Stroke me for longer this touch feels too short: The effect of pleasant touch on temporal perception
Introduction
The ability to judge the passage of time in the range of seconds to minutes, termed interval timing, is a critical function that underlies a number of everyday behaviours such as crossing a road with oncoming traffic, or toasting bread under a grill (Wearden, 1999). Subjectively, the perceived duration of events can be distorted by the activities we perform and the concurrent emotions we experience. Research into the effects of emotion on time perception has mostly used visual or auditory stimuli as triggers, such as emotional facial expressions (Droit-Volet, Brunot, & Niedenthal, 2004), pictures (Angrilli, Cherubini, Pavese, & Manfredini, 1997) and sounds (Noulhiane, Mella, Samson, Ragot, & Pouthas, 2007). These are exteroceptive emotional triggers relating to stimuli that originate outside the body, but what is less understood is the effect of interoceptive stimuli on interval timing. Negative affective somatosensory stimulation (pain) has been shown to be effective in altering temporal perception (Hare, 1963, Ogden et al., 2015), but to date no studies have explored whether positive somatosensory stimulation (pleasant touch) influences the perceived duration of time.
Pleasant touch is hypothesised to be coded by a system of recently identified unmyelinated peripheral nerves (the same class as nociceptors) called c-tactile afferents (CT) (McGlone, Wessberg, & Olausson, 2014). CT afferents are located around the vellus hair follicles found all over the hairy skin and are not present in glabrous skin (Vallbo, Olausson, & Wessberg, 1999). Maximal neural responding in these nerves occurs with tactile stimulation velocities of around 3 cm/s (Löken, Wessberg, Morrison, McGlone, & Olausson, 2009), which corresponds with the highest ratings of subjective pleasure to gentle touch (Essick et al., 2010). CTs project to the insular cortex (Olausson et al., 2002) and orbitofrontal cortex (Francis et al., 1999, Rolls et al., 2003) and they are purported to provide or support emotional, hormonal, and behavioural responses to skin-to-skin contact with conspecifics (Morrison, Loken, & Olausson, 2010). The insular cortex relays affective information to the frontal lobe (Craig, 2008) supporting the hypothesis that CTs code emotional rather than discriminative touch (Olausson et al., 2008). Stimulation, in a manner known to activate CT fibres (see Triscoli, Ackerley, & Sailer, 2014 for discussion), therefore offers a way to examine the effect of positive emotional touch on perceived duration, but we cannot rule out the contribution made by fast conducting myelinated touch nerves to the overall perception of touch.
The lengthening of perceived time with pain has been interpreted as a consequence of pain increasing arousal and amygdala activity, affecting the subsequent subcortical processing of duration (Gil & Droit-Volet, 2012). This results in increased output from the internal timing mechanism and a lengthening of subjective duration (Droit-Volet, 2013). An alternative explanation is that because both duration and self-representation are thought to be processed by the insular cortex (Craig, 2009, Wittman, 2009), concurrent activation of the insular cortex, both from temporal processing and self-representation, may distort perceived duration. The insular cortex continuously monitors homeostatic states, underpinning the neural processes involved in interoception by generating an “emotional moment in time” (Craig, 2002). It is therefore hypothesised that when timing a neutral stimulus, which does not evoke self-representation, anterior insular cortex activity may be limited to temporal processing and no distortion to time occurs. In contrast, when timing an interoceptive stimulus, such as the duration of a painful stimulus, the additional insular cortex activation produced by pain may lengthen perceived duration. Whilst this is theoretically plausible, it should be noted that it is yet to be confirmed empirically using neuroimaging.
Little is known about the way in which pleasant touch (i.e. that known to activate CT fibres i.e. low velocity/force) influences wider cognitive processing (Essick et al., 2010, Leonard et al., 2014). Inferences can however be made about how perceived duration may be effected. Activation of the insular cortex (Olausson et al., 2002) and orbitofrontal cortex (Francis et al., 1999, Rolls et al., 2003) from touch known to stimulate CTs suggests that arousal may be increased, perhaps through an increase in positive affect. This may, therefore, lengthen perceived duration as with negative visual and auditory emotional triggers (Droit-Volet & Meck, 2007).
However, recent research exploring the effect of touch on delay-of-gratification in children suggests that the experience of friendly touch lengthens the amount of time that children are willing to wait to receive a reward (Leonard et al., 2014). The authors suggest that this is consistent with a touch-based distortion to time shortening the perceived wait-time i.e. children think that less time has passed than actually has and are therefore willing to wait for longer. Thus, pleasant touch may shorten perceived duration. This would be consistent with previous reports of shorter perceived durations for positively valenced visual stimuli than negatively valenced visual stimuli (for example Angrilli et al., 1997, Buetti and Lleras, 2012), and for positively valenced auditory stimuli than neutral stimuli (Droit-Volet, Ramos, Bueno, & Bigand, 2013). A shortening of perceived duration may be observed because attention capture by touch (Lloyd, Bolanowski, Howard, & McGlone, 1999) may reduce attention to time resulting in shorter, less accurate duration estimates (Zakay & Block, 1997).
The current study examined, for the first time, whether pleasant emotional tactile stimulation affects perceived duration. In doing so, it also offers one of the first examinations of whether stimulation known to activate CT afferents (amongst other myelinated afferents) can affect attentional and perceptual processing outside of a purely affective domain. Participants completed a verbal estimation of duration task whilst receiving pleasant, mildly unpleasant or no tactile stimulation (control). Of interest was the potential difference in duration estimates given whilst experiencing pleasant, unpleasant and no tactile stimulation. Based on the findings of Leonard et al. (2014) it was predicted that the experience of pleasant touch would result in shorter duration estimates than the experience of no touch or mildly unpleasant touch.
Section snippets
Participants
Twenty Liverpool John Moores University female undergraduates participated (Mage 23.90 years, SD 5.37). A solely female sample was used to prevent gender differences in somatosensory perception affecting the findings (Fillingim, King, Ribeiro-Dasilva, Rahim-Williams, & Riley, 2009). All participants gave written consent. The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee of Liverpool John Moores University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2008).
Tactile stimulation
Throughout the
Visual analogue scales
Table 1 shows mean VAS scores for the pleasant and unpleasant conditions. Stimulation in the pleasant condition was rated as significantly more pleasant t(19) = 5.64, p < .001, and was desired again significantly more t(19) = 9.00, p < .001 than in the unpleasant condition.
Temporal perception
Fig. 2 shows mean verbal estimates plotted against the target duration for the pleasant, unpleasant and control conditions. Examination of Fig. 2 shows that shorter estimates of duration were given in the pleasant than unpleasant or
Discussion
The results show that pleasant touch alters perceived duration. Participants produced significantly shorter, duration estimates when receiving pleasant touch than when receiving mildly unpleasant touch or no touch at all. Therefore, whilst previous research has demonstrated that pain lengthens perceived duration (Hare, 1963, Ogden et al., 2015), the findings of the current study show that pleasant touch shortens perceived duration of concurrent events. The absence of a difference between
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by an Experimental Psychology Society Summer Studentship awarded to Dr. Ruth Ogden and Leanne Redfern.
References (44)
- et al.
The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis
Brain and Language
(2004) - et al.
Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression
Neuron
(1996) - et al.
Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception
Acta Psychologica
(2009) Forebrain emotional asymmetry: A neuroanatomical basis?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2005)Time perceptions, emotions and mood disorders
Journal of Physiology – Paris
(2013)- et al.
How emotions colour our perception of time
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2007) - et al.
Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch
Neuroscience Biobehavioural Reviews
(2010) - et al.
Sex, gender, and pain: A review of recent clinical and experimental findings
Journal of Pain
(2009) - et al.
‘Time flies in the presence of angry faces’ … depending upon the temporal task used!
Acta Psychologica
(2011) - et al.
Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling
Neuron
(2014)
The effect of alcohol administration on human timing: A comparison of prospective timing, retrospective timing and passage of time judgements
Acta Psychologica
“Beyond the fields we know…”: Exploring and developing scalar timing theory
Behavioural Processes
The influence of affective factors on time perception
Perception and Psychophysics
Perceiving control over aversive and fearful events can alter how we experience those events: An investigation of time perception in spider-fearful individuals
Frontiers in Psychology
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Emotional moments across time: A possible neural basis for time perception in the anterior insula
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Interoception and emotion
Perception of the duration of emotional events
Cognition and Emotion
Music, emotion and time perception: The influence of subjective emotional valence and arousal
Frontiers in Psychology
The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas
NeuroReport
Scalar timing in memory
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Emotional time distortions: The fundamental role of arousal
Cognition and Emotion
Cited by (21)
Direct social perception of others’ subjective time
2021, Cognitive Systems ResearchCitation Excerpt :In another example, when an individual is exhibiting signs of stress (for example, shallow breathing, fast eye movements, tense posture), we may similarly be able to perceive that they are experiencing a slowed time (Kingma et al., 2020; Rankin et al., 2019). The same is true if we are watching someone grimace in pain, or clutch at an injured body part (Ogden, Moore, Redfern, & McGlone, 2015), or even hold an uncomfortable position (Duclos et al., 1989; Francisco C. Nather et al., 2011). Conversely, watching someone whose attention has been captured by positively valenced stimuli, for example, a good song (Droit-Volet et al., 2010), joyful images (Smith, McIver, Di Nella, & Crease, 2011), or talking with friends, we might perceive that their sense of time is likely compressed.
Strengths and weaknesses of affective touch studies over the lifetime: A systematic review
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Similarly, in 8 other studies in which the use of a brush was not included, experimenters employed objects with different textures to deliver affective touch, such as: silk, velvet, denim, cotton, leather, plastic, sandpaper, fur. All of the articles reported a preference toward affective stimuli delivered with soft, smooth materials (Ellingsen et al., 2014; Guest et al., 2011; Hua et al., 2008; Ogden et al., 2015; Pawling et al., 2017b; Shaikh et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2014; Wijaya et al., 2020). Studies comparing pleasantness ratings in response to stroking at different velocities delivered on different hairy skin sites pointed out that gentle tactile stimulations delivered at middle velocities (i.e. between 1 and 10 cm/s) are considered as more pleasant than slower and faster stroking across different hairy skin areas; For instance, Jönsson et al. (2015) compared soft stroking of two different hairy skin sites, namely the forearm and the thigh, and showed a similar inverted U shape for the pleasantness ratings as a function of the velocities in both the skin areas, with middle velocities (i.e. 1, 3 and 10 cm/s) being preferred to others.
The effect of increased parasympathetic activity on perceived duration
2019, Consciousness and CognitionCitation Excerpt :Evidence that increased PSNS is associated with a shortening of perceived time suggests that changes in PSNS activity may be the mechanism by which relaxation shortens perceived duration. Relaxation training (Droit-Volet, Fanget, & Dambrun, 2015), some specific variants of mindfulness meditation (see Droit-Volet et al., 2018 for discussion) and pleasant touch (Ogden, Moore, Redfern, & McGlone, 2015) have been shown to shorten the perceived duration of events. Relaxation training, such as that delivered by Droit-Volet et al. (2015) increases PSNS activity (Sakaibara et al., 1994).
Manipulating reinforcement probability changes the temporal overestimation of anticipated aversive stimuli
2024, Psychological ResearchThe effect of mindfulness meditation on the perceived duration of pain
2023, Journal of Cognitive PsychologyA Neuroscientific and Cognitive Literary Approach to the Treatment of Time in Calderón’s Autos sacramentales
2022, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience