Twenty years of research on parental mind-mindedness: Empirical findings, theoretical and methodological challenges, and new directions
Introduction
Almost 20 years ago now, Meins (1997) coined the term parental mind-mindedness to refer to caregivers’ proclivity to attribute mental states to their young children. With the ambitious goal of rethinking maternal sensitivity (Meins, Fernyhough, Fradley, & Tuckey, 2001), Meins (1999) drew on attachment and social-cognitive theories to propose that mind-mindedness was the cognitive substrate of parental responsiveness during parent-child interactions. For the first 10 years, much of the published research was conducted at the laboratory that developed the construct. As time passed, however, teams from different countries started to publish their findings with mind-mindedness, providing an increasingly rich data base. Mind-mindedness has been proposed as a theoretical construct that can advance our understanding of the processes that underpin the intergenerational transmission of attachment and one that is relatively straightforward to operationalize empirically (Meins, 1999, Meins, 2013). With almost two decades of published work, the time is ripe to evaluate whether mind-mindedness has fulfilled its ambitious promises. This paper first presents an overview of the theoretical background to mind-mindedness, followed by a review of empirical research that considers the merits and shortcomings of existing conceptualizations and identifies inconsistencies, controversies and questions that have not yet been adequately answered. We conclude with suggested directions for future research and theory development.
Mind-mindedness captures a caregiver’s attunement to his or her infant’s mental states, including emotions, preferences, motives and goals, and the tendency to interpret behavior as resulting from these mental states. Meins (2013) emphasized the origins of the construct in attachment theory, particularly Mary Ainsworth’s seminal work on maternal sensitivity and her explicit focus on the caregiver’s capacity to accurately perceive and interpret her infant’s signals and communications (Ainsworth, Bell, & Stayton, 1974). Meins et al. (2001) described mind-mindedness as a naturalistic measure of caregivers’ representations of their child’s mental states grounded in real-time interaction. Thus the construct is considered to be at the interface of representations and behavior (Meins, 2013).
In an influential meta-analysis, Van IJzendoorn (1995) explored evidence that parents’ representations of their own childhood attachment experiences (or “attachment state of mind”) as revealed in narrative interviews predicted the quality of the attachment relationships they formed with their children (Adult Attachment Interview; AAI; Main, Kaplan, & Cassidy, 1985), and whether maternal sensitivity was the pathway through which these associations were mediated. Contrary to expectations, maternal sensitivity accounted for only a modest portion of the common variance between maternal state of mind regarding attachment and child attachment security, a so-called “transmission gap” (p. 398), recently confirmed in a larger meta-analysis (Verhage et al., 2016). As a result, Van IJzendoorn (1995) called for a refinement in approaches to measurement of caregiver sensitivity. In response, Meins et al. (2001) developed a brief laboratory-based assessment of caregiver linguistic behaviors that focused on the accuracy of the caregiver’s reading of the child’s cues, based on Ainsworth’s proposition (Ainsworth et al., 1974) that the mother’s capacity to see things from the child’s point of view and understand the intention underlying infant signals was crucial to providing a timely and appropriate response, the core element of parental sensitivity. Meins further proposed that this capacity to accurately represent the child’s mental states had the potential to bridge the transmission gap (Meins, 1999).
The development of the construct was also influenced by Vygotsky’s (1978;1987) ideas about the dialogic nature of higher mental functions (Fernyhough, 2008) and the importance of social-environmental influences, particularly adult language and scaffolding during interaction, for children’s learning, particularly their social understanding. Meins (1997) proposed that caregivers who are oriented to the mental states of their infants have the capacity to recognize their infant’s cognitive potential and provide appropriate developmental challenges to maximize their learning opportunities, particularly with respect to social cognition and emotion understanding.
From these origins, early research on mind-mindedness sought to demonstrate links between mind-mindedness and attachment constructs (particularly maternal sensitivity, maternal state of mind with respect to attachment, and mother-child attachment security) as well as children’s emerging cognitive capacities and social understanding (particularly theory of mind).
Before examining how the construct is operationalized and reviewing empirical research, we briefly consider mind-mindedness in the context of related constructs that focus on adult mentalizing in the context of the parent-child relationship, notably reflective functioning (RF) and insightfulness. Mentalizing, broadly defined as the ability to interpret and predict the behavior of self and others in relation to mental processes, was originally coded from adult accounts (retrospective) of the behavior of their own caregivers during the AAI, referred to as reflective functioning (Fonagy, Steele, Steele, Moran, & Higgitt, 1991). Later the coding system was applied to analysis of descriptions of the self as parent and the child in the current parent-child relationship using transcripts of the Parent Development Interview (PDI; Aber, Slade, Berger, Bresney, & Caplan, 1985) with a focus on the frequency, content, and coherence of mind-related speech (Zeegers, Colonnesi, Stam, & Meins, 2017). The assessment of Insightfulness takes a different approach; caregiver inferences about the motives underpinning child behavior are assessed by interviewing parents as they watch video footage of their child (Oppenheim, Koren-Karie, & Sagi, 2001).
Consistent with Meins’ proposition that mind-mindedness is at the interface of representations and behavior and shares theoretical origins with the reflective functioning scale for the AAI (Meins, 1999), Rosenblum, McDonough, Sameroff, and Muzik (2008) have proposed that mind-mindedness might be considered a type of reflective functioning in action; that is, mothers’ explicit linguistic attributions of mental states to their infants may depend on their capacity to mentalize more generally. Meins, Fernyhough, and Harris-Waller (2014), however, emphasized the crucial distinction between competence in mentalizing abilities and the proclivity to use this capacity spontaneously to describe and explain behavior. One key way in which mind-mindedness differs is that both reflective functioning and insightfulness are assessed through invitations to the caregiver to reflect about their child’s motivations and/or relationship, whereas mind-mindedness is based on caregivers’ spontaneous comments regarding child mental states. Further, it is the only one of the measures of parent mentalizing that can be assessed from live parent-child interaction. A recent three level meta-analysis pooling data from these parent mentalizing measures (Zeegers et al., 2017) has demonstrated that parent ability to tune in to the child’s mental states predicts child attachment security and parent sensitivity, and that sensitivity mediates the relation between mentalizing and child attachment security. As we describe later, however, there is little empirical evidence regarding the similarities or differences among the various mentalizing constructs (Zeegers et al., 2017).
Section snippets
Approaches to assessing mind-mindedness
There are two approaches to measurement of mind-mindedness that rely on analysis of verbatim transcripts of caregiver discourse. The first is representational (hereafter “interview measure”) and assesses caregivers’ spontaneous tendency to include mental states when given an unstructured invitation to describe their child (Meins, Fernyhough, Russell, & Clark-Carter, 1998). The second (“observational measure”) is scored from parents’ verbal references to infant mental states during interaction
Narrative review
A systematic search of six electronic databases (PsycINFO, MedLine, Scopus, Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cinahl) was undertaken using the keywords ‘mind-mindedness’ and ‘mind mindedness’. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted the key research laboratories to access in press papers. The search yielded 90 papers of which 67 met the inclusion criteria described below. The last search updates were completed in June 2017. Because there are two different approaches
Mind-mindedness, attachment and sensitivity: does mind-mindedness explain the transmission gap?
Attempts to explain intergenerational transmission of attachment quality are at the heart of attachment theory and research. Although maternal sensitivity has been proposed as the likely behavioral mechanism through which maternal attachment state of mind is transmitted to the child (Fonagy & Target, 1997), the variance in attachment security explained by sensitivity is modest (De Wolff and Van IJzendoorn, 1997, Van IJzendoorn, 1995, Verhage et al., 2016), with about 75% of the variance in
Mind-mindedness and child developmental outcomes
Parental mind-mindedness has also been examined in relation to child developmental outcomes, with a substantial body of research examining developing social understanding indexed by theory of mind, and some also considering earlier precursors of theory of mind. A small number of recent studies have also considered child language development, as well as child regulatory capacity including executive functioning, sleep, and behavior problems.
Mind-mindedness: nature of the construct
Meins (1999) raised a number of important research tasks in relation to the mind-mindedness construct, and among these was a need to establish whether mind-mindedness was “specific to attachment related constructs or simply a general trait in certain people” (p. 338). Sharp and Fonagy (2008) conceptualized mind-mindedness as an operationalization of parent mentalizing capacity that was expressed within the parent-child relationship. Meins et al., 2011, Meins et al., 2012 proposed that
Overview of empirical findings
So, has the mind-mindedness construct fulfilled its promises? The most robust evidence relates to its predictive validity in relation to individual differences in child theory of mind capacity. There is convergent evidence across different samples, and different child ages that appropriate mind-related comments during interactions with infants predict different aspects of later ToM capacity (including precursors of ToM) assessed between 2 and 5 years. Evidence linking parents’ mind-related
Conclusions and future directions
The body of research reviewed here suggests that mind-mindedness assessed in infancy might be an effective way of identifying parents who are doing what is needed to promote their child’s mentalizing capacities, secure attachment and, to an extent, language, behavioral and attention regulation. Given the verbal nature of mind-mindedness, we suggest that the potential for mind-mindedness to promote child language and cognitive development deserves more empirical attention. Research on
References (110)
- et al.
The Parent Development Interview
(1985) - et al.
Infant-mother attachment and social development: Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals
- et al.
Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation
(1978) - et al.
Links between antenatal attachment representations, postnatal mind-mindedness, and infant attachment security: A preliminary study of mothers and fathers
Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
(2007) - et al.
Continuity in mind-mindedness from pregnancy to the first year of life
Infant Behavior & Development
(2008) - et al.
Are adult mentalizing abilities associated with mind-mindedness?
International Journal of Behavioral Development
(2016) - et al.
Social factors in the development of early executive functioning: A closer look at the caregiving environment
Developmental Science
(2012) - et al.
From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning
Child Development
(2010) - et al.
Bridging the attachment transmission gap: The role of maternal mind-mindedness
International Journal of Behavioral Development
(2003) - et al.
Maternal mind-mindedness and children’s school readiness: A longitudinal study of developmental processes
Developmental Psychology
(2016)