European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Full length articleDoes the effect of one-day simulation team training in obstetric emergencies decline within one year? A post-hoc analysis of a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial
Introduction
Ensuring the safety of patients is an important aspect in emergency health care, including obstetrics [1]. Patient safety in obstetric care has an extra dimension because the health of both mother and child are at risk [2]. Unexpected life-threatening events can happen at every moment, challenging obstetric care teams to make decisions under major time pressure. Consequently, medical errors occur which can have extensive effects for patients [3], and [4]. A considerable proportion of these medical errors are related to a lack of non-technical skills, such as communication and teamwork [5]. Training of these non-technical skills is therefore thought to be important to improve patient safety. In fact, a recent review showed that the use of simulation training is effective for educating communication and critical thinking skills [6]. Our research group showed that technology-enhanced simulation team training in obstetrics, with a special focus on non-technical skills, was associated with a better team performance on the Clinical Teamwork Scale [7] and significant better use of technical skills [8]. Similar results were found in other studies [9], and [10] but randomised controlled trials are scarce and only moderate benefits were identified on patient outcome [11], and [12]. In view of the identified knowledge gap, we conducted a cluster randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of a one-day simulation-based obstetric teamwork training in a simulation centre on the number of obstetric complications, during a one year follow-up (TOSTI study) [13], and [14]. The primary outcome, which was a composite of neonatal and maternal obstetric complications was comparable in the intervention and control group. A breakdown of the primary outcome indicated less trauma due to shoulder dystocia in the intervention group and increased invasive treatment for severe postpartum haemorrhage.
One of the possible limitations of this one-day intervention was that a decay of trainees' acquired skills may have occurred during the one year follow-up after training, resulting in a decline of the effect of simulation-based team training on patient outcome. To assess this decay we performed a post-hoc analysis of the TOSTI trial and divided the one year follow-up in four equal periods of three months assuming that most effects on patient outcomes will be seen in the first period after team training in comparison with the later periods.
Section snippets
Trial design, study population and intervention
We performed a post-hoc analysis of a cluster randomised clinical trial that evaluated the effect of simulation-based team training on patient outcome, the TOSTI trial. Full details of the TOSTI trial, including the CONSORT flowchart, were reported previously [8], [13], and [14]. In short, the study was a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial performed between November 2009 and July 2011 to evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation-based obstetric teamwork training in a medical
Results
There were 24 units randomised and included in the analysis (see CONSORT flow chart in Fig. 1). Each study group contained five teaching and seven non-teaching units. The starting time of the follow-up period of one year was synchronised with the moment that the entire unit was trained. In total, 74 multi-professional teams received the training, consisting of 74 gynaecologists, 36 residents, 79 midwives and 282 nurses. Participation rates of the healthcare profesionals of the included
Comment
Our multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial revealed that a one-day, multi-professional, simulation-based obstetric team training in a simulation centre, focusing on teamwork skills, did not reduce a composite of obstetric complications. This was also the case in this post-hoc analysis. A breakdown of the components of the primary outcome showed a reduction in the number of trauma due to shoulder dystocia in the intervention group. Our current study shows that this effect was mainly a
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
This study is funded by ZonMW, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, grant (170992303). This organisation was not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Ethical approval
As this was a cluster randomised clinical trial allocating interventions at a group level, the institutional review board of the Máxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, the Netherlands judged that ethical approval was not necessary. The trial has been registered in the Dutch trial register number NTR 1859.
Acknowledgements
Participating hospitals
We thank all 24 hospitals for participating in our study. Per Dutch cluster:
Cluster Amsterdam: Kennemer Gasthuis Haarlem, Rode Kruis Hospital Beverwijk, Waterland Hospital Purmerend. Cluster Brabant: Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Sint Anna Hospital Geldrop, Sint Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, Sint Jans Gasthuis Weert, Tweesteden Hospital Tilburg. Cluster Groningen: Scheper Hospital Emmen. Cluster Leiden: Diaconessenhuis Leiden, Groene Hart Hospital Gouda, Langeland Hospital
References (28)
- et al.
Stratified randomization for clinical trials
J Clin Epidemiol
(1999) - et al.
Retention of factual knowledge after practical training for intrapartum emergencies
Int J Gynecol Obstet
(2013) - et al.
Myths and realities in obstetric emergencies
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
(2015) - et al.
What is the impact of multi-professional emergency obstetric and neonatal care training?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
(2015) Patient safety curriculum guide: Mult-profesional edition
(2011)- et al.
Prospective randomized trial of simulation versus didactic teaching for obstetrical emergencies
Simul Healthc
(2010) Confidential enquiry into maternal and child health
CEMACH 6th report: why mothers die 2000–2002
(2004)Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The eight report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the united kingdom
BJOG
(2011)- et al.
To err is human; building a safer health system
(2000) - et al.
Effective in-service training design and delivery: evidence from an integrative literature review
Hum Resour Health
(2013)
Validation of a tool to measure and promote clinical teamwork
Simul Healthc
Effect of obstetric team training on team performance and medical technical skills: a randomised controlled trial
BJOG
Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins
Obstet Gynecol
Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training
BJOG
Cited by (22)
Guidelines for the management of urgent obstetric situations in emergency medicine, 2022
2022, Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain MedicineCitation Excerpt :To our knowledge, only 13 studies, of which 7 were found in the review of the literature, contributed to analysis of the repercussions of simulation on maternal and foetal morbi-mortality. It bears mentioning that these studies are heterogeneous, and that 6 of them concerned developing countries, where the rate of morbi-mortality often largely exceeds the world average, rendering problematic the interpretation of expected improvement in these countries; what is more, only 3 of these studies were randomised and controlled [84–86]. That said, one study detected an impact on neonatal injuries after shoulder dystocia (OR 0.50 [0.25–0.99]) [86], and some non-randomised studies found an impact on maternal mortality (RR 0.71 [0.65–0 .77] [87] and RR 0.25 [0.08–0.80] [88]), Apgar < 7 at 5 min (RR 0.51 [0.35–0.74] [89] and RR 0.70 [0.53–0.92] [90]), post-partum haemorrhage > 500 mL (RR 0.55 [0.44–0.69] [90] and RR 0.65 [0.43–0.98] [91]), and less injury at birth of the brachial plexus following shoulder dystocia (RR 0.31 [0.13–0.72] [92] and RR 0.27 [0.12–0.66] [93]).
Implementing E-Learning to Enhance the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage
2020, Nursing for Women's HealthABO O gene frequency increase in the US might be causing increased maternal mortality
2020, Medical HypothesesCitation Excerpt :The rate of maternal mortality is directly related to the frequency of ABO O in world wide populations. [18–19] ABO O is a gene that causes blood clotting deficits and obstetric hemorrhage. [9–16,16–17,28,66–77] Gene frequency of ABO O in the US has increased over the past 30 years directly correlating with the increase in maternal mortality. [35,46,47]
Simulation-based training of vaginal twin delivery for experienced gynaecologists: Useful or not?
2020, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyCitation Excerpt :A previous study showed a reduction in the number of trauma due to shoulder dystocia after SBT [21]. However, approximately hundred days after the training, this beneficial effect declined [22]. For practising obstetrician-gynaecologists working in a setting with a high baseline rate of VD for twin deliveries, SBT results in beneficial effects on knowledge and comfort concerning twin VD.
Competence retention in safety-critical professions: A systematic literature review
2020, Educational Research ReviewCitation Excerpt :In addition, Molinas and Campo (2016) and Wolfe et al. (2015) found that more initial training was related to better retention. The reviewed studies on refresher training confirmed that a refresher training is important for competence retention, or for improving competence after a period of non-use (Boet et al., 2011; Kelm et al., 2015; Nishiyama et al., 2015; Toledo et al., 2012; Van de Ven, Fransen et al., 2017; Van de Ven, Van Baaren et al., 2017; Wolfe et al., 2015). More refresher training resulted in better competence retention (Hsieh et al., 2018; Van de Ven, Van Baaren et al., 2017).