Effects of mindfulness-based therapy for patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2016.02.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • To quantify the effects of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) in breast cancer patients.

  • MBT appears to be effective for breast cancer patients to manage negative emotions.

  • MBT might be beneficial in improving physical health of breast cancer patients.

  • MBT might be associated with better quality of life of breast cancer patients.

  • The evidence is supported but limited for the use of MBT in managing breast cancer.

Abstract

Objective

To quantify the effects of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) on physical health, psychological health and quality of life (QOL) in patients with breast cancer.

Method

Studies were identified through a systematic search of six electronic databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) examining the effects of MBT, versus a control group receiving no intervention on physical health, psychological health and QOL in breast cancer patients were included. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies using a quality-scoring instrument developed by Jadad et al. and extracted relevant information according to a predesigned extraction form. Data was analysed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Revman5.1.

Result

Finally, seven studies involving 951 patients were included. While limited in power, the results of meta-analysis indicated a positive effect of MBT in reducing anxiety [SMD −0.31, 95% CI −0.46 to −0.16, P < 0.0001], depression[SMD −1.13, 95% CI −1.85 to −0.41, P = 0.002], fear of recurrence[SMD −0.71, 95% CI −1.05 to −0.38, P < 0.0001], and fatigue[SMD −0.88, 95% CI −1.71 to −0.05, P = 0.04] associated with breast cancer, and improving emotional well-being [SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.19–0.58, P = 0.0001], physical function[SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.19–0.65, P = 0.0004], and physical health [SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.08–0.54, P = 0.009] in these patients. Although the effects on stress, spirituality, pain and sleep were in the expected direction, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, there is limited evidence from a narrative synthesis that MBT can improve QOL of breast cancer patients.

Conclusion

The present data indicate that MBT is a promising adjunctive therapy for patients with breast cancer. Due to some methodological flaws in the literature, further well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these preliminary estimates of effectiveness.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the most common cause of cancer death in females worldwide.1, 2 The potential causes of breast cancer remain unclear, despite intense studies were conducted. Recently, due to dramatic advances in medical care, early detection and improved diagnosis and treatment, more and more women are surviving breast cancer each year.3, 4, 5 Some researches reported that the 5-year survival rate for all stages of breast cancer has reached 85% or higher in many countries.4, 6, 7 However, for many breast cancer survivors, the disease itself, or its treatment (e.g., mastectomy, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and hormonal treatments, used alone or in combination), continues to have a profound impact on their daily life. They were not only inevitably experiencing a range of physical symptoms like pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances, but also dealing with the existential, psychological and social difficulties brought on by their situations.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 All of these may contribute to disease progression and recurrence, which have a substantial impact on an individual’s quality of life (QOL). However, patients may be reluctant to add further analgesics, hypnotics and antidepressants to the numerous agents necessary for basic management of breast cancer. Therefore, to improve the QOL of breast cancer survivors and negate the associated health burdens and risks, non-pharmacological methods, such as psychotherapy, complementary therapies and diet therapy, are required.15 One increasingly popular type of these methods to support people who are living with cancer is the mindfulness-based therapy (MBT).

MBT is a clinical application of principles found in Buddhism and other spiritual practices, involving the key element of nonjudgmental acceptance of physical pain or psychological distress, thereby reducing the tendency to ruminate over and catastrophise these experiences.16 Jon Kabat-Zinn, who introduced mindfulness techniques to the West in the nineteen eighties, has defined mindfulness as: ‘the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment’.17, 18 A conceptual model regarding mindfulness, identify ‘re-perceiving’, briefly explained as a process of change in relation to perceived experience, in turn leading to cognitive-behavioral changes in terms of altered self-regulation, to be the mechanism by which mindfulness training increases well-being.19

Two of the main mindfulness-based approaches include Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT).20 MBSR classically consists of instruction in three meditation techniques, namely breath awareness, body awareness, and dynamic yoga postures (mindful movement) taught in groups over 8 weeks.18 MBSR was originally developed for the management of chronic pain and now used widely to reduce psychological morbidity associated with chronic illnesses and to treat emotional and behavioral disorders.21 It is the most well researched MBT approach. MBCT is a derivative of MBSR, with a greater emphasis on cognitive techniques, designed for specific mental health conditions such as recurrent depression.22

Over recent years, the growing number of research projects investigating this approach attests to the benefits of mindfulness in helping cancer people improve their physical and mental health. Results from this relevant literature indicated that MBT was beneficial to reduce a variety of psychosocial cancer symptoms.23, 24, 25, 26 The effectiveness of MBT specifically for patients with breast cancer has been systematically reviewed by Cramer et al. and Zainal et al.27, 28 Zainal et al. examined the effects of MBSR solely on mental health of breast cancer patients.27 The results showed that MBSR had a positive effect on the reduction of stress, anxiety and depression. Similarly, Cramer et al. confirmed the positive impact of MBSR on decreasing anxiety and depression in patients with breast cancer.27 However, in both of these reviews, only two RCTs with small samples were included, which limited the possibility of pooling other outcomes. Until now, it is not entirely clear whether MBT is effective for patients with breast cancer.

Therefore, the present review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the evidence, specifically examining the effects of MBT on physical health, psychological health and QOL in patients with breast cancer, in order to inform decisions about recommendations for overall treatment.

Section snippets

Inclusion criteria

  • (1)

    Type of study was RCT.

  • (2)

    Participants included adults with a clinical diagnosis of breast cancer regardless of current treatment status.

  • (3)

    Type of interventions was MBT versus a control condition (care as usual, wait list or placebo). Note that studies had to examine MBT as a main intervention.

  • (4)

    The outcome variables must include at least one of the physical health, psychological health and QOL.

Literature search

We searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, SCI, EBSCO, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Chinese Digital

Study selection

Fig. 1 presents a flow diagram illustrating the studies selection process. The electronic searches identified 336 studies, of which 95 duplicates were excluded by Endnote software and 191 articles were clearly not relevant after the first screening. Fifty were retrieved in full text for in-depth consideration, and then 43 were excluded for the following reasons: multiple publications (n = 8), Non-RCTs (n = 2), subjects included other cancers (n = 9), interventions were not eligible (n = 14), outcomes

General findings

This systematic review provided a comprehensive summary of the currently available RCTs exploring the effects of MBT for reducing somatic symptoms related to disease and improving psychological health, and QOL in patients with breast cancer and survivors of the disease. Based on data from seven RCTs that compared these interventions to usual care and wait-list, we found a statistically significant effect size for anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, emotional well-being, fatigue, physical

Conclusion

Despite these weaknesses, our quantitative literature review of RCTs provides clear support for the efficacy of MBT as adjunctive treatments in the medical management of breast cancer. It is effective for breast cancer patients to manage negative emotions and to improve physical parameters, which is associated with some improvements in QOL. The patient samples of all studies reviewed for the current article consisted of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. So, the results of the present

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Sources of funding

None.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jinhui Tian at the Evidence-based Medicine Center of Lanzhou University for teaching us about the retrieval of medical literature and the meta-analysis method. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge Rebekah Whitley and Li Chen at the University of Kentucky for help in revising this paper.

References (36)

  • J. Ferlay et al.

    Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012

    Int J Cancer

    (2015)
  • D.A. Berry et al.

    Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • K. Belkic et al.

    Possibilities for improved early breast cancer detection by Pade-optimized magnetic resonance spectroscopy

    Israel Med Assoc J

    (2011)
  • R. Demicheli et al.

    Comparative benefit from small tumour size and adjuvant chemotherapy: clues for explaining breast cancer mortality decline

    BMC Cancer

    (2014)
  • C. Allemani et al.

    Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25, 676, 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • J. Savard et al.

    Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors for insomnia in the context of breast cancer

    Sleep

    (2001)
  • M.T. Hegel et al.

    Distress, psychiatric syndromes, and impairment of function in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer

    Cancer

    (2006)
  • S. Vargas et al.

    Sleep dysfunction and psychosocial adaptation among women undergoing treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer

    Psychooncology

    (2010)
  • Cited by (91)

    • Psychological Aspects of Breast Cancer

      2023, Psychiatric Clinics of North America
    • A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Pooled Meta-Analysis on Psychosocial Interventions for Improving Cancer-Related Fatigue

      2023, Seminars in Oncology Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Systematic reviews, including a mixture and unclassified psychosocial and complementary interventions,44,45 were excluded from the quantitative synthesis as the high clinical heterogeneity of the approaches may affect the effect size estimation of targeted interventions. Then 14 systematic reviews were eligible for the meta-analysis of meta-analyses.69-82 Six meta-analyses, retrieved from six systematic reviews,69-74 were pooled to estimate the effect of art therapies on CRF in a mixed cancer population.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text