Factors associated with retention of drug abusing women in long-term residential treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.010Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examines factors associated with retention at 50 projects funded by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, in the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, under its Residential Women and Children and Pregnant and Postpartum Women (RWC/PPW) Demonstration Program. These programs provided long-term, intensive residential treatment for pregnant and parenting women and their children. Data for this study were collected from 3265 clients from 24 six-month and 26 twelve-month RWC/PPW projects, admitted to and discharged from treatment between January 1, 1995 and March 31, 2001. Results from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model indicate that, for both 6- and 12-month projects, significant predictors of retention include: bringing children into treatment, age, and coercion (either through CJS or CPS actions). In six-month projects, longer LOS was also associated with frequency of client–counselor contact, as well as with pregnancy status. Taken together, these findings suggest that enabling parenting women to remain together with their children during residential treatment is an important key to achieving the extended period of stay needed to accomplish treatment objectives.

Introduction

Retention—keeping clients in treatment long enough for them to achieve their treatment goals—is a major challenge for substance abuse treatment programs (Hser, Anglin, & Liu, 1990). Substance abuse treatment research has consistently found strong associations between client length of stay (LOS) in treatment and posttreatment outcomes, including decreased drug use, decreased involvement in criminal activities, and increased employment (Anglin and Hser, 1991, Gerstein and Harwood, 1990). However, the reality of drug treatment is that retention and completion rates are often quite low; completion rates of 50% or less are common across various treatment modalities (Copeland and Hall, 1992, Mammo and Weinbaum, 1993).

A good deal of past research has examined relationships between client characteristics and treatment LOS. A number of studies have found LOS and treatment completion to be positively correlated with age in programs serving women (Bell et al., 1997, Lewis et al., 1997, Scully, 1997). Other client factors consistently associated with longer LOS are higher education level (Bell et al., 1994, Knight et al., 2001) and higher motivation for treatment (Anglin and Hser, 1991, SAS Institute, 2001). Higher education level has also been linked to treatment completion (Brindis, Clayson, & Berkowitz, 1997). A recent study by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) found that age, education, employment, and legal supervision were all related to longer LOS, while severe drug use consistently predicted shorter LOS (Hser, Maglione, Joshi, & Chao, 1998).

Recent literature suggests that psychological dysfunction is related to shorter LOS in treatment. Simpson et al. (1997), in analyzing data from the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS), found that individuals with psychological dysfunction paired with heavy cocaine and alcohol use had comparatively short LOS. Depression and anti-social personality disorder have also been shown to be associated with comparatively short LOS in drug treatment among women (Haller et al., 1997, Williams and Roberts, 1991). Depression may also reduce the likelihood of completing treatment (Williams & Roberts, 1991).

Factors predictive of retention in treatment that are specific to female drug abusers have not been clearly identified. Several studies have reported that pregnancy status and trimester of pregnancy at treatment admission are associated with retention (Grella, Joshi, & Hser, 2000); however, findings on these subjects have been inconsistent. Haller, Elswick, Dawson, Knisely, and Schnoll (1992) reported that women who entered treatment in their third trimester of pregnancy stayed longer than women who entered during the second trimester or those who entered during the postpartum period. Conversely, Schnoll (1994) reported that women who entered treatment in the first trimester stayed in treatment longer than women who entered during the second or third trimester. Wald (1992) reported a 20% completion rate overall among pregnant clients.

Some client characteristics have not been consistently associated with treatment retention or completion. For example, African–American and Hispanic women have been found in some studies to have comparatively short average LOS in long-term treatment (Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1997, McCaul et al., 2001); others have found race/ethnicity unrelated to retention (Hser et al., 1998). Among women, it is also unclear whether a legal mandate to attend substance abuse treatment programs leads to longer stays in such programs, although the majority of studies have found that women who are legally mandated to attend treatment tend to stay longer than women who enter treatment voluntarily (Brindis et al., 1997, Knight et al., 2001, Lewis et al., 1997, Wald, 1992, Williams and Roberts, 1991). Finally, research examining primary drug of choice, severity of drug use, and prior treatment history have produced inconsistent findings as to these variables' associations with retention (Brindis et al., 1997, Scully, 1997, Simpson et al., 1997).

Although program characteristics have not been studied as extensively as client characteristics, several studies have examined program factors that may affect retention of women clients. Several studies have found that residential programs that allowed women to bring children into treatment had significantly higher retention rates than programs that did not allow children (Coletti et al., 1992, Hughes et al., 1995, Szuster et al., 1996). Similar findings were reported by Metsch et al. (2001), who compared retention rates between women who entered treatment with children and those who did not.

Hser et al. (1998) found several program-level factors statistically associated with retention, including provision of case management services, availability of vocational training, and engagement of clients in the development of treatment plans. Other variables that have been linked with longer LOS are a short waiting list for admission (Lewis et al., 1997), greater intensity of treatment as measured by the number of hours in treatment related activities (Hoffman et al., 1994, Strantz and Welch, 1995), family involvement in the treatment process (Stanton, 1997), and high clinical staff/client ratios and small caseloads (Stark, 1990).

The present study extends the body of research described above by examining factors associated with retention at a distinctive set of residential substance abuse treatment facilities. The data are derived from projects funded by CSAT, in the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, under its Residential Women and Children (RWC) and Pregnant and Postpartum Women (PPW) demonstration programs (CSAT, 2001). In fiscal years 1993–1995, CSAT awarded 50 5–6 year grants under these programs to support development of facilities providing long-term residential substance abuse treatment for pregnant and parenting women (Clark, 2001). Each RWC/PPW project, while having the latitude to develop its own unique treatment model and philosophy, was required to meet specified service requirements, to develop programming for either a six-month or 12-month planned length of stay (Ns=24 and 26 projects, respectively), and to focus either on pregnant and postpartum women (postpartum meaning having given birth within the past 12 months) or on women with children over one year of age stay (Ns=24 and 26 projects, respectively). This paper examines retention (LOS) patterns in this program and factors affecting LOS.

Section snippets

Data collection

As a condition of their funding, all 50 RWC/PPW projects participated in a CSAT-sponsored cross-site study designed to assemble a standard set of information about all projects and clients in the program. Project-level data were assembled from project proposals, annual reports, and related documentation, together with information gathered from administrative and clinical staff in site visits to each project. Client data were compiled using a cross-site data collection system designed to

Client characteristics

The two groups of projects had generally similar client profiles, although there were statistically significant differences (Table 1). Most clients (over 70% in both six-month and 12-month projects) were African American or Caucasian. Less than 50% completed high school. Approximately one-fifth of the clients in six-month projects were pregnant at treatment admission, compared to almost one-third of the clients in 12-month projects. Almost three-quarters of the clients in six-month projects

Discussion

This study initially examined retention patterns at substance abuse treatment projects structured around six-month and 12-month planned lengths of stay. The two sets of projects had highly overlapping and generally similar LOS distributions. Both had an initial drop-out peak at about 20 days, followed by gradual attrition over the next 8 or 9 months. Both groups of projects permitted stays beyond their respective planning targets. Some clients at six-month projects stayed up to nine months, and

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the many RWC/PPW project staff and administrators who assembled the data reported here. This study was supported with grants and contracts from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Views and opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of CSAT, SAMHSA or DHHS.

References (33)

  • K. Bell et al.

    Predicting length of stay of substance-using pregnant and postpartum women in day treatment

    Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

    (1997)
  • D. Haller et al.

    Perinatal substance abusers: factors influencing treatment retention

    Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

    (1997)
  • M. McCaul et al.

    Predictors of outpatient treatment retention: patient versus substance use characteristics

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2001)
  • M.D. Anglin et al.

    Criminal justice and the drug abusing offender: policy issues of coerced treatment

    Behavioral Sciences and Law

    (1991)
  • D. Bell et al.

    An experimental test of retention in residential and outpatient programs

    American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

    (1994)
  • C. Brindis et al.

    Options for recovery: California's perinatal projects

    Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

    (1997)
  • The national treatment improvement evaluation study: Retention analysis

    (1997)
  • Telling their stories: Reflections of the 11 original grantees that piloted residential treatment for women and children for CSAT

    (2001)
  • H.W. Clark

    Residential substance abuse treatment for pregnant and postpartum women and their children: Treatment and policy implications

    Child Welfare

    (2001)
  • S. Coletti et al.

    PAR village: specialized intervention for cocaine abusing women and their children

    Journal of the Florida Medical Association

    (1992)
  • J. Copeland et al.

    A comparison of predictors of treatment drop-out of women seeking drug and alcohol treatment in a specialist women's and two traditional mixed sex treatment services

    British Journal of Addiction

    (1992)
  • D. Gerstein et al.

    Treating drug problems: Vol. 1. A study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drug treatment systems

    (1990)
  • C.E. Grella et al.

    Program variation in treatment outcomes among women in residential drug treatment

    Evaluation Review

    (2000)
  • D. Haller et al.

    Retention in treatment of perinatal substance abusers

  • J. Hoffman et al.

    Comparative cocaine treatment strategies: enhancing client retention and treatment exposure

    Journal of Addictive Diseases

    (1994)
  • S. Holm

    A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure

    Scandivania Journal of Statisics

    (1979)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Women with a substance use disorder: Treatment completion, pregnancy, and compulsory treatment

      2020, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      As mentioned, there are few studies that examine coercive SUD treatment among pregnant women. Existing research generally finds that external pressure to complete treatment through coercion generally coalesces through court referrals, community supervision, and child protective services (Chen et al., 2004; Nishimoto & Roberts, 2001; Ondersma et al., 2010 ; Staudt, 2018). Coercion to complete treatment usually comes from the criminal justice system and carries the penalty of imprisonment if women fail to complete treatment programs, or conversely, the termination of child custody.

    • Two- and three-year follow-up from a gender-specific, web-based drug abuse prevention program for adolescent girls

      2019, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our intervention, therefore, addressed girls' general and gender-specific risk factors for drug use. Support for the use of gender-specific programming is evident in such fields as HIV prevention (Wechsberg et al., 2015), health education (LeCroy, Cosgrove, Cotter, & Fordney, 2018), behavioral and cognitive psychology (Belgrave, Chase-Vaughn, Gray, Addison, & Cherry, 2000; McCabe, Connaughton, Tatangelo, Mellor, & Busija, 2017), criminal justice (Wakai, Sampl, Hilton, & Ligon, 2014), and drug abuse treatment (Chen et al., 2004; Saxena, Messina, & Grella, 2014). Yet, despite decades of evidence noting gender differences in drug use rates, risk factors, and sequelae of use, prevention interventions tailored for adolescent girls remain in short supply (Kumpfer, Smith, & Summerhays, 2008).

    • Parenting self-efficacy and empowerment among expectant mothers with substance use disorders

      2017, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This may be particularly true for women in their first trimester. Chen et al. (2004) found that women who entered treatment late in their pregnancies had better retention rates than women who entered treatment in their first trimester, with the latter prematurely leaving treatment (Chen et al., 2004). The provision of specialized interdisciplinary antenatal services holds the potential to address these barriers (Morris et al., 2012).

    • Treatment outcomes for substance use disorder among women of reproductive age in Massachusetts: A population-based approach

      2015, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Women also have a higher prevalence of mental health disorders and experiences of victimization (Pinchevsky et al., 2013), and more health and social consequences (Bradley et al., 1998), yet face specific barriers to treatment entry (Greenfield et al., 2007). Commonly encountered obstacles for women of reproductive age include unavailability of services for pregnant women, lack of child care, and fear of losing custody of children (Chen, 2004; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2004; Zilberman et al., 2003). SUD among women of reproductive age affects the health of women, their children, their larger family circles and their communities (Fox et al., 2013).

    • Substance abuse treatment services for pregnant women: Psychosocial and behavioral approaches

      2014, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Education about breastfeeding and strong support for mothers who nurse their babies, unless they are HIV positive Research suggests that women become more engaged, obtain greater benefit from treatment, and have higher retention when they are permitted to bring their children into the residential treatment setting.113–117 Women in residential treatment with their children have better outcomes across multiple areas of psychosocial functioning at 6 months after discharge (ie, drug abstinence, employment, child custody, and involvement with continuing care and support groups) than women who do not bring their children to treatment.118

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text