The Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit
Introduction
Several clinical audits have been initiated internationally, acknowledging the importance of reliable and valid quality information in health care. Clinical auditing has been recognised as an important tool for quality assessment and improvement, consequently leading to demonstrable improvements in patient outcome.1, 2, 3, 4 Moreover, clinical audits are increasingly appreciated as a source of information for research on evidence based medicine as they provide ‘real world’ data on patients often not eligible for clinical trials.5 However, the voluntary nature of existing audits may unintentionally lead to participation of mainly dedicated hospitals and underrepresentation of underperforming hospitals. Also, audit data are seldom transparent to other stakeholders involved in health care.
In 2009, the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) was initiated by the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands (ASN) in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Surgical Oncology (NVCO), the Dutch Association for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NVGIC) and the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). Their main goal was to evaluate and improve quality of care for primary colorectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands.
After one year of registration, participation in the audit had become a national performance indicator. Full participation of Dutch hospitals was realised within two years. Subsequent to this success, the Dutch Institute of Clinical Auditing (DICA) was founded in 2011 with the objective to facilitate and organise the start-up of new nation-wide audits. This article illustrates the introduction of the DSCA in the Netherlands by describing its main features and presenting the results of three years of auditing.
Section snippets
Main features of the DSCA
This section describes the organisational and structural key elements of the DSCA.
Dataset
From 2009 to 2011, 26,511 patients undergoing surgical resection for colorectal carcinoma were registered by all 92 hospitals providing colorectal cancer care in the Netherlands (8 university, 47 teaching and 37 non-teaching hospitals). The national case ascertainment and completeness of the data per patient record was high. Compared with the data collected by the NCR, the DSCA included 80% of all eligible patients in 2009, 92% in 2010, and 95% in 2011. External data verification with the NCR
Discussion
This paper reports the key elements of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit that have been crucial for its success. Quality of care regarding guideline compliance and clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands improved significantly.
Numerous international audit projects leading to substantial improvements in quality of care have preceded the DSCA. Many examples of successful clinical audits have been described in detail.2, 3, 18, 19, 20 Often, the main goal of the audit
Funding
No funding was acquired.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References (21)
- et al.
Variation in treatment and outcome of patients with rectal cancer by region, hospital type and volume in the Netherlands
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in the Netherlands
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2011) - et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chronic Dis
(1987) - et al.
Validation of a combined comorbidity index
J Clin Epidemiol
(1994) - et al.
The national bowel cancer audit project: the impact of organisational structure on outcome in operative bowel cancer within the United Kingdom
Surg Oncol
(2011) - et al.
The EURECCA project: data items scored by European colorectal cancer audit registries
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2012) - et al.
Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005–2008
J Surg Res
(2011) - et al.
‘Clinical auditing’, a novel tool for quality assessment in surgical oncology]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
(2011) - et al.
Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study
Ann Surg
(2008)
Cited by (275)
Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
2024, Journal of Surgical ResearchManagement of non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 colon cancer
2024, Best Practice and Research: Clinical GastroenterologyIdentifying a common data dictionary across colorectal cancer outcome registries: A mapping exercise to identify opportunities for data dictionary harmonisation
2024, European Journal of Surgical OncologyVariation in hospital performances after colorectal cancer surgery: A case-mix adjusted Dutch population based study
2024, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- d
Both authors equally contributed to this manuscript.