Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.002Get rights and content

Abstract

This article presents an informed definition of sustainability and an associated planning model for sustaining innovations (pertinent to both infrastructure and interventions) within organizational, community, and state systems. The planning model stems from a systematic review of the literature and from concepts derived from a series of ‘think tanks’ made up of key substance abuse prevention professionals. The model assumes a five-step process (i.e. assessment, development, implementation, evaluation, and reassessment/modification) and addresses factors known to inhibit efforts to sustain an innovation. One set of factors concerns the capacity of prevention systems to support sustainable innovations. The other pertains to the extent to which a particular innovation is sustainable. A sustainability action strategy is presented that includes goals with corresponding sets of objectives, actions, and results that determine the extent of readiness to sustain an innovation. Sustainability tools to assist in implementing the planning model are illustrated, and next steps for the model are discussed. This planning model provides a conceptual and practical understanding of sustainability that can lead to further investigation.

Introduction

Over the past three decades, considerable resources have been spent in the United States and other countries to implement and validate innovative prevention programs and strategies. For example, science-based substance abuse prevention innovations that include school-based programs (Tobler & Stratton, 1997), family-based programs (Johnson et al., 1998, Kumpfer, 1997), and environmental strategies (Holder, 2001, Gruenewald et al., 2001) are now available for replication. Other health promotion programs have attained prominence in addressing threats concerning cancer (Kaluzny, Schenck, & Ricketts, 1986), heart disease (Bracht et al., 1994), mental health (Glaser and Backer, 1980, Murphy, 1981), and oral health issues (Silversin, Coombs, & Drolette, 1980). Also, increasingly available for implementation are growing numbers of violence prevention programs (Derzon, Wilson, & Cunningham, 1999).

Often designed as demonstrations or community trials, prevention innovations have focused primarily on successful implementation without creating as well assurances of ‘life of innovations’ after extramural funding has ended (Akerlund, 2000, Goodman et al., 1993, Green, 1989, Shediec-Rizkallah and Bone, 1998, Vaughn et al., 2000). Given this problem, there is a general consensus that sustainability guidance is essential (Backer, 2000, Goodman and Steckler, 1989). In response, this article presents a planning model for sustaining prevention innovations designed for organizational, community, and state prevention systems.

The impetus for developing this sustainability planning model comes from a critical need in the substance abuse prevention field, and it was precipitated by a federal initiative, the State Incentive Grant (SIG) program funded by the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). From 1997 to 2002, a series of three-year grants totaling $9 million each have been given to a large majority of the states to fund these goals: (1) promote systems change in state and local prevention systems and (2) implement and evaluate science-based prevention programs and/or strategies (CSAP, 2002). Although states agreed to a variety of CSAP conditions, one of which was to consider sustaining effective systemic changes and prevention interventions after federal funding ended, only a limited number of planning strategies and tools are yet available for grantees to use in making sustainability decisions. The sustainability model presented here stems from a systematic literature synthesis and information that emerged from a series of ‘think tanks’ involving key substance abuse prevention professionals who are affiliated with CSAPs Southeast Center for the Application of Prevention Technology (CAPT). Although this model has been developed in the substance abuse prevention field, we believe it can be generalized to other prevention areas.

First, we discuss the literature about sustainability and related terms. Second, we present a prevention-focused sustainability-planning model that highlights key factors relating to sustaining innovations and how to deal with them. Third, we discuss lessons learned and future steps for the model. This planning model is being presented to provide the impetus for further empirical investigation relating to the sustainability of prevention innovations.

Section snippets

Sustainability in perspective

Decision-makers involved in implementing an innovation must face the ultimate challenge of planning for the time when the implementation phase is completed. Clearly, not all innovations need to be continued because circumstances, people, situations, and problems change (Bracht et al., 1994, Glaser, 1981). Further, an effectiveness evaluation may find that an innovation does not work outside of specific controlled conditions. Nevertheless, the continuation of an innovation must become a primary

Defining sustainability

From the list of 11 terms in the literature that defined the process of continuing an innovation beyond a trial or demonstration period, we selected sustainability as the overarching construct that is broad enough to incorporate the essential elements of the other constructs, especially institutionalization. Shediac-Rizkallah and Bone (1998) categorized existing definitions in the literature into three categories that address these issues: (a) maintaining benefits achieved through an initial

A sustainability planning model: a micro view

A micro view of our sustainability planning model is presented in Table 1, Table 2, which follows a standard planning sequence (Cooksy et al., 2001, Wholey, 1979). First, the two sets of factors (infrastructure capacity-building and sustainable innovation attributes) that are assumed to be causally associated with sustainability in our intervention theory are presented in column one of Table 1, Table 2, respectively. Second, based on our sustainability definition, two goals are formulated, each

Summary, lessons learned, and next steps

We present a prototype planning model for sustaining innovations (infrastructure and interventions) within organizational, community, and state systems that provide prevention services. This planning model stems from a systematic literature review and from a series of ‘think tanks’ consisting of key substance abuse prevention professionals. We define sustainability as ‘the process of ensuring an adaptive prevention system and a sustainable innovation that can be integrated into ongoing

Acknowledgements

We extend grateful appreciation to each member of the Southeast CAPT's Think Tanks for their insightful perspectives and practical guidance; each Director of CSAP's five other regional CAPTs for their prompt review and willingness to assist in diffusion of the model; CSAP Project Officers Jon Rolf and Dave Robbins for their guidance, support and encouragement; Abe Wandersman, Chris Ringwalt, and Charline McCord for their prompt and insightful review; and Chris Bayer for his assistance in

References (95)

  • D.G Altman

    Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities

    Health Psychology

    (1995)
  • T.E Backer

    The failure of success: challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse prevention programs

    Journal of Community Psychology

    (2000)
  • T.E Backer

    Finding the balance: Program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention

    (2001)
  • S.A Barab et al.

    Measurement characteristics of the levels of institutionalization scales: examining reliability and validity

    Journal of Nursing Measurements

    (1998)
  • L.J Bauman et al.

    Reinventing fidelity: the transfer of social technology among settings

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (1991)
  • C Beuermann et al.

    The sustainability transition in Germany: some early stage experiences

    Environmental Politics

    (1997)
  • J.M Beyer et al.
    (1978)
  • L Bickman

    Advances in program theory

    (1987)
  • L Bickman
    (1990)
  • N Bracht et al.

    Community ownership and program continuation following a health demonstration project

    Health Education Research

    (1994)
  • J.S Brekke

    The model-guided method for monitoring program implementation

    Evaluation Review

    (1987)
  • P.F Buller et al.

    Determinants of planned organizational change

    Group and Organization Studies

    (1989)
  • F.D Butterfoss et al.

    CINCH: an urban coalition for empowerment and action

    Health Education and Behavior

    (1998)
  • R.J Calsyn et al.

    The appropriateness of adaptation in the transfer of innovations-incomplete adoption of an innovation: the case of goal attainment scaling

    Evaluation

    (1977)
  • R.J Chaskin

    Building community capacity: a definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative

    Urban Affairs Review

    (2001)
  • H.T Chen
    (1990)
  • C Colbeck

    Assessing institutionalization of curricular and pedagogical reforms

    Research in Higher Education

    (2002)
  • (2002)
  • J.H Derzon et al.
    (1999)
  • P.F Drucker
    (1990)
  • R.W Edwards et al.

    Community readiness: Research to practice

    Journal of Community Psychology

    (2000)
  • Edwards, S.L., Stern, R.F., (1998). Building and sustaining community partnerships for teen pregnancy prevention....
  • A Farrell

    Sustainability and decision-making: The EPA's sustainable development challenge grant program

    Policy Studies Review

    (1999)
  • S.B Fawcett et al.

    The community tool box: An internet-based resource for building healthier communities

    Public Health Reports

    (2000)
  • P.G Foster-Fishman et al.

    Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (2001)
  • R Gersten et al.

    Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (2000)
  • R Gersten et al.

    What we know about using research findings: implications for improving special education practice

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (1997)
  • E.M Glaser

    Durability of innovations in human service organizations: A case study analysis

    Knowledge: Creation, diffusion, utilization

    (1981)
  • E.M Glaser et al.

    Durability of innovations: how goal attainment scaling programs fare over time

    Community Mental Health Journal

    (1980)
  • R.M Goodman

    Bridging the gap in effective program implementation: from concept to application

    Journal of Community Psychology

    (2000)
  • R.M Goodman et al.

    The life and death of a health promotion program: an institutionalization case study

    International Quarterly of Community Health Education

    (1987)
  • R.M Goodman et al.

    A framework for assessing program institutionalization

    Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer

    (1989)
  • R.M Goodman et al.

    Development of level of institutionalization scales for health promotion programs

    Health Education Quarterly

    (1993)
  • R.M Goodman et al.

    Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement

    Health Education and Behavior

    (1998)
  • R.M Goodman et al.

    Mobilizing organizations for health enhancement

  • P.J Gray

    Viewing assessment as an innovation: Leadership and the change process

  • L.W Green

    Is institutionalization the proper goal of grantmaking?

    American Journal of Health Promotion

    (1989)
  • Cited by (317)

    • Sustaining population benefit using evidence-based public health

      2023, Principles and Application of Evidence-based Public Health Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text