Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 67, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 460-467
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Prostate Cancer
Editorial by Behfar Ehdaie and James A. Eastham on pp. 468–469 of this issue
Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Background

Value-based health care has been proposed as a unifying force to drive improved outcomes and cost containment.

Objective

To develop a standard set of multidimensional patient-centered health outcomes for tracking, comparing, and improving localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatment value.

Design, setting, and participants

We convened an international working group of patients, registry experts, urologists, and radiation oncologists to review existing data and practices.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The group defined a recommended standard set representing who should be tracked, what should be measured and at what time points, and what data are necessary to make meaningful comparisons. Using a modified Delphi method over a series of teleconferences, the group reached consensus for the Standard Set.

Results and limitations

We recommend that the Standard Set apply to men with newly diagnosed localized PCa treated with active surveillance, surgery, radiation, or other methods. The Standard Set includes acute toxicities occurring within 6 mo of treatment as well as patient-reported outcomes tracked regularly out to 10 yr. Patient-reported domains of urinary incontinence and irritation, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms, and hormonal symptoms are included, and the recommended measurement tool is the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. Disease control outcomes include overall, cause-specific, metastasis-free, and biochemical relapse-free survival. Baseline clinical, pathologic, and comorbidity information is included to improve the interpretability of comparisons.

Conclusions

We have defined a simple, easily implemented set of outcomes that we believe should be measured in all men with localized PCa as a crucial first step in improving the value of care.

Patient summary

Measuring, reporting, and comparing identical outcomes across treatments and treatment centers will provide patients and providers with information to make informed treatment decisions. We defined a set of outcomes that we recommend being tracked for every man being treated for localized prostate cancer.

Keywords

Outcome measurement
Patient-reported
Prostate cancer
Value

Cited by (0)

1

These authors are co-first authors.