Adopting a population-level approach to parenting and family support interventions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Evidence-based treatments and preventive interventions in the child and family area have not met with widespread adoption by practitioners. Despite the high prevalence of child behavioral and emotional problems, many parents and families in need are not receiving or participating in services, and when they do, the most efficacious interventions are not what is usually provided. Simultaneously addressing the issues of low penetration and insufficient dissemination of evidence-based programming requires a population approach to parenting and family support and intervention. Process issues are important, particularly in relation to engagement of stakeholders, recruitment of practitioners, consideration of organizational factors, and use of media and communication strategies. This article discusses why there is a need for a population-based approach, provides a framework of how to conceptualize such an approach, and describes an example from our own work of a recently initiated prevention trial that illustrates a population-based approach in action. The rationale, structure, and goals of the Triple P System Population Trial are described in the context of the aforementioned population framework.

Introduction

In both the prevention and treatment arenas, there is an accelerating emphasis on the promulgation of evidence-based interventions for the problems of children and families (Biglan et al., 2003, Kazdin, 1991, Ollendick and King, 2004, Prinz and Connell, 1997). The field of clinical psychology has approached this problem primarily, though not surprisingly, from a clinical perspective focusing on individual children and families. An alternative approach focuses on families from a population and public health perspective. Applying a public health perspective to child and family intervention, a relatively new, innovative, and potentially paradigm-shifting approach is to adopt population-wide strategies that seek to optimize impact and reach larger segments of the child/family population (Sanders et al., 2002, Spoth et al., 2002).

The process issues in a population approach to intervention differ substantially from therapy process issues. Population-based prevention, which is truly a paradigm shift for psychosocial interventions, necessitates the consideration of other processes such as engagement of stakeholders and practitioners, navigating organizational factors, using media and communication strategies to engage the population to achieve sufficient penetration, and facilitating program implementation.

This article considers the rationales and basis for operating at a population level in the area of parenting and family-based interventions. The Section 1 discusses why there is an apparent need for a population-based approach. The Section 2 provides a framework of how to conceptualize such an approach. Finally, the Section 3 provides an example from our own work of a recently initiated prevention trial that illustrates a population-based approach in action.

Section snippets

Prevalence of child behavioral/emotional problems

Child behavioral and emotional problems are quite prevalent in the population, particularly among younger children. Surveys of parents indicate that as much as a quarter to a third of children in the general population exhibit behavioral and emotional problems that present parenting challenges and risk for subsequent adverse outcomes (Burns et al., 1999, Zubrick et al., 1995). Unfortunately, a high proportion of children with behavioral or emotional problems never receive either preventive or

Evidence of efficacy and effectiveness

The presumption underlying the deployment of population level interventions is that the component programs have shown evidence of efficacy and effectiveness. Going to scale at a population level, though potentially cost effective, is nonetheless a major investment that cannot be predicated on programs that have not been sufficiently validated.

The field is just beginning to formulate standards of evidence necessary for broad dissemination of an intervention program. For example, the Society for

Minimally sufficient programming

Population oriented intervention strategies by definition necessitate efficient programming. Treatment and preventive interventions for parents typically have fixed formats such that all families receive the same amount of programming whether needed or not. For example, some therapy programs for childhood conduct problems impose a set length of treatment (typically around 16 sessions), and some home visitation programs aim for a massive number of sessions for every parent (e.g., 50–75 sessions

A research example: the Triple P System Population Trial

An example of population-wide implementation of evidence-based programming for families is found in the Triple P System Population Trial (TPSPT), which illustrates how many of the aforementioned principles can be incorporated into interventions and scientific trials. The TPSPT, currently in progress, aims at a population level to strengthen parenting, reduce risk for child maltreatment, and reduce the incidence of early child behavior problems.

Conclusion

Operating at a population level to positively impact parents and their children requires a shift in our professional thinking. It is no longer sufficient to conduct efficacy trials on parenting and family-based interventions and treatments without considering how such programming can benefit larger segments of the population. The considerations offered here provide the beginnings of a conceptual framework for understanding, studying, and implementing population-based approaches to intervention.

References (26)

  • A.E. Kazdin

    Parent management training: Evidence, outcomes, and issues

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • T.E. Backer et al.

    Dissemination and adoption of innovative psychosocial interventions

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1986)
  • A. Bandura

    Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy

    Developmental Psychology

    (1989)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy in changing societies

    (1995)
  • D.H. Barlow

    Psychological interventions in the era of managed competition

    Clinical Psychology Science and Practice

    (1994)
  • D.H. Barlow et al.

    The dissemination of empirically supported treatments: A view to the future

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1999)
  • A. Biglan et al.

    The integration of research and practice in the prevention of youth problem behaviors

    American Psychologist

    (2003)
  • B.J. Burns et al.

    Effective treatment for mental disorders in children and adolescents

    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

    (1999)
  • P. Karoly

    Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (1993)
  • A.E. Kazdin

    Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1991)
  • R.J. McMahon

    Parent training

  • R.J. McMahon et al.

    Treatment of conduct problems in children and adolescents

  • G.E. Miller et al.

    The enhancement of social learning family interventions for childhood conduct disorder

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1990)
  • Cited by (133)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by grant funding (U17/CCU422317) from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    View full text