Elsevier

Clinical Psychology Review

Volume 28, Issue 8, December 2008, Pages 1472-1484
Clinical Psychology Review

Gender differences in contributions of emotion to psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.09.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Traditional conceptualizations of psychopathy highlight the importance of affective features as they relate to social deviance; however, little empirical research has actually investigated specific roles of emotion and emotion processing with respect to antisocial conduct. Antisocial personality disorder (APD), prevalent in forensic populations, is commonly associated with psychopathy despite the notable omission of such core affective features in its diagnosis. In this paper, we review the empirical literature on the contribution of emotion to psychopathy and APD, highlighting in particular research on emotion processing and various facets of emotional expression, including empathy and alexithymia. Research findings are discussed on gender differences in emotional functioning and their likely effects on the assessment of psychopathy and APD. Given the known gender differences in the expressions of emotion, the article concludes with recommendations to bridge research for different offender groups, including psychopathy and APD.

Section snippets

Conceptualization of psychopathy and its measurement

Hervey Cleckley (1941) characterized the prototypic psychopath in his seminal work, The Mask of Sanity. Presenting 16 specific criteria, Cleckley emphasized personality features of the syndrome as its core, with behavioral features being of lesser importance. Since this influential portrayal, researchers have attempted to produce measures of psychopathy that adequately capture the essence of Cleckley's description. Of these assessment tools, Hare, 1980, Hare, 1991, Hare, 2003 developed what is

Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder

APD is the one personality disorder most commonly associated with psychopathy. In fact, DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000, p. 702) uses the two terms interchangeably, stating that the pattern of behaviors that typifies APD “has also been referred to as psychopathy, sociopathy, or dissocial personality disorder.” Researchers have criticized the DSM-IV-TR's readiness to equate the two constructs when empirical evidence indicates that the constructs are very different.

Historically, the diagnosis of APD was

Gender differences in psychopathy

The volumes of research on psychopathy have almost exclusively focused on male offenders. While both Cleckley (1941) and Hare (1993) described case studies of female psychopaths that illustrate the construct's applicability to women, research has only shifted its focus to include female psychopathy in the last ten years. However, it remains unclear whether the construct or its assessment measures must be modified when applied to female offenders (Nicholls & Petrila, 2005). Stated otherwise,

Affective features of psychopathy

As previously noted, affective deficits are often viewed as the core characteristics of psychopathy and are associated with criminal, often violent, behaviors (e.g., Blair, 1995, Lykken, 1995). Affective features are operationalized with four PCL-R items: (a) lack of remorse or guilt, (b) shallow affect, (c) callousness and lack of empathy, and (d) failure to accept responsibility for one's actions. These four items characterize deficiencies that psychopathic individuals display with respect to

Conclusions and future directions

Research suggests that the role of emotion processing and emotional expression varies substantially between male and female offenders, particularly between those classified as psychopathic and those diagnosed with APD. Despite evidence of a construct drift between psychopathy and current conceptualizations of APD (Hare, 1996), few research studies have investigated competing hypotheses between psychopathic offenders and offenders with only APD, particularly with respect to affective features

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Nathan Gillard for his thoughtful comments in preparing this review paper.

References (136)

  • KronerD.G. et al.

    The Toronto Alexithymia Scale with incarcerated offenders

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1995)
  • MaltererM.B. et al.

    Psychopathy and trait emotional intelligence

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2008)
  • MattilaA.K. et al.

    Age is strongly associated with alexithymia in the general population

    Journal of Psychosomatic Research

    (2006)
  • NewmanJ.P. et al.

    Passive avoidance in psychopaths: The effects of reward

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1990)
  • ParkerJ.D.A. et al.

    The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale III: Reliability and factorial validity in a community population

    Journal of Psychosomatic Research

    (2003)
  • SalekinR.T.

    Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: Clinical lore or clinical reality?

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2002)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2nd ed.)

    (1968)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.)

    (1980)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.)

    (1994)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; text revision)

    (2000)
  • BlairR.J.R.

    Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2005)
  • BlairR.J.R. et al.

    The psychopathic individual: A lack of responsiveness to distress cues?

    Psychophysiology

    (1997)
  • BlairR.J.R. et al.

    Turning a deaf ear to fear: Impaired recognition of vocal affect in psychopathic individuals

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (2002)
  • BoltD.M. et al.

    A multigroup item response theory analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist — Revised

    Psychological Assessment

    (2004)
  • BovassoG.B. et al.

    The prediction of violent and nonviolent criminal behavior in a methadone maintenance population

    Journal of Personality Disorders

    (2002)
  • CalvoM.G. et al.

    Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention

    Motivation and Emotion

    (2004)
  • CleckleyH.

    The mask of sanity

    (1941)
  • ClementsC.B. et al.

    The measurement of concern about victims: Empathy, victim advocacy and the Victim Concern Scale (VCS)

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    (2006)
  • CohenD. et al.

    Empathy in conduct-disordered and comparison youth

    Developmental Psychology

    (1996)
  • CookeD.J. et al.

    Psychopathy and antisocial behaviour: Clarifying the links. Keynote address presented at the International Conference Violence risk assessment and management: Bringing science and practice closer together

    (2001, November)
  • CookeD.J. et al.

    Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model

    Psychological Assessment

    (2001)
  • DavisM.H.

    Measuring differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • DayR. et al.

    Anomalous perceptual asymmetries for negative emotional stimuli in the psychopath

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1996)
  • DeeleyQ. et al.

    Facial emotion processing in criminal psychopathy

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • D'SilvaK. et al.

    Does treatment really make psychopaths worse? A review of the evidence

    Journal of Personality Disorders

    (2004)
  • EdensJ.F. et al.

    Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures

    Law and Human Behavior

    (2007)
  • EisenbergN. et al.

    Critical issues in the study of empathy

  • FernandezY.M. et al.

    Victim empathy, social self-esteem, and psychopathy in rapists

    Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment

    (2003)
  • ForouzanE. et al.

    Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females

    Behavioral Sciences and the Law

    (2005)
  • FuleroS.M.

    Review of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist — Revised

  • GiordanoP.C. et al.

    Gender and antisocial behavior

  • GorensteinE.E. et al.

    Disinhibitory psychopathology: A new perspective and model for research

    Psychological Review

    (1980)
  • GrannM.

    The PCL-R and gender

    European Journal of Psychological Assessment

    (2000)
  • HareR.D.

    The Hare Psychopathy Checklist — Revised

    (1991)
  • HareR.D.

    Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us

    (1993)
  • HareR.D.

    Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come

    Criminal Justice and Behavior

    (1996)
  • HareR.D.

    Technical manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist

    (2003)
  • HareR.D. et al.

    Psychopathy and the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1991)
  • HareR.D. et al.

    The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions

  • HarpurT.J. et al.

    Factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1988)
  • Cited by (62)

    • On the associations between indicators of resting arousal levels, physiological reactivity, sensation seeking, and psychopathic traits

      2019, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous research also strongly suggests gender differences exist in average levels of psychopathic traits, with male samples typically scoring higher than females (see Cale & Lilienfeld, 2002). Research also suggests, albeit less consistently, that there may be gender differences in some of the correlates of psychopathy and the salience of environmental etiological factors (Cale & Lilienfeld, 2002; Colins, Fanti, Salekin, & Andershed, 2017; Miller, Watts, & Jones, 2011; Rogstad & Rogers, 2008). Furthermore, research directly examining the relationship between HR and psychopathy measured continuously, in a nationally representative sample, found that controlling for age, gender, and race fully attenuated the association (Kavish, Fu, et al., 2018); however, research on HR reactivity has not provided evidence for gender differences (see Kelly, Tyrka, Anderson, Price, & Carpenter, 2008).

    • Callous-unemotional traits and brain structure: Sex-specific effects in anterior insula of typically-developing youths

      2018, NeuroImage: Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sex differences in insula structure and function, as well as sex differences in gray matter volume developmental trajectories, as mentioned above, may provide an explanation for this finding (Giedd and Rapoport, 2010; Lenroot et al., 2007). Furthermore, studies investigating the impact of CU-traits in DBD populations have almost exclusively focused on males, and therefore have not allowed a validation of the constructs employed in females (Rogstad and Rogers, 2008). It is a matter of ongoing debate whether differences in CU-traits between boys and girls represent true sex differences or whether the instruments, which have predominantly been developed in male samples, do not apply as well to females (Rogstad and Rogers, 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text