A longitudinal study of foot ulceration and its risk factors in community-based patients with type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study
Introduction
Foot ulcers contribute significantly to the morbidity, mortality and cost associated with diabetes [8]. Accurate estimates of the prevalence and incidence of foot ulceration complicating type 2 diabetes have, however, been difficult to obtain [22], [30]. Available data from largely primary care studies suggest that the point prevalence of an active ulcer is up to 1.8% [17], [25], with an annual incidence ranging from 1.0% to 4.1% [37]. Such estimates can, however, be influenced by how foot ulcers are defined and ascertained, as well as by racial/ethnic differences in propensity to foot ulceration [2], [26] and between-sample differences in the management of diabetes and associated foot disease that are strongly influenced by socio-economic and behavioural factors [30].
Similarly, risk factors for diabetic foot ulcers have been incompletely characterised [13], [14], [32]. In recent meta-analyses [14], [32], diagnostic tests and physical signs that detect peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) and excessive plantar pressure were consistently associated with future diabetic foot ulceration, but the role of other candidate risk factors including HbA1c and ankle brachial index (ABI) were not. Differences in methodology including design (retrospective vs prospective), sources of patients (clinic vs community), attrition rates, durations of follow-up, definitions and ascertainment of foot ulcer, standardisation of data collection, cut-points for interpretation of diagnostic tests, and availability of potential explanatory variables for multivariate assessment of independent associates, are all barriers to effective pooling of data [14], [32]. Indeed, very few individual studies have included a full range of predictive variables in their analyses [32], a deficiency that has prompted international collaboration aimed at performing a more detailed systematic review [13].
Issues with ascertainment are highlighted by the observation that a significant proportion of diabetic patients can develop foot ulcers, including those that persist for more than three weeks, which heal without healthcare system intervention [21]. This reflects patient delay in seeking help [35], [36], especially by those who do not regard an ulcer as a serious complication of diabetes [36]. Given the problems associated with complete identification of all ulcers in a longitudinal natural history study and the inconsistent findings from previous studies, the aims of the present study were to (i) determine the prevalence and associates of foot ulceration in patients with type 2 diabetes from a large representative community-based cohort detected through active screening, and (ii) identify the incidence and predictors of all foot ulceration severe enough to require hospitalisation during up to 17 years of follow-up of the same cohort.
Section snippets
Patients
The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (FDS1) is a longitudinal observational cohort study of patients from a postcode-defined urban community of 120,097 people. Descriptions of recruitment, sample characteristics including classification of diabetes type and details of non-recruited patients have been published elsewhere [15]. Of 2258 diabetic patients identified from a variety of sources between April 1993 and June 1996, 1426 (63%) were recruited to FDS1 and 1296 had clinically-diagnosed type 2
Results
At baseline, the mean age of the 1296 patients was 64.0 ± 11.3 years, 48.6% were male, and they had a median [interquartile range] diabetes duration of 4.0 [1.0–9.0] years. Four participants had bilateral below-knee amputations at study entry and were excluded from further analysis. Sixteen of the remaining 1292 patients had a foot ulcer identified at FDS entry, representing an active foot ulcer prevalence of 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7–2.1%). The characteristics of the patients with foot ulcers at
Discussion
The present data, from a large, well characterised cohort with long-duration follow-up, confirm the important contribution of PSN to foot ulceration [14], [32], but also show that peripheral vascular disease is a significant independent risk factor. Neuropathy detected by the clinical MNSI score was associated with a substantial increase in risk of a prevalent foot ulcer but, in the more informative prospective arm of the study, it also predicted a more than two-fold increase in incident
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients and FDS staff for their involvement in the study, and staff at PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Fremantle Hospital for laboratory tests. The FDS was funded by the Raine Foundation University of Western Australia. MB is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and University of Western Australia Top-Up Award. TMED is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (Grant no. 1058260).
References (40)
- et al.
The influence of external precipitating factors and peripheral neuropathy on the development and outcome of diabetic foot ulcers
J Diabetes Complications
(1990) - et al.
Foot pathology and risk factors for diabetic foot disease in elderly men
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(1996) - et al.
The prevalence and determinants of foot ulceration in type II diabetic patients in a primary health care setting
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(1997) - et al.
Diabetic foot ulcers
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Pulse pressure and diurnal blood pressure variation: association with micro- and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes
Am J Hypertens
(2002) - et al.
Epidemiology of foot ulceration and amputation: can global variation be explained?
Med Clin North Am
(2013) - et al.
Patient and professional delay in the referral trajectory of patients with diabetic foot ulcers
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(2013) - et al.
The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort
Diabet Med
(2002) - et al.
Foot ulcer risk is lower in South-Asian and African-Caribbean compared with European diabetic patients in the U.K.: the North–West diabetes foot care study
Diabetes Care
(2005) - et al.
Multicenter study of the incidence of and predictive risk factors for diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration
Diabetes Care
(1998)
Alcohol consumption and other psycho-social conditions as important factors in the development of diabetic foot ulcers
Diabet Med
Diabetic retinopathy
N Engl J Med
Analysis of risk factors for neuropathic foot ulceration in diabetes mellitus
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc
The diabetic foot: grand overview, epidemiology and pathogenesis
Diabetes Metab Res Rev
A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer: the Seattle diabetic foot study
Diabetes Care
Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer occurrence using commonly available clinical information: the Seattle diabetic foot study
Diabetes Care
Mobile Australians: a moving target for epidemiologists
Med J Aust
Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors of foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)
BMC Med Res Methodol
Predicting foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
QJM
Cohort profile: the Fremantle Diabetes Study
Int J Epidemiol
Cited by (19)
Development and validation of an incidence risk prediction model for early foot ulcer in diabetes based on a high evidence systematic review and meta-analysis
2021, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeCan a combination of lifestyle and clinical characteristics explain the presence of foot ulcer in patients with diabetes?
2019, Journal of Diabetes and its ComplicationsCitation Excerpt :While history of DFUs or lower-extremity amputations were reported to be sufficient to identify those at high risk of developing DFU,8 the studies of patients with active DFU in large cohort (>200 participants) have been much less frequent.9–13 A previous study of patients with active DFU in Australian population have identified that the duration of diabetes, neuropathy and vascular insufficiencies are associated with DFU;9 while in a study on Asian population age and cigarette smoking were identified as characteristics of patients with DFU.10 Another study in North Europe found that age, male gender and macrovascular complications were associated factors for participants with a previous or current DFU.
Pie diabético. Abordaje multidisciplinar
2015, FMC Formacion Medica Continuada en Atencion PrimariaTemporal changes in the prevalence and associates of foot ulceration in type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study
2015, Journal of Diabetes and its ComplicationsCitation Excerpt :Since FDS2 patients were significantly more likely to have all of these risk factors apart from intermittent claudication and at least one impalpable pedal pulse, we propose that improvements in foot care since FDS1, such as government-funded podiatry access and earlier referral for peripheral arterial revascularization, have attenuated the potential for foot ulcers to develop in susceptible FDS2 patients. As we reported previously (Baba et al., 2014), our baseline foot ulcer prevalence of 1.2% in FDS1 ascertained by active screening was below the 1.4%–1.8% found in other studies conducted in the 1990s (Abbott et al., 2002; de Sonnaville, Colly, Wijkel, & Heine, 1997; Kumar et al., 1994), and the present data show that the prevalence in FDS2 (1.5%) was towards the bottom of this range. The relatively low frequency in our two cohorts probably reflects the community-based nature of the FDS compared with studies involving individuals recruited from primary or secondary care attendances (Abbott et al., 2002; de Sonnaville et al., 1997; Kumar et al., 1994).
What characteristics are most important in stratifying patients into groups with different risk of diabetic foot ulceration?
2024, Journal of Diabetes Investigation