.F. Rippstein

    Clinical experiences with three different designs of ankle prostheses

    Foot Ankle Clin N Am

    (2002)
  • K. Tillmann et al.

    Ergebnisse von OSG-Endoprothesen bei rheumatioder Arthritis

    FussSprungg

    (2003)
  • F.-W. Hagena et al.

    Die Endoprothese am oberen Sprunggelenk

    FussSprungg

    (2003)
  • T. Patsalis

    Die AES-Sprunggelenksprothese

    FussSprungg

    (2004)
  • P. Vienne et al.

    OSG-Totalendoprothese Agility

    FussSprungg

    (2004)
  • M. Weber et al.

    Erste Ergebnisse der SALTO-Sprunggelenkendoprothese

    FussSprungg

    (2004)
  • S. Giannini et al.

    Total ankle replacement: review of the designs and of the current status

    Foot Ankle Surg

    (2000)
  • R. Fick

    Handbuch der Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke: III, Spezielle Gelenk-und Muskelmechanik

    (1911)
  • J.T. Manter

    Movements of the subtalar and transverse tarsal joints

    Anat Rec

    (1941)
  • C.H. Barnett et al.

    The axis of rotation at the ankle joint in man. Its influence upon the form of the talus and the mobility of the fibula

    J Anat

    (1952)
  • J.H. Hicks

    The mechanics of the foot: I, the joints

    J Anat

    (1953)
  • R.E. Isman et al.

    Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle

    Bull Pros Res

    (1969)
  • V.T. Inman

    Inman's joints of the ankle

    (1976)
  • H. Elftman et al.

    The evolution of the human foot with especial reference to the joints

    J Anat

    (1935)
  • P.W. Lapidus

    Kinesiology and mechanical anatomy to the tarsal joints

    Clin Orthop

    (1963)
  • D.G. Wright et al.

    Action of the subtalar and ankle-joint complex during the stance phase of walking

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1964)
  • O. Rasmussen et al.

    Mobility of the ankle joint

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (1982)
  • J. Chen et al.

    The three-dimensional kinematics and flexibility characteristics of the human ankle and subtalar joints—part II: flexibility characteristics

    J Biomech Eng

    (1988)
  • E.J. van Langelaan

    A kinematical analysis of the tarsal joints: an X-Ray photogrammetric study. Dissertation

    Acta Orthop Scand, Copenhagen

    (1983)
  • S. Siegler et al.

    The three-dimensional kinematics and flexibility characteristics of the human ankle and subtalar joints—part I: kinematics

    J Biomech Eng

    (1988)
  • A. Lundberg et al.

    The axis of rotation of the ankle joint

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1989)
  • A. Lundberg et al.

    Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion

    Foot Ankle Int

    (1989)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Accurate detection mechanism synthesis and robot-assisted recognition method for ankle instantaneous motion

      2022, Mechanism and Machine Theory
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the rapid evolution of robotic technology and the rising demand for health care, robot-assisted rehabilitation research has gradually stepped into the high-precision stage. As the most complex weight-bearing joint of human [1–3], the ankle has a higher injury rate than others [4], and its robot-assisted precision rehabilitation is more valuable and challenging. Based on this background, the theoretical innovation of ankle rehabilitation robot has experienced three vital leaps, which extend from matching ankle degrees-of-freedom (DOF) [5–10] to adapting ankle motion center [11–17] and then to the latest matching ankle bone structure [18–22].

    • An image-based kinematic model of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and its application to gait analysis in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

      2019, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      This latter motion, despite its simplified appearance, is justified because the predominant motion occurs about a single axis of rotation (Scott and Winter, 1991). However, this DOF has been reported to be less accurately described with current musculoskeletal modelling approaches, mainly due to the difficulties in identifying the joint functional axis in vivo (Van den Bogert et al., 1994; Dettwyler et al., 2004; Parr et al., 2012). A high variability within- and between-subjects has been observed in the modelled joint axes, which is also related to the specific locomotion task (Leitch et al., 2010).

    • Musculoskeletal modelling of human ankle complex: Estimation of ankle joint moments

      2017, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      While complex models are unsuitable for dynamic simulation, they also fail to provide forces along the ankle ligaments, which is important for the research on ankle joint rehabilitation. Kinematics of the ankle complex has been studied in the past (Barnett and Napier, 1952; Lundberg et al., 1989) and while some models describe its motion as purely rotational (Engsberg, 1987; Demarais et al., 2002; Ying and Kim, 2005; Leardini et al., 1999), others consider foot motions to be a consequence of rotations about two hinge/revolute joints (biaxial) in series (Dettwyler et al., 2004; Apkarian et al., 1989; Dul and Johnson, 1985; Wright et al., 2000a, b; Scott and Winter, 1993; Delp et al., 2007; van den Bogert et al., 1994; Inman, 1976). Ankle complex kinematics have also been modelled using four-bar linkages and spatial parallel mechanisms (Leardini et al., 1999; Gregorio et al., 2007).

    • Fuzzy logic based adaptive admittance control of a redundantly actuated ankle rehabilitation robot

      2017, Control Engineering Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anatomic structure of the human ankle is required in addition to the knowledge of the common ankle rehabilitation protocols in order to develop an ankle rehabilitation robot. The human ankle is capable of performing three kinds of movements, i.e. plantar flexion/dorsiflexion, inversion/eversion, and adduction/abduction movements, through the ankle and subtalar joints in sagittal, frontal and transverse planes, respectively (Dettwyler, Stacoff, Kramers-de Quervain, & Stüssi, 2004). However, most ankle rehabilitation exercises are performed in frontal and sagittal planes (Mattacola & Dwyer, 2002; Payne, Berg, & Latin, 1997).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text