Comparison of Orthotopic Sigmoid and Ileal Neobladders: Continence and Urodynamic Parameters
Introduction
Many different methods of bladder substitution have been developed in the attempt to achieve the goal of a neobladder that functions as well as a normal bladder. The ideal neobladder substitute should have adequate capacity, store urine at low pressure, preserve continence, evacuate via the urethra with minimal residual urine, preserve the upper urinary tract and renal function, and cause no or minimal metabolic disturbance. Various segments of small and large bowel have been used for neobladder construction.
The use of sigmoid colon for the creation of a continent voiding pouch was initially popularized in the United States at the University of Minnesota. The Minnesota group developed a partially detubularized U-shaped segment that later evolved into a fully detubularized sigmoid neobladder. Satisfactory results with this technique were described by the Minnesota group and others [1], [2].
Kock was the first (1969) to construct a continent low pressure ileal reservoir. The first (1979) who anastomosed ileum to the urethra were Camey and Le Duc [3], [4]. These techniques were modified and incorporated by Hautmann (1986) and many others [5], [6], [7]. Good functional outcome of this technique was reported by the Hautmann group [8], [9].
Whether an ileum or sigmoid configuration is used depends on the availability of bowel segments, the physical and physiological characteristics of bowel when it is incorporated in the urinary tract, and the preference of the surgeon. We report the long-term continence rates and compare urodynamic results of an ileal [9] and a sigmoid orthotopic neobladder constructed with a short distal segment of sigmoid [10].
Section snippets
Patient selection
From 1988 to 2000, 112 male patients underwent radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder carcinoma and construction of an orthotopic continent urinary reservoir at our institutes. Criteria for a bladder substitution were: absence of bladder neck invasion or prostatic infiltration, patients’ compliance, normal renal function and a good previous continence status. Relative contraindications were the presence of a diffuse carcinoma in situ (Cis) and lymph node metastases. Fifty patients received a
Free uroflowmetry
All but one patient could void spontaneously and performed free uroflowmetry. The results of free uroflowmetry are shown in Table 1. The patient who could not void required clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) 4 times a day to empty his (ileal) neobladder. At the moment of the assessment a PVR higher than 100 ml (but less than 250 ml) was objectivated in 8 (24%) of the patients with a SN and in 2 (10%) of the patients with an IN. The PVR in all but one of these patients remained stable or
Patient selection
The two groups of patients are only comparable with regard to the indication to perform a cystectomy and create an intestinal neobladder, due to bladder cancer. For example, mean age, period of follow-up and anti-reflux technique are different. Therefore, the authors caution the reader for an imbalance between the studied groups.
The difference in percentage of patients studied (32% of IN patients and 68% of SN patients) has several explanations. Cultural differences concerning either patients
Conclusions
A neobladder constructed from detubularized ileum or sigmoid achieves adequate capacity with a satisfactory daytime continence rate (90% versus 85%). The nighttime continence rate of SN is low (9%) due to a limited functional bladder capacity. Nighttime incontinence in patients with IN (40%) can at least partly be explained by periods of high pressure due to neobladder contractions in combination with a relaxed sphincter during sleep. While ileal neobladder meets the functional day and night
References (24)
The colonic neobladder
Urol Clin North Am
(1991)- et al.
Neobladder construction using completely detubularized sigmoid colon after radical cystoprostatectomy
J Urol
(1991) - et al.
The ileal neobladder
J Urol
(1988) - et al.
Le Bag: total replacement of the bladder using an ileocolonic pouch
J Urol
(1986) - et al.
A novel uretero-ileal reimplantation technique: the serous lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report
J Urol
(1994) - et al.
The ileal neobladder: 6 years of experience with more than 200 patients
J Urol
(1993) - et al.
Neobladder constructing using completely detubularized sigmoid colon after radical cystoprostatectomy
J Urol
(1991) - et al.
Complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of follow-up
J Urol
(1999) - et al.
An original antireflux ureteroileal implantation technique: long-term followup
J Urol
(1987) - et al.
Complications of bladder substitution and continent urinary diversion
Urology
(1989)
Kock pouch bladder replacement
Urol Clin North Am
Nocturnal enuresis in men with an orthotopic ileal reservoir: urodynamic evaluation
J Urol
Cited by (70)
Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy With Extracorporeal Neobladder: Our Initial Experience
2019, UrologyCitation Excerpt :The IUPUB was made from the ileum. Compared with the colon and cecum, the ileum has less contractibility and better compliance.15 Thus, a neobladder made of ileum exhibits lower pressure and better continence rates.
Urinary diversion in the genitourinary cancer survivor
2018, Gynecologic OncologyOpen Techniques and Extent (Including Pelvic Lymphadenectomy)
2018, Bladder CancerPerioperative morbidity, bowel function and oncologic outcome after radical cystectomy and ileal orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: Studer-pouch versus I-pouch
2018, European Journal of Surgical OncologyFunctional evaluation of a modified Studer ileal neobladder
2016, African Journal of Urology