Elsevier

Clinical Psychology Review

Volume 56, August 2017, Pages 13-24
Clinical Psychology Review

Review
Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.002Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Wellbeing and other outcomes of carers of individual with psychosis lack research.

  • Psychoeducation improves carers' global morbidity, as a proxy measure to wellbeing.

  • Psychoeducation ameliorates caregiving-related outcomes, in particular burden.

  • 78% studies used group format, mean duration 20 weeks, mean contact time 17 h.

  • No significant associations identified between intervention factors and outcomes.

Abstract

Psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis are effective for improving compliance and preventing relapse. Whether carers benefit from these interventions has been little explored. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of psychoeducation for improving carers' outcomes, and potential treatment moderators. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English or Chinese in eight databases. Carers' outcomes included wellbeing, quality of life, global morbidities, burden, and expressed emotion. Thirty-two RCTs were included, examining 2858 carers. Intervention duration ranged from 4 to 52 weeks, and contact times ranged from 6 to 42 hours. At post intervention, findings were equivocal for carers' wellbeing (SMD 0.103, 95% CI − 0.186 to 0.392). Conversely, psychoeducation was superior in reducing carers' global morbidities (SMD − 0.230, 95% CI − 0.386 to − 0.075), perceived burden (SMD − 0.434, 95% CI − 0.567 to − 0.31), negative caregiving experiences (SMD − 0.210, 95% CI − 0.396 to − 0.025) and expressed emotion (SMD − 0.161, 95% CI − 0.367 to − 0.045). The lack of available data precluded meta-analysis of outcomes beyond short-term follow-up. Meta-regression revealed no significant associations between intervention modality, duration, or contact time and outcomes. Further research should focus on improving carers' outcomes in the longer-term and identifying factors to optimise intervention design.

Keywords

Psychoeducation
Family
Carers
Informal caring/caregiving
Psychosis
Systematic review

Cited by (0)