Elsevier

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volume 19, February 2018, Pages 22-27
Current Opinion in Psychology

The case against physical punishment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Physical punishment is associated with undesirable outcomes for children.

  • Evidence is strong that physical punishment causes undesirable child outcomes.

  • There is evidence that physical punishment is part of a family violence continuum.

  • Over 50 countries have instituted country level bans on physical punishment.

  • Child discipline is most effective when seen as a long-term teaching process.

We review the literature on parental physical punishment of children, laying out foundations of a case against physical punishment as a form of discipline. We consider the research on physical punishment finding that physical punishment is associated with a number of undesirable outcomes for children and adolescents. We pay special attention to questions of: parent effects versus child effects; whether parental use of physical punishment is moderated by family, neighborhood, or cultural context, and whether physical punishment can be considered to be part of a continuum of family violence. We close with recommendations for positive parenting policies and practices.

Section snippets

Background and introduction

The behavior of children is always of interest to parents, advocates for children, and researchers alike. All of these groups would like children to behave in ways that are prosocial, and would like to minimize the amount of children's behavior that is antisocial or aggressive. Physical punishment is one way that many parents have used in their attempts to control children’s aggressive behavior. Certainly, in the empirical research literature on parenting, one of the focal areas of research

Broad overview of empirical research on physical punishment

A large tradition of research has found that the parental use of physical punishment is associated with undesirable outcomes for children. Much of this research has made use of large broadly representative samples with longitudinal research designs [3, 4, 5••, 6•, 7]. The most comprehensive assessments of this literature can be found in large meta-analytic reviews [2, 8••]. A more recent review that examined 111 effect sizes from 75 studies, spanning 50 years of research, found that parents’

Plausible theoretical mechanisms

Theoretically, the discussion about the impact of physical punishment on children has largely centered around three theories: (1) attachment theory, (2) social learning theory, and (3) coercion theory. We discuss each theory below.

Parent effects and child effects

In debates over parental use of physical punishment, a great deal of attention has been focused on the question of whether a causal case can be made against physical punishment, or whether physical punishment is in fact elicited from parents by child behavior [22]. Any case against parental use of physical punishment is arguably less strong if punishment does lead to children's behavior problems but it is in fact a result of earlier child behavior.

Attention to such matters requires some

Moderation by neighborhood, parental warmth, culture, or race and ethnicity

Another question within the research literature concerns statistical moderation; that is to say, the question of whether the negative effects of corporal punishment are equally salient across social contexts. Theoretically, this might be considered a question of whether physical punishment would be less injurious in families where parents show warmth and affection, and in social contexts where physical punishment is more normative. Key contextual differences of potential concern in the research

Neighborhood context

Recently, there has been an increased interest in understanding the concurrent effects of the immediate environments associated with parents and family and the more distal social contexts of the communities and neighborhoods that underlie the course of child development [35]. Two lines of empirical inquiry have found the importance of neighborhood context in understanding both parental physical punishment and child developmental outcomes. The first stream of research suggests that the

Physical punishment as part of a continuum of violence

Much of the debate in the popular parenting literature concerning physical punishment, and in the empirical research literature as well, centers around the question of whether physical punishment should be considered part of a customary parenting disciplinary ‘tool kit’, or whether physical punishment should be considered a type of family violence, qualitatively similar to child physical abuse, though arguably somewhat less severe in degree. Theoretically, the idea is that in cases where

Toward positive parenting and positive policies

There is an ongoing global discussion on the importance of a violence-free environment for optimal child development [39••, 40]. Since its implementation in 2006, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child continues to urge the global movement towards legal elimination of all forms of physical punishment to ensure children's rights and dignity [41]. To date, almost all countries have ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and 52 nations have passed laws that prohibit physical

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (47)

  • S.J. Lee et al.

    Parental spanking of 1-year-old children and subsequent child protective services involvement

    Child Abuse Negl.

    (2014)
  • T.W. Smith, P., Marsden, M., Hout, J. Kim, General Social Surveys, 1972–2014, Mach. – Readable Data File Princ....
  • E.T. Gershoff et al.

    Spanking and child outcomes: old controversies and new meta-analyses

    J. Fam. Psychol.

    (2016)
  • L.J. Berlin et al.

    Correlates and consequences of spanking and verbal punishment for low-income White, African American, and Mexican American toddlers

    Child Dev.

    (2009)
  • E.T. Gershoff et al.

    Longitudinal links between spanking and children’s externalizing behaviors in a national sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American families

    Child Dev.

    (2012)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Longitudinal associations of neighborhood collective efficacy and maternal corporal punishment with behavior problems in early childhood

    Dev. Psychol.

    (2017)
  • D.B. Straus

    Spanking by parents and subsequent antisocial behavior of children

    Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.

    (1997)
  • M.A. Straus et al.

    Corporal punishment by mothers and development of children’s cognitive ability: a longitudinal study of two nationally representative age cohorts

    J. Aggress. Maltreatment Trauma

    (2009)
  • E.T. Gershoff

    Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2002)
  • E.T. Gershoff et al.

    Parent discipline practices in an international sample: associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness

    Child Dev.

    (2010)
  • J.E. Lansford et al.

    Physical discipline and children’s adjustment: cultural normativeness as a moderator

    Child Dev.

    (2005)
  • J.E. Lansford et al.

    Corporal punishment, maternal warmth, and child adjustment: a longitudinal study in eight countries

    J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol.

    (2014)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect

    Am. J. Orthopsychiatry

    (1982)
  • L.J. Berlin et al.

    Prevention and intervention programs for supporting early attachment security

  • R.P. Rohner

    The parental acceptance-rejection syndrome: universal correlates of perceived rejection

    Am. Psychol.

    (2004)
  • K. Maguire-Jack et al.

    Spanking and child development during the first 5 years of life

    Child Dev.

    (2012)
  • A. Bandura

    Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis

    (1973)
  • J.E. Lansford et al.

    Reciprocal relations between parents’ physical discipline and children’s externalizing behavior during middle childhood and adolescence

    Dev. Psychopathol.

    (2011)
  • M.J. MacKenzie et al.

    Spanking and children’s externalizing behavior across the first decade of life: evidence for transactional processes

    J. Youth Adolesc.

    (2014)
  • C.A. Taylor et al.

    Use of spanking for 3-year-old children and associated intimate partner aggression or violence

    Pediatrics

    (2010)
  • S. Fréchette et al.

    What is the link between corporal punishment and child physical abuse?

    J. Fam. Violence

    (2015)
  • G.R. Patterson

    Coercive Family Process

    (1982)
  • N. Baydar et al.

    Reciprocal relations between the trajectories of mothers’ harsh discipline, responsiveness and aggression in early childhood

    J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Prevalence of family violence and mental health and their relation to peer victimization: A representative study of adolescent students in Southwestern Uganda

      2019, Child Abuse and Neglect
      Citation Excerpt :

      In accordance with previous studies conducted in East-Africa, we also found that violent discipline was related to mental health problems (Hecker et al., 2014, 2016; Nkuba et al., 2019). Furthermore and in agreement with prior findings (Grogan-Kaylor et al., 2018), we found that violent discipline was also positively related with positive attitudes towards violent discipline among children. These findings support the notion that when societies accept the use of violence, then children raised in such communities will accept and rationalize the use of violence especially as a disciplinary strategy (Breen et al., 2015; Feinstein & Mwahombela, 2010; Grogan-Kaylor et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text