Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW): An individualised questionnaire for evaluating outcome in cancer support care that includes complementary therapies☆
Section snippets
Background
Cancer support services have developed in response to the needs of people with cancer at all stages of their illness. They provide individualised patient-centred care that addresses spiritual, emotional, psychological and physical needs, and they often include complementary therapies and self-management techniques. In the UK, these services are provided in a number of different settings, which include multidisciplinary, independent clinic-based provision within NHS hospital care; hospice-based
Early pilots
The first work was done independently in two centres in the UK, The Cavendish Centre for Cancer Care in Sheffield and The Bristol Cancer Help Centre. Both centres made some changes to the MYMOP questionnaire and piloted their versions. The conclusions from these two projects were drawn together within a wider multidisciplinary team and led to the new questionnaire and further validation work. We will briefly describe the MYMOP questionnaire and these early pilots, before describing the new
Method
The MYCaW instrument has now been administered to patients and carers in each centre on a routine basis. This paper reports the findings from these exercises. At the Cavendish Centre for Cancer Care, the MYCaW questionnaire was used for the two years 2002 and 2003, with all new patients and carers. It was administered by the assessor towards the end of the first assessment interview and repeated at the follow-up assessment after the course of therapy. At the Bristol Cancer Help Centre MYCaW was
Discussion
The iterative process of several cycles of piloting, discussion and redesign has resulted in a questionnaire that is appropriate for the service offered, acceptable to patients, practitioners and researchers, and responsive to change. The goal of MYCaW as an individualised outcome tool is to give the patients a voice in assessing the impact of their care. This has been achieved by building on a previously validated patient-generated questionnaire and adding an open-ended question ‘Reflecting on
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the members of the MYCaW research team, including John Brazier, Jane Needham, Elaine Weatherley-Jones, Tony Webber and Jane Wilkinson. Our thanks also to staff and patients at the Cancer Support Centres that have used MYCaW and have provided feedback and encouragement.
References (15)
- et al.
Developing a tool to measure holistic practice: a missing dimension in outcomes measurement within complementary therapies
Complement Ther Med
(2000) - et al.
The Cavendish Centre for intergrated cancer care: assessment of patients’ needs and responses
Complement Ther Med
(2002) - et al.
Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire
J Clin Epidemiol
(1994) Measuring disease. A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales
(1995)Measurement of quality of life: how to choose an appropriate test
Cancer Topics
(1991)Cancer survivors and quality of life: a critical review of the literature
Oncol Nurs Forum
(2000)Seeking the patient's perspective: a qualitative assessment of EurQol, COOP-WONCA charts and MYMOP
Qual Life Res
(2004)
Cited by (103)
Benefit of inhalation aromatherapy as a complementary treatment for stress and anxiety in a clinical setting – A systematic review
2023, Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeSocial prescribing for migrants in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and call for evidence
2021, Journal of Migration and HealthFinding the value in oncology massage: A mixed-method study of cancer services and survivors in Australia
2020, Advances in Integrative Medicine
- ☆
Research sponsor: There has been no external funding for this research. The work was supported by the MRC Health Services Research Collaboration.