Elsevier

Eating Behaviors

Volume 18, August 2015, Pages 120-124
Eating Behaviors

Gender differences in the relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating behaviors and attitudes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Gender differences in impulsivity and disordered eating relations were studied in a large, non-clinical, college sample

  • Women reported more disordered eating symptoms than men on average

  • Men did endorse some disordered eating symptoms on average

  • Attentional and motor impulsivity were associated with disordered eating symptoms in both men and women

  • No gender differences were observed in the relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating symptoms

Abstract

Objective

We investigated relationships among gender, impulsivity and disordered eating in healthy college students.

Method

Participants (N = 1223) were healthy, undergraduate men (28.5%) and women (71.5%), who completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale — Version 11 (BIS-11) and a four-factor version of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-16).

Results

As predicted, mean scores on all four EAT-16 factors were significantly higher for women than for men. Attentional impulsivity was related to poorer self-perception of body shape, more dieting, and a greater preoccupation with food for the sample as a whole. Moreover, motor impulsivity was related to poorer self-perceptions of body shape and a greater preoccupation with food. However, no gender differences emerged in the relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating attitudes.

Discussion

This study elucidates the role of impulsivity in disordered eating behaviors among non-clinical college students. For both women and men, attentional and motor impulsivity were related to disordered eating attitudes and behaviors. Overall, these findings suggest that different facets of impulsivity are related to disordered eating attitudes and behaviors in a non-clinical college population.

Introduction

Disordered eating behaviors are highly prevalent among college-aged individuals, placing them at-risk for eating disorders (Krahn, Kurth, Gomberg, & Drewnowski, 2005). It is therefore important to understand which factors contribute to the likelihood of developing disordered eating behaviors. One such risk factor may be impulsivity, a multi-faceted trait marked by motor, non-planning, and attentional impulsiveness (Depue & Collins, 1999). Much research with clinical populations implicates impulsivity in eating disordered behaviors (e.g., Beck et al., 2009, Casper et al., 1992, Engel et al., 2005), though there are exceptions (e.g., Wonderlich, Connolly, & Stice, 2004). Most research with clinical populations suggests that individuals classified with binge eating disorder (BED) traits are more likely to be impulsive than those classified as exhibiting anorexia nervosa (AN) traits (Beck et al., 2009, Casper et al., 1992, Claes et al., 2002). However, others have found elevated levels of impulsivity among all eating disordered subtypes, suggesting that impulsivity is a common underlying factor associated with disordered eating, in general (Claes, Robinson, Muehlenkamp, Vandereycken, & Bijttebier, 2010).

Though research with clinical populations is important, there is a need for greater focus on sub- and non-clinical populations in order to identify characteristics that place individuals at-risk and to prevent clinical eating disorders from developing. If impulsivity can be regarded as a risk factor for clinical eating disorders, a relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating behaviors should be found and replicated in non-clinical populations. Moreover, sub-threshold eating problems often persist beyond college and into later adulthood, providing further support for examining potential risk factors in college populations (Arriaza & Mann, 2001). To date, the role of impulsivity in disordered eating behaviors in sub- or non-clinical populations is not well-established. Lyke and Spinella (2004) found significant correlations between motor and attentional impulsivity and disinhibited eating, as well as between attentional impulsivity and feelings of hunger. Others have also found general impulsive traits to relate to disordered eating behaviors and thoughts in non-clinical populations (Cooper et al., 2014, Fischer et al., 2003, Guerrieri et al., 2007, Leitch et al., 2013), though again, there are exceptions (e.g., Cooley, Toray, Valdez, & Tee, 2007).

Importantly, only one study examining impulsivity and eating behaviors in non-clinical populations included men (Lyke & Spinella, 2004), and this study did not examine gender differences. Though disordered eating behaviors and attitudes are more prevalent among women than men throughout childhood, adolescence and adulthood (Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Larson, Eisenberg, & Loth, 2011), this does not imply that men are immune to developing disordered eating behaviors (Hoerr, Bokram, Lugo, Bivins, & Keast, 2002). However, the manner in which men and women manifest disordered eating behaviors differs. For example, women are more likely to report dieting or purging than men, but may be equally (or even less) likely than men to report exercising excessively or binging (Anderson and Bulik, 2004, Grucza et al., 2007, Guidi et al., 2009, Striegel‐Moore et al., 2009). Another study found that women experienced disordered eating at greater rates, but that men's disordered eating was more persistent over time (Keel, Baxter, Heatherton, & Joiner, 2007). Thus, while research is beginning to elucidate gender differences in disordered eating behaviors, a thorough examination of gender disparities in disordered eating behaviors and attitudes among a general undergraduate population is currently lacking.

Moreover, there are important gender differences in impulsivity that could further complicate the relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating behaviors. In general, men exhibit more impulsivity than women (Cross, Copping, & Campbell, 2011). For instance, men tend to have a greater difficulty focusing their attention and considering the future (non-planning), and are more apt to sensation-seeking and risk-taking than women (Cross et al., 2011). Given these differences, it is plausible that gender differences may exist in the relationship between impulsivity and eating disordered attitudes and behaviors.

The purpose of the current study was to examine gender differences in: (1) disordered eating behaviors and attitudes; and (2) the relationship between impulsivity (i.e., non-planning, attentional, and motor impulsivity) and disordered eating behaviors and attitudes. Regarding the first aim, we hypothesized that men would report disordered eating behaviors and attitudes, though to a lesser degree than women. Regarding the second aim, we hypothesized that greater impulsivity (i.e., non-planning, attentional, and motor) would be associated with poorer self-perception of body shape and greater dieting, food preoccupation, and awareness of food contents among both men and women. We had no priori hypotheses regarding gender differences in these relationships, but rather, sought to describe any gender differences that emerged.

Section snippets

Participants and procedures

Undergraduate students (N = 1223) from a Midwestern university were recruited using the Psychology Department's online subject pool system where students were provided a brief description of the study and an opportunity to sign up for participation. Participants completed several questionnaires using MediaLab v2006.1.25 by Empirisoft Corporation (New York, NY) on a Dell Optiplex GX520 desktop computer via a Windows XP platform and received course credit. All participants gave written informed

Preliminary analyses

Pearson's correlations (Table 2) were used to examine relationships among the four factors from the EAT-16 (self-perception of body shape, dieting, awareness of food content, food preoccupation) and BIS-11 subscales (motor, attentional, non-planning). BIS-11 subscales were related to each other in the expected directions, as well as EAT-16 factors. Both BIS-11 motor and attentional impulsivity were positively associated with EAT-16 self-perception of body shape, dieting, and food preoccupation.

Discussion

The present study aimed to elucidate gender differences in eating disordered behaviors in a non-clinical, college sample, as well as in the multifaceted relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating behaviors. Consistent with the authors' first hypothesis, compared to men, women undergraduates reported greater disordered eating behaviors and attitudes on all four disordered eating factors (e.g., self-perception of body shape, dieting, awareness of food content, and preoccupation with

Role of funding sources

Funding for this study was provided by the University of Nebraska Research Council, the UNL Office of Research and Economic Development, the Psychology Department and the College of Arts & Sciences, which had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

Authors Stoltenberg and Christ designed the study and wrote the protocol. Authors Lundahl and Wahlstrom conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies. Authors Lundahl and Wahlstrom conducted the statistical analysis. Author Lundahl wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by Faculty Seed Grant from the University of Nebraska Research Council and by lab start-up funds provided by the UNL Office of Research and Economic Development, the Psychology Department and the College of Arts & Sciences. The funding sources had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

References (34)

  • M.A. Leitch et al.

    Different subtypes of impulsivity differentiate uncontrolled eating and dietary restraint

    Appetite

    (2013)
  • D. Neumark-Sztainer et al.

    Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: Findings from a 10-year longitudinal study

    Journal of the American Dietetic Association

    (2011)
  • M.S. Stanford et al.

    Impulsiveness and risk-taking behavior: Comparison of high-school and college students using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1996)
  • S.F. Stoltenberg et al.

    Does gender moderate associations among impulsivity and health-risk behaviors?

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2008)
  • C.A. Arriaza et al.

    Ethnic differences in eating disorder symptoms among college students: The confounding role of body mass index

    Journal of American College Health

    (2001)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • E. Cooley et al.

    Disordered eating in college freshman women: A prospective study

    Journal of American College Health

    (2001)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Orthorexia symptoms and disordered eating behaviors in young women with cancer

      2022, Eating Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although improving eating habits following a cancer diagnosis can be helpful, sometimes it is taken too far and becomes disordered eating. YAs have a higher prevalence of disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) than older adults (Aparicio-Martinez et al., 2019) and women are more likely to report DEB's than men (Kostopoulou & Katsouyanni, 2006; Lundahl et al., 2015). These behaviors encompass a wide range of irregular eating habits which can be defined as unhealthy or maladaptive (e.g., skipping meals, avoiding certain foods; Reba-Harrelson et al., 2009; Telch et al., 1998).

    • A growth mindset intervention to promote resilience against online peer victimization: A randomized controlled trial

      2022, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some previous studies have found that mindset interventions were more effective among younger adolescents (Calvete, Fernandez-Gonzalez et al., 2019; Calvete, Orue, et al., 2019). Moreover, there are important sex differences in several behavioral and emotional problems, with girls displaying higher scores in depressive symptoms (Webb, Sibinga, Musci, Clary, & Mendelson, 2021), eating problems (Lundahl, Wahlstrom, Christ, & Stoltenberg, 2015), and social anxiety (González-Diez et al., 2016) than boys. Grounded on these previous studies, we expected that the intervention would be more effective among girls and younger participants.

    • Associations among weight-based teasing distress, impulsive emotion regulation, and loss of control eating in racially and ethnically diverse young men

      2021, Eating Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      The tendency to engage in impulsive behaviors when distressed may exacerbate the link between weight-based teasing and LOC eating, but these associations have not been evaluated in men. Given that weight-based teasing appears to increase as boys reach adulthood (Haines et al., 2013) and is linked to poor psychological wellbeing and negative self-perceptions (Eisenberg et al., 2003), the tendency to engage in impulsive behaviors when distressed may be an important mechanism underpinning LOC eating among young men during this phase of life (Cyders & Smith, 2008; Fischer et al., 2013; Kelly et al., 2014; Lundahl et al., 2015; Racine et al., 2017; Smith, Mason, Crosby, Engel, & Wonderlich, 2019). As such, the primary objective of this study was to examine the association between weight-based teasing distress and LOC eating in a sample of young adult men.

    • Sex differences in eating related behaviors and psychopathology among adolescent military dependents at risk for adult obesity and eating disorders

      2019, Eating Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is possible that unique military stressors, including exposure to their parents' attitudes and behaviors in response to weight and shape requirements and other factors associated with their parents' careers, may impact boys and girls equivalently. Given that males typically report lower disordered-eating than females (Bartholdy et al., 2017; Lundahl et al., 2015),our findings may suggest that the males in our sample may be at higher risk for elevated disordered-eating attitudes in comparison to civilian boys. It should be underscored that while Eating Disorder Examination global scores were comparable to male and female youth with overweight or obesity who have experienced loss-of-control eating (Goldschmidt, Wilfley, Eddy, et al., 2011), they were below those of adults with eating disorders (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015).

    • Sex and gender differences in compulsive overeating

      2019, Compulsive Eating Behavior and Food Addiction: Emerging Pathological Constructs
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text