Elsevier

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volume 25, February 2019, Pages 6-10
Current Opinion in Psychology

Attachment orientations and emotion regulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Attachment orientations have important implications for emotion regulation and health.

  • Attachment-related individual differences in emotion regulation are evident in the brain.

  • Avoidant people's defenses are fragile and tend to collapse under stress.

  • Attachment insecurities are associated with deficits in neural structure associated with emotion regulation.

According to attachment theory, individual differences in the availability and responsiveness of close relationship partners, beginning in infancy, and the resulting formation of fairly stable attachment orientations are crucial for understanding the ways people experience and regulate emotions. In this article, we review what has been learned during the last decade about attachment-related individual differences in emotion regulation. We begin with a brief account of the hypothesized links between different forms of attachment insecurity (anxiety, avoidance) and strategies people use in regulating distress and coping with threatening events. We then review findings from correlational and experimental studies showing that individual differences in attachment orientation are reflected in cognitive, behavioral, and neural patterns of emotion regulation.

Section snippets

Attachment insecurities and emotion regulation: theoretical background

According to Bowlby [1, 4], the sense of attachment security (confidence that one is competent and lovable and that others will be responsive and supportive when needed) is a resilience resource in times of need and a building block of mental health and social adjustment. Mikulincer and Shaver [6••] reviewed extensive evidence showing that people who are more secure with respect to attachment are more optimistic about life and make less catastrophic appraisals of threats and dangers. They are

Empirical evidence linking attachment insecurities to emotion regulation

Attachment-related differences in emotion regulation have been extensively documented in studies of reactions to stressful events. In these studies, avoidant people are more likely to cope with threatening events by relying on cognitive distancing and emotional disengagement (e.g. [15, 16, 17, 18]). In contrast, attachment anxiety has been associated with heightened engagement in distress-exacerbating mental rumination  moody pondering, or thinking anxiously or gloomily about threatening events

Conclusions

Attachment-related individual differences in emotion regulation have been documented in a remarkable variety of behavioral and neuroscientific studies. These studies provide strong empirical support for Bowlby's [3] attachment theory and its extension into the realm of adult dispositions and relationships [6••]. However, more research is needed if we are to better understand the specific strategies and defenses anxious and avoidant people use in particular situations and the ways in which

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (49)

  • J. Bowlby

    A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory

    (1988)
  • M. Mikulincer et al.

    Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change

    (2016)
  • M. Mikulincer et al.

    Adult attachment and emotion regulation

  • P.R. Shaver et al.

    Attachment-related psychodynamics

    Attach Hum Dev

    (2002)
  • M. Main

    Cross-cultural studies of attachment organization: recent studies, changing methodologies, and the concept of conditional strategies

    Hum Dev

    (1990)
  • E. Berant et al.

    Mothers’ attachment style, their mental health, and their children's emotional vulnerabilities: a seven-year study of children with congenital heart disease

    J Pers

    (2008)
  • J. Cassidy

    Emotion regulation: influences of attachment relationships

    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev

    (1994)
  • C.R. Fraley et al.

    Adult romantic attachment: theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions

    Rev Gener Psychol

    (2000)
  • J. Cassidy et al.

    Avoidance and its relationship with other defensive processes

  • J. Cassidy et al.

    The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: theory and research

    Child Dev

    (1994)
  • M.T. Frías et al.

    Individualism and collectivism as moderators of the association between attachment insecurities, coping, and social support

    J Soc Pers Relationsh

    (2014)
  • D. Holmberg et al.

    Adult attachment styles and stressor severity as moderators of the coping sequence

    Pers Relationsh

    (2011)
  • K. Pascuzzo et al.

    Longitudinal association between adolescent attachment, adult romantic attachment, and emotion regulation strategies

    Attach Hum Dev

    (2013)
  • S.L. Shallcross et al.

    Social resources mediate the relations between attachment dimensions and distress following potentially traumatic events

    J Counsel Psychol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (301)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text