Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 81, August 2017, Pages 228-236
European Journal of Cancer

Original Research
Phase II trial of the PI3 kinase inhibitor buparlisib (BKM-120) with or without enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.030Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Buparlisib ± enzalutamide had limited efficacy in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progression.

  • Buparlisib ± enzalutamide was overall well tolerated.

  • We observed significant reductions in buparlisib drug concentrations with combination therapy.

  • Future enzalutamide combination studies should account for CYP enzyme induction by enzalutamide.

  • Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)-guided and biomarker-selected studies of upfront phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/androgen receptor inhibition in men with mCRPC are needed.

Abstract

Background

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and androgen receptor pathway activation is common in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Buparlisib is an oral, pan-class I PI3 kinase inhibitor.

Methods

This was a multisite single arm phase II trial of buparlisib 100 mg ± enzalutamide daily in men with mCRPC whose disease progressed on or who were not candidates for docetaxel. The primary end-point was the rate of radiographic/clinical progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months.

Results

Thirty men were accrued: 67% post-docetaxel; median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 70 ng/dl, 83% had ≥4 prior therapies for mCRPC; 43% received concurrent enzalutamide. The final 6 month PFS rate was estimated to be 10% (95% confidence interval 2.5–23.6%). Median PFS was 1.9 months and was 3.5 months with concurrent enzalutamide. Median overall survival was 10.6 months. Concurrent enzalutamide led to a five-fold reduction in buparlisib concentrations. PSA declines were observed in 23%; no patients achieved a ≥50% decline, and no radiographic responses were observed. Severe adverse events occurred in four men including respiratory infection and multi-organ failure, urinary tract obstruction, confusion and one seizure in the setting of a new central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Grade III adverse events were seen in 43% of patients; common toxicities included grade I–II weight loss, diarrhoea, nausea, fatigue, anorexia, rash, hyperglycemia and anxiety/mood disorders.

Conclusions

Buparlisib did not demonstrate significant activity in men with mCRPC, suggesting that PI3K inhibition is not sufficient to reverse resistant mCRPC progression. Future studies of PI3K pathway inhibitors with concurrent enzalutamide should develop optimal dosing and focus on selected patients more likely to benefit.

Introduction

Despite immunotherapy, chemotherapy and novel androgen receptor (AR) directed therapies, men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop resistant disease progression within months to a few years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop more effective treatments.

A key oncogenic pathway implicated in CRPC progression is the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, which is activated in the majority of metastatic human prostate cancer (PC) samples, often through PTEN loss [7], [8]. The PI3K pathway has been shown to promote castration and chemotherapy resistance, stemness, cell growth and differentiation, as well as AR signalling, key hallmarks of CRPC lethality and progression [9], [10], [11], [12]. Clinical trials of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR; TORC1) inhibitors in men with PC have not demonstrated sufficient clinical activity, suggesting alternative pathways such as PI3 kinase and AR signalling may contribute to resistance [13], [14], [15], [16], [17].

Buparlisib (BKM-120) is an orally bioavailable pan-class I PI3K inhibitor [18]. In preclinical models, growth inhibition was observed in tumours with PIK3CA mutations preferentially, and in PTEN null models [18]. The recommended phase II dose of buparlisib is 100 mg once daily, with significant toxicities including mood disturbances (neuropsychiatric), hyperglycemia, and rash and target inhibition was demonstrated [19]. Pharmacodynamic inhibition of phospho-S6, a downstream biomarker of PI3K/mTOR pathway activity, was observed in 80% of patients at this dose level, along with concurrent increases in insulin and blood glucose, consistent with pathway inhibition. Partial response or stable disease was observed in over 50% of patients, including colorectal and breast carcinoma [19].

Reciprocal feedback inhibition of AR by PI3K signalling in PC has been noted, in which inhibition of PI3K leads to re-repression and activation of AR target genes, and inhibition of AR leads to reciprocal PI3K pathway activation in PC models [20], [21]. On the other hand, concomitant suppression of both PI3K and AR pathways led to tumour regressions [20]. Given that PI3K pathway activation is common in men with mCRPC, we conducted a phase II efficacy trial of buparlisib, with and without the potent AR inhibitor enzalutamide [1], in men with progressive mCRPC that progressed after multiple lines of standard therapy. The amendment permitting concurrent AR inhibition with enzalutamide was based on emerging data suggesting that combined PI3K and AR pathway inhibition could overcome reciprocal feedback AR pathway activation by PI3K single agent inhibition [20], [21].

Section snippets

Eligibility

Men with mCRPC were eligible if they were 18 years of age or older, had a Karnofsky performance status ≥70 and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were required to have histologically confirmed PC, metastatic disease and progressive disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) [22] or Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) prostate specific antigen (PSA) or radiographic progression (computed tomography [CT]/bone scan) criteria [23]. We amended

Results

From 25th August 2011 through 1st May 2014, 30 patients were enrolled into the phase II trial (see consort diagram, Supplementary Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Eighty-seven percent of subjects were white, 7% black. The majority of men had prior Gleason 8–10 disease (57%), multiple prior systemic therapies (56% had 6 or more), and 67% had prior docetaxel for mCRPC. Thirteen (43%) had prior enzalutamide and continued on enzalutamide with concurrent buparlisib (following

Discussion

In this trial, the pan-PI3 kinase inhibitor buparlisib (BKM-120) did not provide sufficient efficacy in men with treatment-refractory mCRPC as a single agent. In addition, we did not observe reversal of resistance or sufficient clinical activity among men with enzalutamide resistant mCRPC treated with continued enzalutamide and the addition of buparlisib. This was accompanied by reduced toxicity related to buparlisib and substantially lower concentrations of buparlisib, suggesting

Precis

This was a multisite phase II trial of buparlisib, a pan-class I PI3 kinase inhibitor, in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had failed or were not candidates for docetaxel. Buparlisib alone or in combination with enzalutamide did not improve progression-free survival, suggesting that phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and c-terminal androgen receptor inhibition is not sufficient to reverse resistant mCRPC progression.

Funding

This is an investigator-initiated/sponsored trial with funding from Novartis.

Author contributions

Conceptualisation and methodology was done by AA, SH and DG; SH and PH performed software and formal analysis; investigation was done by AA, JA, CW, RB, CS, TB, RS, KM, EY and DG; resources were collected by AA, JA, CW, JK, RB, CH, CS, TB, RS, KM, EY and DG; SH, PH and CW performed data curation; writing (original draft) and visualisation was fulfilled by AA, SH, PH, JA, JK, EY, DG; all the authors participated in writing (review and editing); AA, JA, EY and DG were involved in supervision and

Conflict of interest statement

AA receives research support from Medivation, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis and Dendreon, is a consultant/advisory board member for Medivation, Bayer and Sanofi-Aventis and a speaker for Dendreon and Sanofi-Aventis. JA receives research support from Novartis and Astellas. TB receives research support from Astellas and Medivation and is a consultant/advisory board member for Astellas. EY receives research support from Astellas, Bayer and Dendreon and is a consultant/advisory board member for

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the trial coordinators and their staff for their support in the conduct of this trial, and the patients and their families for their dedication to this research. The authors also wish to thank staff psychiatrists Sarah Rivelli MD (Duke) and Anne F. Gross MD (OHSU) for their support and assessments on this study. The authors acknowledge support of the Department of Defence Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium for the development of the database used for this

References (30)

  • T.M. Beer et al.

    Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2014)
  • P.W. Kantoff et al.

    Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • C.J. Ryan et al.

    Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • C. Parker et al.
    (2012)
  • I.F. Tannock et al.

    Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Molecular mechanisms and genetic alterations in prostate cancer: From diagnosis to targeted therapy

      2022, Cancer Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, rapamycin, a TORC1 inhibitor, and its derivatives, temsirolimus and everolimus, lacked significant efficacy, while dual blockade of TORC1 and TORC2 with drugs like dactolisib (BEZ2350) and MLN0128 have been followed by severe toxic effects [52]. Parallelly, buparlisib (BKM-120), the most extensively investigated PI3K inhibitor in PCa, failed in reverting castration resistance when given in combination with antiandrogens [122,123]. On the other hand, a combination of abiraterone and ipatasertib, an oral small molecule able to bind to the ATP-binding pocket of all three Akt isoforms, has been demonstrated to prolong radiographic progression-free survival over abiraterone alone, with even greater effects in patients with PTEN-null PCas with respect to those with the intact protein [124].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text