Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 66, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages 569-576
European Urology

Bladder Cancer
Propensity-Matched Comparison of Morbidity and Costs of Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomies: A Contemporary Population-Based Analysis in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Radical cystectomy (RC) is a morbid procedure associated with high costs. Limited population-based data exist on the complication profile and costs of robot-assisted RC (RARC) compared with open RC (ORC).

Objective

To evaluate morbidity and cost differences between ORC and RARC.

Design, setting, and participants

We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RC at 279 hospitals across the United States between 2004 and 2010.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Multivariable logistic and median regression was performed to evaluate 90-d mortality, postoperative complications (Clavien classification), readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and direct costs. To reduce selection bias, we used propensity weighting with survey weighting to obtain nationally representative estimates.

Results and limitations

The final weighted cohort included 34 672 ORC and 2101 RARC patients. RARC use increased from 0.6% in 2004 to 12.8% in 2010. Major complication rates (Clavien grade ≥3; 17.0% vs 19.8%, p = 0.2) were similar between ORC and RARC (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32; p = 0.42). RARC had 46% decreased odds of minor complications (Clavien grade 1–2; OR: 0.54; p = 0.03). RARC had $4326 higher adjusted 90-d median direct costs (p = 0.004). Although RARC had a significantly shorter LOS (11.8 d vs 10.2 d; p = 0.008), no significant differences in room and board costs existed (p = 0.20). Supply costs for RARC were significantly higher ($6041 vs $3638; p < 0.0001). Morbidity and cost differences were not present among the highest-volume surgeons (≥7 cases per year) and hospitals (≥19 cases per year). Limitations include use of an administrative database and lack of oncologic characteristics.

Conclusions

The use of RARC has increased between 2004 and 2010. Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with decreased odds of minor but not major complications and with increased expenditures attributed primarily to higher supply costs. Centralization of ORC and RARC to high-volume providers may minimize these morbidity and cost differences.

Patient summary

Using a US population–based cohort, we found that robotic surgery for bladder cancer decreased minor complications, had no impact on major complications and was more costly than open surgery.

Introduction

Bladder cancer (BCa) imposes a significant burden on the health care system, with approximately $3 billion in annual expenditures in the United States [1]. Patients who have muscle-invasive BCa contribute substantially to this economic burden, because the gold-standard therapy—radical cystectomy (RC)—is a complex surgical procedure with a high surgical complication rate [2], [3]. These postoperative complications frequently increase hospital length of stay (LOS) and use of hospital resources, thereby raising medical expenditures.

Since the 1990s, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained popularity because of its potential to reduce surgical morbidity and shorten LOS. Laparoscopic RC was first described in 1993 [4] but was not widely adopted, likely because of the demand for advanced laparoscopic skills [5]. Since robot-assisted RC (RARC) was first reported in 2003 [6], there has been renewed optimism for reducing the morbidity of RC with MIS.

The investigations directly comparing the outcomes of RARC with open RC (ORC) are primarily single-institution studies [7], [8], [9] or without a standardized 90-d measure for complications [2], as recommended by the European Association of Urology (EAU) [10], [11]. Herein, we performed a contemporary population-based analysis to examine utilization rates, associated morbidity with the Clavien classification system, and costs of RARC compared with ORC.

Section snippets

Data source

Premier Perspective Database (Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA) is an all-payer hospital discharge database developed for quality and utilization benchmarking in the United States [12]. It includes more than 45 million inpatient discharges (about 20% of total discharges) from approximately 600 hospitals, capturing all hospital costs and charges. Each patient has a unique identifier, permitting longitudinal analysis. All data are de-identified, and we received institutional review board

Study cohort

The study cohort consisted of 6195 patients, equaling a survey-weighted cohort of 43 647 and a survey- and propensity-weighted cohort of 36 773, who underwent either ORC or RARC. After propensity weighting, all characteristics were comparable (p > 0.05; Table 1). Patients tended to be male (83.0%), white (76.5%), and married (59.7%). The mean and median age was 68.7 and 70.0 yr of age, respectively. Over the course of the study, 2101 (5.7%) RCs were performed with robotic assistance. The

Discussion

Our contemporary population-based study shows progressive RARC adoption between 2004 and 2010 in the United States, which was associated with similar morbidity compared with ORC while having significantly higher costs. The current study expands on the findings of a population-based study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) by Yu et al., which reported that RARC was associated with fewer overall inpatient complications than ORC (49.1% and 63.8%; p = 0.035) [2]. Unlike the prior study, we

Conclusions

Our contemporary, population-based evaluation shows a gradual adoption of RARC between 2004 and 2010 in the United States, with robot-assisted surgery currently involved in one out of every nine RC cases. The advent of RARC has not improved the morbidity profile of RC while simultaneously increasing expenditures, primarily because of the costly supplies associated with the robotic platform. Despite the apparent lack of benefit for robotic surgery, the current study demonstrates that RARC can

References (30)

  • D.C. Snow-Lisy et al.

    Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes

    Eur Urol

    (2014)
  • C.T. Lee et al.

    Bladder cancer: diagnosis, therapeutics, and management

    (2011)
  • E. Sanchez de Badajoz et al.

    Radical cystectomy and laparoscopic ileal conduit [in Spanish]

    Arch Esp Urol

    (1993)
  • M. Menon et al.

    Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion

    BJU Int

    (2003)
  • A.K. Kader et al.

    Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy: comparison of complications and perioperative oncological outcomes in 200 patients

    BJU Int

    (2013)
  • Cited by (205)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text