The impact of age and BMI on Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) scores in a community sample
Highlights
► In a national sample of women aged 16–50 we established norms for EDE-Q scores. ► We investigated the effects of age and BMI on EDE-Q scores. ► EDE-Q scores decreased significantly with age yet increased with BMI. ► BMI had a much higher impact on EDE-Q scores than age.
Introduction
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) has been developed as a reliable and valid self-report questionnaire version (Luce and Crowther, 1999, Peterson et al., 2007) of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) (Fairburn, Cooper, & O'Conner, 2008) and is widely used in both research and clinical settings worldwide. Normative data are increasingly available from various community settings in England, USA, Fiji, Australia, Sweden, and Norway, yet most studies have focused on younger samples of women aged 15 to 30 years (Becker et al., 2010, Carter et al., 2001, Luce et al., 2008, Ro et al., 2010, Welch et al., 2011). A study of 5255 women aged 18 to 42 years generally found less pathology among older women (Mond, Hay, Rodgers, & Owen, 2006). Other research, however, has documented high levels of disordered eating and body dissatisfaction among middle-aged women aged 35 to 55 years (Perez, Hernandez, Clarke, & Joiner, 2007), rendering the relationship between age and pathology less clear.
Elevated BMI is a widely demonstrated risk factor for body dissatisfaction and dieting among women of all ages (McLean et al., 2010, Slevec and Tiggemann, 2011) and some authors have proposed a higher cut-point on the EDE-Q to more accurately detect eating disorders among populations overrepresented with older and/or overweight individuals (Mond et al., 2008). Given the well-documented association between increasing age and higher BMI on a population level (Haslam & James, 2005), it is important to ascertain their relative influence to better interpret scores. Few studies have included samples large enough to accurately detect age and BMI-related trends. The aims of this study were to investigate the unique and relative effects of age and BMI on pathology as measured by the EDE-Q in a nationally representative sample of women to provide a normative context for interpreting scores and determining clinical significance.
Section snippets
Study design and participants
A representative community sample of 3000 Norwegian women aged 16–50 years was randomly selected from the Norwegian National Population Register. Questionnaires were mailed to the selected addresses via post, and the respondents were asked to either return the questionnaires via post or to complete the questionnaires online. After about 4 weeks, a reminder notice was sent to all 3000 women. Participation in the study was completely anonymous. However, the participants were invited to participate
Results
Completed questionnaires were received from 1094 individuals, of whom 1005 (91.9%) had responded by post and 89 (8.1%) had responded online. The overall response rate was 37.4% after accounting for incorrect addresses (n = 78), which were confirmed by envelopes marked ‘return to sender due to the wrong address’. Approximately 1% of the items required for scoring the EDE-Q subscales and global score were missing. Subscale scores were computed only if more than half of the relevant items were
Discussion
This study investigated the unique and relative effects of age and BMI in a large community sample of non-treatment seeking women. Our results demonstrated two significant linear trends, specifically EDE-Q scores decreased with age yet increased with BMI. Two notable exceptions were levels of purging behavior, which did not vary significantly across age or weight status, and dietary restraint, which did not differ by age. In contrast with prior research (Mond et al., 2006), we did not find that
Role of funding sources
Not applicable.
Contributors
Authors Rosenvinge and Ro designed the study and wrote the protocol. All authors contributed to data management and statistical analysis. Author Reas conducted the literature search. Dr. Reas and Ro wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest exist by any author.
References (20)
- et al.
Evaluation of a new instrument for the detection of eating disorders in community samples
Psychiatry Research
(1992) - et al.
Obesity
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): Norms for young adult women
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2006) - et al.
Screening for eating disorders in primary care: EDE-Q versus SCOFF
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2008) - et al.
Analysis of bulimic symptomology across age and geographic locations
Eating Behaviors
(2007) - et al.
Predictors of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in middle-aged women
Clinical Psychology Review
(2011) - et al.
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire: General population and clinical norms for young adult women in Sweden
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2011) - Allen, K. L., Fursland, A., Raykos, B., Steele, A., Watson, H., & Byrne, S. M. (in press). Motivation-focused Treatment...
- et al.
Validity and reliability of a Fijian translation and adaptation of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
International Journal of Eating Disorders
(2010) - et al.
Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods
International Journal of Eating Disorders
(2001)
Cited by (87)
Sources of body comparison and their relation to body image concerns among middle-aged women
2021, Eating BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :More details regarding specific comparisons are presented in Table 1. Mean body image concerns across all participants was 2.13 (observed range = 0.00–5.83, SD = 1.44), which is comparable to community norms for middle-aged women (Rø et al., 2012). Evaluations regarding which source of comparison was more strongly associated with body image concerns (see Table 2) suggest that self-oriented body comparison to their younger selves (β = 0.24, p < .001) and body comparison to same-sex peers (β = 0.45, p < .001) both explained a significant proportion of variance of body image concerns above and beyond the other sources.