Integrating theory-driven and empirically-derived models of personality development and psychopathology: A proposal for DSM V
Research Highlights
- ►
A lack of consensus about dimensions underlying psychopathology hampers the development of DSM-V.
- ►
An integration of theory-driven and empirically-derived personality models is needed.
- ►
Such an approach possesses greater research and clinical utility than either approach alone.
Introduction
With plans underway for the fifth edition of the DSM, an increasing number of critical assessments of the current DSM classification system has been published (Blatt and Levy, 1998, Blatt and Luyten, 2010, Livesley, 2001, Millon, 2000, Parker, 2005, Westen et al., 2006, Widiger et al., 2006, Widiger and Trull, 2007). These assessments clearly indicate that we are on the brink of a new era in psychiatric diagnosis which may lead to a radical shift in the conceptualization, classification, and treatment of mental disorders (Brown and Barlow, 2005, Luyten and Blatt, 2007). In particular, several authors have pointed out that a number of the implicit and explicit assumptions underlying DSM-III and its successors has not been validated by empirical research (Blatt and Luyten, 2010, Luyten and Blatt, 2007, Westen et al., 2004). Most of these criticisms center on the categorical approach of DSM, arguing that future editions of the DSM should embrace a dimensional view of psychopathology (Spitzer et al., 2008, Widiger et al., 2006).
Despite the growing consensus that future editions of the DSM should adopt a dimensional perspective, considerable disagreement exists concerning the dimensions that should form the basis of a new classification system. Yet, there is increasing consensus that these dimensions should be based on contemporary theories of personality development and personality organization (Clark, 2005, Krueger et al., 2007, Watson, 2005). Broadly speaking, these personality theories fall into two categories, i.e., they are either more empirically-derived or more theory-driven personality theories. Among the more empirically-derived models, research has recently concentrated mainly on the Internalization–Externalization model (I/E; Achenbach, Krukowski, Dumenci & Ivanova, 2005), the Five Factor Model (FFM; McCrae & Costa, 1999), the Tripartite Model (Clark, 2005, Watson, 2005), and Livesley's dimensional personality model (Livesley, 1998, Livesley, 2008). Among the more theory-driven personality theories, Blatt's two polarities model of relatedness and self-definition (Blatt, 2008, Blatt and Shichman, 1983) and Beck's Sociotropy-Autonomy model (Beck, 1983, Beck, 1999), contemporary interpersonal models (e.g., Pincus, 2005, Wiggins, 1991), attachment approaches (e.g., Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007), and self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan, 2000, Ryan et al., 2006) have received much research attention.
Yet, unfortunately, empirically-derived and theory-driven theories of personality pathology have progressed relatively independently, resulting in a marked division between these dimensional models of personality development. Moreover, recent attempts to bridge the gap between psychiatric nosology and personality theories have primarily relied on empirically-derived dimensional models (Blatt and Luyten, 2010, Pincus, 2005). While this focus on empirically-derived personality theories may result in a psychometrically valid classification system, an exclusive focus on purely empirically-derived models may create a classification system that has little clinical utility and may not be the best model to study the nature and processes involved in the treatment of mental disorders (Blatt and Luyten, 2010, Fonagy, 2008).
In this paper, we argue that research findings increasingly suggest that an integration of theory-driven and empirically-derived models of personality development and organization is not only possible, but that it also may provide a more comprehensive and clinically-relevant approach to classification and diagnosis than either approach alone. First, we discuss the current divide between empirically-derived and theory-driven dimensional models of personality development and psychopathology, which is rooted in a historical divide between both approaches. We then review research findings indicating a growing empirical convergence among theory-driven models in suggesting that interpersonal relatedness and self-definition are central coordinates for understanding personality development and for organizing, classifying and treating psychological disorders. Next, we discuss research findings demonstrating the growing convergence among empirically-derived theories of personality development with theory-driven models of personality. Finally, we propose an integrative, hierarchically organized model of the development and nature of psychopathology, and discuss the implications of this model for research and clinical practice.
Section snippets
Theory-driven and empirically-derived models in psychiatric classification
From a historical perspective, psychiatric classification has always been characterized by two competing approaches (Luyten and Blatt, 2007, Pincus, 2005). On the one hand, theory-driven approaches emphasize that classification should be based on theoretical conceptions about the nature of psychopathology. This often involves specifying the nature of a number of dimensions that characterize psychopathology, as in Beck's (Beck, 1983) cognitive approach to personality disorders. From this
Contemporary theories of relatedness and self-definition
A remarkable convergence among a number of dominant theory-driven approaches to psychopathology suggests that relatedness and self-definition are two fundamental psychological dimensions that provide a theoretical matrix for the classification of psychopathology linking concepts of psychopathology to processes of personality development, variations in normal personality organization, as well as to mechanisms of therapeutic action (Blatt, 2008, Livesley, 1998, Livesley, 2001, Mikulincer and
Towards a hierarchical view of the development and nature of psychopathology: prototypes as an alternative to diagnostic categories
Based on the research reviewed, we propose that different forms of psychopathology can be situated within a hierarchical model that integrates theory-driven models that emphasize relatedness and self-definition as central coordinates in normal and disrupted personality development, with empirically-derived models of basic temperament and personality factors. Fig. 5 presents a schematic depiction of the proposed model. In the next sections, we outline the main properties of this model.
Implications for future research and clinical practice
Throughout this paper we have discussed implications of a combined theory-driven and empirically-derived approach for future research concerning the nature and classification of psychopathology. To summarize these implications, the proposed integrated prototype approach spells out a clear agenda for future research, consisting of (a) the identification of prototypical conflict-defense constellations, (b) locating these prototypes in the two-dimensional space spanned by relatedness and
Conclusions
Our paper integrates theory-driven and empirically-derived approaches toward personality development and the classification of psychopathology to identify new perspectives for integrating disparate literatures that link classification, assessment, prevention and treatment of psychopathology to principles of normal and disrupted personality development. We take a developmental perspective that emphasizes continuity in development throughout life, as well as continuity between normal personality
References (188)
- et al.
Self-criticism, dependency and the five factor model of personality in depression: assessing construct overlap
Personality and Individual Differences
(1998) - et al.
Parent–child interaction in the etiology of dependent and self-critical depression
Clinical Psychology Review
(1992) - et al.
Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition: two prototypes for depression
Clinical Psychology Review
(1992) - et al.
Empirical evaluation of the assumptions in identifying evidence based treatments in mental health
Clinical Psychology Review
(2005) - et al.
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and sociality
Progress in Brain Research
(2008) - et al.
Hierarchical models of personality and psychopathology: the case of self-criticism, neuroticism, and depression
Personality and Individual Differences
(2003) - et al.
Psychometric properties of revised sociotropy and autonomy scales in college students
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1995) - et al.
Broad and specific personality dimensions associated with major depression in a nationally representative sample
Comprehensive Psychiatry
(2004) Adult attachment patterns and individual psychotherapy: a review
Clinical Psychology Review
(2006)- et al.
Know yourself and you shall know the other... to a certain extent: multiple paths of influence of self-reflection on mindreading
Consciousness and Cognition
(2008)
Specific cognitive-personality vulnerability styles in depression and the five-factor model of personality
Personality and Individual Differences
Perfectionism and depressive symptoms 3 years later: negative social interactions, avoidant coping, and perceived social support as mediators
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Perfectionism and depressive symptom severity in major depressive disorder
Behavioral Research and Therapy
Neuropeptides and social behaviour: effects of oxytocin and vasopressin in humans
Progres in Brain Research
Endophenotypes: bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity
Biological Psychiatry
Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations
Psychological Bulletin
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Neurosis and Treatment: A Holistic Theory
The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion
Attachment styles among young adults: a four category model of attachment
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cognitive Therapy of Depression: New Perspectives
Cognitive Aspects of Personality Disorders and their Relation to Syndromal Disorders: A Psychoevolutionary Approach
Internalization and psychological development throughout the life cycle
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
Interpersonal Theory of Personality Disorders. The Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour and Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy
The sense of self in anorexia-nervosa patients: a psychoanalytically informed method for studying self-representation
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
A psychodynamic perspective on depression
Systematic empirical investigation of vulnerability to postpartum depression from a psychodynamic perspective: commentary on issues raised by Blum (2007)
Psychoanalytic Psychology
Levels of object representation in anaclitic and introjective depression
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
Experiences of Depression: Theoretical, Clinical and Research Perspectives
Polarities of Experience: Relatedness and Self-Definition in Personality Development, Psychopathology, and the Therapeutic Process
Mental representations in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process
Review of General Psychology
Internalization, separation-individuation, and the nature of therapeutic action
International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Two primary configurations of psychopathology and change in thought disorder in long-term, intensive, inpatient treatment of seriously disturbed young adults
American Journal of Psychiatry
Attachment and separateness: a dialectic model of the products and processes of psychological development
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
Therapeutic Change: An Object Relations Perspective
A Psychodynamic Approach to the Diagnosis of Psychopathology
A structural-developmental psychodynamic approach to psychopathology: two polarities of experience across the life span
Development and Psychopathology
Reactivating the Psychodynamic Approach to Classify Psychopathology
The psycho-dynamics of opiate addiction
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Antisocial Behavior and Personality Organization
Two primary configurations of psychopathology
Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought
Predictors of sustained therapeutic change
Psychotherapy Research
The dependent personality: developmental, social, and clinical perspectives
Psychological Bulletin
Dimensional versus categorical classification of mental disorders in the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and beyond: comment on the special section
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Personality development: stability and change
Annual Review of Psychology
Integrating biological measures into the design and evaluation of preventive interventions
Development and Psychopathology
Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology
Development and Psychopathology
Cited by (134)
Psychodynamic psychotherapy
2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3Allostatic load and systemic comorbidities in psychiatric disorders
2022, PsychoneuroendocrinologyChildhood maltreatment, personality vulnerability profiles, and borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescents
2022, Development and PsychopathologyThe Role of Temperament in the Classification and Treatment of Emotional Disorders: A Transdiagnostic Approach
2023, Toward a Science of Clinical Psychology: A Tribute to the Life and Works of Scott O. Lilienfeld