Does home-based exercise improve body mass index in patients with type 2 diabetes?: Results of a feasibility trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2007.08.028Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims

This feasibility trial evaluated the use, safety, and short-term benefits of a home-based exercise intervention designed to increase physical activity among adults with diabetes.

Methods

Participants with type 2 diabetes in a group practice were recruited and randomly assigned to the home-based exercise intervention or usual care. Participants were given diabetes self-management education, instructed to exercise 30 min 5 days/week, and were followed for 3 months. The intervention contained three exercise routines (aerobic and resistance exercises). Outcomes included changes from baseline at 3 months between groups in body mass index (BMI), quality of life, A1C, and blood pressure.

Results

Seventy-six sedentary adults completed the study: 49% intervention group, 68% women, 47% black, mean age 56.6 ± 9.6 years. Using intention to treat analysis, a trend towards improvement between groups for BMI (mean change −0.4 versus 0.1, respectively; P = 0.06) was identified. Thirty-eight percent of the intervention group adhered to 80% of the exercise recommendation and significantly improved BMI (−1.07; P < 0.05). No other differences were detected between groups.

Conclusions

Home-based exercise interventions have potential to reduce BMI in patients with diabetes. The results provide variance estimates necessary to power a larger study of longer duration.

Introduction

Increases in physical activity have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of developing diabetes [1]. Among patients with diabetes, the benefits of regular physical activity have been well documented: improved glycemic control and insulin sensitivity [2], [3], [4], [5], reduced visceral and total fat [6], [7], [8] and improved physical functioning [9], [10]. Studies have shown that many beneficial effects can be achieved with activities of moderate intensity such as walking [3], [8], [11].

Regular physical activity has been recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes [12]. Adherence to these recommendations could improve glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid levels of many patients and thereby potentially improve patient outcomes and reduce the high morbidity, mortality, and costs of the disease. Despite the known benefits of physical activity, adherence to these recommendations remains poor [13], [14], [15]. Personal and environmental barriers to patient adherence have been identified [16]. Personal barriers include temperament, time, physical ailments, pain or discomfort when exercising, fear of injury, and misconceptions about exercise [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Environmental barriers include lack of physician guidance about exercise [24], lack of access to health clubs due to cost [23], [25], transportation problems [26], [27] and climate [18]. Randomized trials have revealed multiple benefits of physical activity [28]. Research is now needed to find effective methods of providing exercise ‘treatment’ that overcome barriers to exercise for patients with type 2 diabetes seeking care in primary care and community practice [29], [30], [31], [32].

To our knowledge, studies of the effect of coupling a simple home-based exercise video program with classroom education for improving cardiovascular risk factors have not been reported. We developed an exercise video intervention that overcame environmental and personal barriers, promoted benefits of exercise and provided realistic models and approaches to achieving exercise goals within the home. The purpose of this study was to conduct a feasibility trial for evaluation of the use, safety, and short-term benefits of this home-based exercise video program supplement to diabetes self-management education designed to increase physical activity among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

We conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial of sedentary adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from June 2004 through August 2005. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board on 11 May 2004 and monitored by an internal data safety monitoring committee. None of the authors have conflicts of interest with this study. Participants in the trial were recruited from outpatient settings in a large southern multi-specialty group practice. Inclusion criteria were age > 18

Results

Of the 155 patients screened, 94 met eligibility criteria and were randomized (using block randomization) to the intervention group (n = 45) or the usual care group (n = 49) (Fig. 1). Reasons for exclusion after screening included more than 150 min of physical activity a week (n = 43); co-morbid condition limiting physical activity (n = 7); participating in another clinical trial (n = 3); type 1 diabetes (n = 3); no interest in participating (n = 3), and no physician clearance for participation (n = 2).

Discussion

Despite an extensive body of evidence demonstrating health benefits of regular physical activity, a low percentage of patients with diabetes mellitus participate in routine physical activity, which can contribute to obesity and poor insulin sensitivity. The poor translation of research findings from randomized trials of physical activity into higher rates of physical activity may result from the inability of previous interventions to overcome personal and environmental barriers and improve

Limitations

The sample size was relatively small, and the intervention and follow-up period were of short duration. The results of this study provide the variance estimates necessary to power a larger study of longer duration. Although 38% of the intervention participants reported achieving at least 80% of the exercise recommendation with the use of the videotape, there are opportunities to improve this rate by increasing the variety, duration, and intensity of the exercise programs available on the

Acknowledgements

We thank the American Medical Group Association for their generous support of the project through the Models of Excellence Award program. Special thanks to Mackie Shilstone and the Audiovisual department at Ochsner for their efforts in developing and reproducing the exercise videotape. We are grateful for the assistance of Danielle Jenkins MPH and Ann Jannu PhD for their part in enrolling patients in the study. We also thank the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases at

References (56)

  • A.M. Kriska et al.

    Association of physical activity and serum insulin concentrations in two populations at high risk for type 2 diabetes but differing by MI

    Diabetes Care

    (2001)
  • H.T. Pigman et al.

    Role of exercise for type 2 diabetic patient management

    South. Med. J.

    (2002)
  • A. Mourier et al.

    Mobilization of visceral adipose tissue related to the improvement in insulin sensitivity in response to physical training in NIDDM. Effects of branched-chain amino acid supplements

    Diabetes Care

    (1997)
  • M.L. Irwin et al.

    Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • K. Yamanouchi et al.

    Daily walking combined with diet therapy is a useful means for obese NIDDM patients not only to reduce body weight but also to improve insulin sensitivity

    Diabetes Care

    (1995)
  • L.B. Caruso et al.

    What can we do to improve physical function in older persons with type 2 diabetes?

    J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.

    (2000)
  • M.A. Krousel-Wood et al.

    Multivariate model predicting physical functioning in geographically diverse diabetic patients

  • E.W. Gregg et al.

    Relationship of walking to mortality among US adults with diabetes

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (2003)
  • B. Zinman et al.

    American Diabetes Association. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes mellitus

    Diabetes Care

    (2003)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

    Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2 vols.

    (2000)
  • E.H. Morrato et al.

    Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003

    Diabetes Care

    (2007)
  • E.H. Morrato et al.

    Are health care professionals advising patients with diabetes or at risk for developing diabetes to exercise more?

    Diabetes Care

    (2006)
  • J. Dunlap, H.C. Barry, Overcoming exercise barriers in older adults, Physician Sportsmed. (1999) 15, available at:...
  • N.S. Wanko et al.

    Exercise preferences and barriers in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes

    Diabetes Educ.

    (2004)
  • J. Wilbur et al.

    Midlife women's adherence to home-based walking during maintenance

    Nurs. Res.

    (2005)
  • J.M. Heath et al.

    Prescribing exercise for frail elders

    J. Am. Board Fam. Pract.

    (2002)
  • K. O’Neill et al.

    Perceived barriers to physical activity by older adults

    Can. J. Public Health

    (1991)
  • Center for Disease Control

    Missed opportunities in preventive counseling for cardiovascular disease: United States, 1995

    MMWR

    (1998)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Éducation sur l'autogestion

      2013, Canadian Journal of Diabetes
    • Supervised group-exercise therapy versus home-based exercise therapy: Their effects on Quality of Life and cardiovascular risk factors in women with type 2 diabetes

      2016, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      With regard to glycaemic control, FBG and HbA1c levelsdecreased in both our groups. Like our own study, other studies that assessed the effect of the SET program on glycaemic control observed a decrease in HbA1c and FBG levels [8–10]. In the HET group, FBG and HbA1c also decreased significantly, a finding that is consistent with that of Krousel-Wood [10,11].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented, in part, at the 47th Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, American Heart Association, February 2007.

    View full text