Elsevier

Eating Behaviors

Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 151-158
Eating Behaviors

Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among a United States adult sample

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.11.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among United States women ranges between 13.4% and 31.8%.

  • Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among United States men ranges between 9.0% and 28.4%.

  • Overweight and obese adults are at greater risk of body dissatisfaction.

  • The prevalence of body dissatisfaction has plateaued or declined over time.

Abstract

Body dissatisfaction (BD) is a primary determinant of eating disorders and has been linked to chronic disease via decreased likelihood of cancer screening self-exams and smoking cessation. Yet, there are few recent estimates of the prevalence of BD among United States adults. Using an internet-based, opt-in, cross-sectional survey, United States adults (N = 1893) completed assessments of demographic variables, body areas satisfaction, appearance evaluation, fitness evaluation, health evaluation, and overweight preoccupation. Results revealed that the range of BD is 13.4%–31.8% among women and 9.0%–28.4% among men. Compared to previous assessments of prevalence (1973, 1986, 1995, 1997), the prevalence of BD among United States adults may have plateaued or declined over time.

Introduction

Body image is defined as a persons body-related self-perceptions and self-attitudes, including thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (Cash, 2003). In some cases, extreme levels of body dissatisfaction (BD) can result in eating disorders (e.g., anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa), which have a lifetime prevalence of 2.5% and 0.8% for United States women and men, respectively (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope, & Kessler, 2007). For those who seek treatment, annual treatment costs range from $US 1288 to $US 8042 per person, per year (Stuhldreher et al., 2012). BD is also known to negatively influence behavioral risk factors for chronic disease, which affect an even greater proportion of the US population. For example, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, with a lifetime prevalence of 12.3% (Howlader et al., 2013). A recent literature review demonstrates that BD is associated with lower likelihood of engaging in breast cancer self-exams (Ridolfi & Crowther, 2013), which could provide early detection of the disease. BD is also associated with lower likelihood of smoking cessation (King et al., 2005), where smoking costs $US 96.8 billion annually in lost productivity and is responsible for almost 30% of cancer deaths (Centers for Disease Control, Prevention, 2008).

With such robust potential to influence health care costs as well as an individual's health and quality of life across the lifespan, it is imperative for behavioral scientists, clinicians, and public health professionals to be informed of the current overall prevalence of BD among the United States population, changes in BD prevalence over time, as well as understand which sub-populations are at risk. Salient to this study are four preceding national surveys assessing body image/BD among United States adults (Berscheid et al., 1973, Cash and Henry, 1995, Cash et al., 1986, Garner, 1997). Since 1972, a series of surveys have documented an increase in dissatisfaction in overall appearance among both men (15% to 43%) and women (23% to 56%). This often-cited research has led many to conclude that there is a ‘normative discontent’ or an ‘epidemic’ of BD in the United States, especially among women (Frederick et al., 2012, Rodin et al., 1984, Tantleff-Dunn et al., 2011). Since Garner (1997), however, very few studies have used national surveys of United States adults, and the few containing national samples, have either not used psychometrically valid measurement tools (Frederick, Peplau, & Lever, 2006), have used single-item measures of body satisfaction (Kruger, Lee, Ainsworth, & Macera, 2008), or have focused on specific United States subgroups (Peplau et al., 2009). Thus, a more recent assessment of overall prevalence of BD among United States adults is timely and the purpose of this study is threefold:

  • a.

    To provide an overall estimate of the national prevalence of BD among United States men and women,

  • b.

    To examine differences in BD across population subgroups (e.g., sex, race/ethnicity, age, body mass index category),

  • c.

    To compare the rates of BD of the present sample to previously published national samples.

Section snippets

Participants

Demographic information for adult volunteers (N = 1893; age range 18–90 years) who completed an online survey are presented in Table 1.

Procedure

Prior to data collection, Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for an internet-based, opt-in survey taking participants approximately 20–30 min to complete.1

Results

More women than men enrolled in the study, and the sample was predominantly white/Caucasian, middle aged, overweight and married/cohabitating. If frequency counts are used to define prevalence of body dissatisfaction, only 9% of men and 13.4% of women were dissatisfied with their overall appearance (see Table 4). If the mean score of the body areas satisfaction measure is used, the estimated prevalence of BD doubles, ranging between 12.2% and 21.2% for men, and 19.2–28.7% for women, depending

Discussion

The purpose of this research was to provide a recent overall estimate of the national prevalence of BD among United States men and women, examine differences in BD across population subgroups (e.g., sex, race/ethnicity, age, body mass index category), and compare the rates of BD of our sample to previously published national samples. Results show that the overall prevalence of BD is varied, depending on the specific measurement tool and cut-off protocol chosen (single-item vs. multiple-item

Role of Funding Sources

There were no funding sources.

Contributors

Fallon and Harris developed the manuscript concept and measurement protocols. Under the supervision of Fallon and Harris, Johnson submitted the IRB, translated the survey into an online data collection program, recruited participants and managed the data. Fallon analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors consulted throughout the process and contributed to the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References (31)

  • T.F. Cash

    The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire

    (2000)
  • T.F. Cash

    Body image: Past, present, and future

    Body Image

    (2003)
  • T.F. Cash et al.

    Women's body images: The results of a national survey in the USA

    Sex Roles

    (1995)
  • T.F. Cash et al.

    The great American shape-up: Body image survey report

    Psychology Today

    (1986)
  • Centers for Disease Control, Prevention

    Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses —United States, 2000–2004

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    The data for this study was collected at Kansas State University, but analyzed and the manuscript composed at Georgia State University. Elizabeth A. Fallon is now at Georgia State University and Brandonn S. Harris is now at Georgia Southern University. Paige Johnson is a recent graduate of Kansas State University, and does not currently maintain a university affiliation.

    We thank the survey respondents for their time and the students who helped collect the data; specifically, laboratory assistants Joseph Lightner, Abby Banks, Madelaine Ellison, Annie Pipes, Tracy Engstrom, and Laura Moluf.

    View full text