Elsevier

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volume 64, October 2017, Pages 78-84
Evaluation and Program Planning

Planning a mentorship initiative for foster parents: Does gender matter?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Planning models for mentorship programs are few, particularly in the area of foster parenting.

  • Existing literature suggest gender differences in the way individuals conceptualize and experience mentor programs.

  • This study utilized multi-dimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis with fpster parents to conceptualize planning an effective mentor program.

  • Results yielded s seven-cluster planning framework; no significant gender differences were detected in priority ratings for the conceptualization.

Abstract

Despite the use of mentoring programs in fields such as business, career training, and youth development, little is known about how mentoring can be used to train and support new foster parents. This paper describes how Concept Mapping was used with current foster parents to develop a conceptual framework suitable to plan a foster parent mentor program. A secondary aim of this study was to explore priority differences in the conceptualization by self-reported gender (foster mothers vs. foster fathers). Participant data was collected via three qualitative brainstorming sessions, and analyzed using non-metric multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis. Findings indicate that foster parents participating in this study conceptualized effective mentor programs via a seven cluster solution. Study results also showed no significant differences in cluster ratings by gender. Implications for practice and program planning are identified, as well as areas for future research.

Introduction

Foster parents are tasked with caring for society’s most vulnerable children. In order to support foster parents in this endeavor, public (e.g., local and state governments) and private (e.g., private child welfare service providers) entities are looking for ways to support foster parents charged with caring for maltreated young people. One way this support has manifested itself is through the propagation of mentor initiatives that support both caregivers and the children in foster care (e.g., Cohen & Canan, 2006; Rhodes, Haight, & Briggs, 1999; Weinberger, 2014). Despite the acknowledgement that mentorship programs can support permanency and placement outcomes for children, the literature is devoid of research related to the use of mentoring for foster parents. Further, there is nominal research that examines differential planning processes for supporting foster parents through mentoring relationships. This paper seeks to uniquely address these limitations.

The purpose of this exploratory research was to examine foster parent (N = 59) perceptions related to conceptualizing a framework necessary to plan a foster parent mentor program. Additionally, this study examined priority differences in the conceptualization, by self-reported gender (i.e., foster mothers vs foster fathers). To achieve these aims, researchers employed a mixed method approach that analyzes qualitative data via quantitative device, specifically non-metric multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses. Through these analyses, illustrative visual depictions of participant data are computed. After a terse review of literature, this paper will outline methodological processes undertaken for this study, explicate results, and discuss lessons learned for future programmatic development and evaluation endeavors for mentorship programs.

Section snippets

Background

In general, mentorship programs are designed to support learning and development of skills (Breipohl & Hamburg, 2011) and seen as a way to improve quality and retention. Mentoring has been used in a variety of ways including helping youth transition to adolescence by pairing them with a nonparental adult (Spencer, 2007; Zimmerman, Bingenheimer, & Notaro, 2002) and supporting the career development of underrepresented minority groups in science and math through mentorship (San Miguel & Kim, 2015

Method

To answer the research questions posited above, researchers employed Concept Mapping (CM) methodology. CM is an iterative, participatory, mixed-method research methodology that pairs non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) with hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). CM is a research approach process often utilized to delineate conceptual structures around a focused area of study (Anderson, Day, & Vandenburg, 2011). Several researchers (e.g., Burke et al., 2005, Haque and Rosas, 2010, Rosas, 2005

Participants

Fifty-nine participants took part in brainstorming and statement structuring activities for this study. All participants were foster parents residing in one southeastern state. The typical participant identified as female (n = 35), Caucasian/White (n = 54), African-American/Black (n = 3), or Biracial/Multiracial (n = 2), was aged 39.53 (SD = 10.37) years, and had been a foster parent for approximately 4.4 months (SD = 2.4 months). In terms of educational background (highest obtained), 17 participants

Discussion

The purposes of this study were two-fold. First, this study was to explicate a conceptual framework for planning and developing foster parent mentor programs. Second, this work examined priority differences, in terms of importance and feasibility, of this conceptualization, by gender. Both of these purposes contribute to addressing limitations in the current literature. The following paragraphs outline prominent discussion points congruent with answering the research questions posited above.

Conclusion

While mentoring is an effective way to support new members and promote skill development and retention, little is known in the literature about the role of mentoring with foster parents. This research study sought to explore how foster parents conceptualized mentorship as well as if there were differences in perceptions by gender. Foster parents of both identified genders were fairly consistent in prioritizing areas of conceptualization and feasibility which deviates somewhat from literature in

References (54)

  • W. Breipohl et al.

    Mentoring and diversity coaching on the job.

    Lifelong learning for competitiveness, employability and social inclusion: International conference. 2111, 42–47

    (2011)
  • J. Brown

    Foster parents’ perceptions of factors needed for successful foster placements

    Journal of Child and Family Studies

    (2008)
  • J.G. Burke et al.

    An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method

    Qualitative Health Research

    (2005)
  • G.T. Chao

    Invited reaction: Challenging research in mentoring

    Human Resource Development Quarterly

    (1998)
  • E. Cohen et al.

    Closer to home: Parent mentors in child welfare

    Child Welfare

    (2006)
  • A.C. D’Andrade

    Placement stability in foster care

  • T.L. Eby et al.

    Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals

    Journal of Vocational Behavior

    (2008)
  • H.F. Ezell et al.

    An empirical inquiry of variables impacting women in management in public social service organizations

    Administration in Social Work

    (1981)
  • L.W. Fitt et al.

    When the mentor is a man and the protege a woman

    Harvard Business Review

    (1981)
  • J.L. Fowler et al.

    The relationship between mentee-mentor gender combination and the provision of distinct mentoring functions

    Women in Management Review

    (2007)
  • L.R. Gaskill

    Same-sex and cross-sex mentoring of female protégés: A comparative analysis

    The Career Development Quarterly

    (1991)
  • N. Haque et al.

    Concept mapping of photovoices: Sequencing and integrating methods to understand immigrants' perceptions of neighborhood influences on health

    Family & Community Health

    (2010)
  • P. Kalbfleisch

    Communicating in mentoring relationships: A theory for enactment

    Communication Theory

    (2002)
  • M. Kane et al.

    Concept mapping for planning and evaluation

    (2007)
  • M.J. Karcher et al.

    Mentoring programs: A framework to inform program development, research, and evaluation

    Journal of Community Psychology

    (2006)
  • K. Kippendorf

    Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology

    (2004)
  • K.E. Kram et al.

    Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development

    The Academy of Management Journal

    (1985)
  • View full text