Sculpting memory during sleep: concurrent consolidation and forgetting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.02.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Broad behavioural and neurophysiological support for consolidation during sleep.

  • Neurophysiological support for sleep enhancing forgetting and new learning.

  • Large amounts of information at encoding lead to sleep-induced forgetting.

  • At capacity limits sleep switches from consolidating details to gist abstraction.

  • Predictions: manipulating memory load at encoding to influence sleep processes.

There is compelling evidence that sleep actively supports the formation of long-lasting memory representations. Experimental cuing of memories proved that neural replay of representations during sleep plays a causal role for this consolidation, which has also been shown to promote neocortical synaptic plasticity and spine formation. Concurrently, sleep has been proposed to facilitate forgetting through processes of synaptic renormalisation. This view received indirect support by findings in humans of sleep enhancing TMS-evoked plasticity and capabilities for encoding new information. First direct behavioural evidence of sleep inducing forgetting has only recently emerged after encoding large amounts of stimuli in adults. We propose forgetting complements sleep-dependent consolidation and facilitates gist abstraction especially at high memory loads, when reactivation-based consolidation reaches capacity limits.

Introduction

The formation of long-term memory relies on the two distinct processes of encoding (or learning) and consolidation. Retrieval is a third process that contributes to memory formation by re-instating the stored information. Between encoding, that is the uptake of the information, and retrieval lies the period of retention, and already at the beginning of modern memory research it was proposed that during this retention period memories are not merely passively stored but that an active process of consolidation occurs [1], which has received wide support over the past century [2]. Especially, the idea that memory is consolidated during the brain’s offline periods of deep slow wave sleep has risen to a champion of consolidation theory (Figure 1, Figure 2) [3, 4, 5]. Just recently, in the neocortex, the formation of dendritic spines was observed, during sleep after learning a motor task, as a neural substrate of memory formation, which was positively related to task performance [6••].

At its outset, memory research mainly focused on forgetting [7]. Essentially, two forms of forgetting were proposed. The first argues that forgetting occurs due to interference, that is older memory traces are constantly being overwritten by newer encoding events. Consequently, a passive role of sleep protecting from interference has been claimed repeatedly since its first conceptualisation [8], even though this type of forgetting seems to play only a minor role for memories involving the hippocampal system [9]. The second claims that memory traces passively decay over time and this account, later on, was extended to include active decay processes [10]. Here also, sleep has been proposed to play a major role, renormalizing synaptic weights and balancing out potentiation occurring as a result of encoding information during wake (Figure 2) [11••].

Covering mainly the period from 2013 to now, we review the latest developments regarding sleep’s role for consolidation and forgetting. Initially, it seems difficult to reconcile these two accounts. To the contrary, building on our previous reasoning [4, 12] we will present a framework, derived from novel developments in the field, to explain how consolidation and forgetting work together to sculpt lasting memories from a day’s clay of episodic experiences. Ultimately, forgetting might arise as the fourth process of memory formation that enables the long-term function of the other three processes.

Section snippets

Strengthening memory during sleep

The hypothesis that during sleep memory benefits from the repeated replay of neuronal representations that were formed to encode information during prior wakefulness was induced from the initial finding that in rats hippocampal place cells that show correlated firing during wake encoding of a simple maze re-exhibit this correlated firing pattern during subsequent slow wave sleep (SWS) [13] and replay during sleep has recently been shown to predict reinstatement strength during retrieval [14].

Forgetting during sleep

The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis explains how the brain copes with the physiological demands of learning relying on potentiation of synaptic networks, which would lead to unsustainable demands in energy and space as well as escalating potentiation, if potentiation remained unchecked [11••]. There is, indeed, a net reduction in the amount of cortical dendritic spines found in adolescent rats’ (postnatal day 23–44) cortex after sleep, while there is an increase after wake [46]. Likewise the

Interactions between forgetting and consolidation

Altogether the last years have supplied a vast amount of behavioural support for the role of sleep in consolidating memories (see Ref. [54] for a comprehensive review). However, the notion of sleep promoting forgetting is mainly supported indirectly by neurophysiological evidence and hints from enhanced new learning after sleep, whereas direct behavioural evidence is largely missing. Nonetheless, in a recent laborious experiment we found initial support for sleep-induced forgetting in a

Concluding remarks

The present review aims to reconcile sleep-associated processes of consolidation and forgetting, and highlights their interaction bearing the potential for abstracting gist from large amounts of information. While the causal relationship between behavioural and neurobiological indicators of sleep-dependent memory consolidation has been investigated in detail during the last years, such a link is completely missing for forgetting during sleep. We argue that sleep-induced forgetting can only be

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; SFB 654 “Plasticity and Sleep”). GBF is currently receiving a personal stipend from the DFG to conduct research at the University College London (FE 1617/1-1).

References (72)

  • R.L. Gomez et al.

    Naps promote abstraction in language-learning infants

    Psychol Sci

    (2006)
  • J. Westermann et al.

    System consolidation during sleep—a common principle underlying psychological and immunological memory formation

    Trends Neurosci

    (2015)
  • D.M. Werchan et al.

    Generalizing memories over time: sleep and reinforcement facilitate transitive inference

    Neurobiol Learn Mem

    (2013)
  • A.H. Javadi et al.

    Sleep enhances a spatially-mediated generalisation of learned values

    Learn Mem

    (2015)
  • G.E. Müller et al.

    Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnis

    Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Ergänzungsband

    (1900)
  • J.L. McGaugh

    Memory—a century of consolidation

    Science

    (2000)
  • G.B. Feld et al.

    Sleep smart-optimizing sleep for declarative learning and memory

    Front Psychol

    (2015)
  • S. Diekelmann et al.

    The memory function of sleep

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2010)
  • D. Marr

    Simple memory: a theory for archicortex

    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

    (1971)
  • G. Yang et al.

    Sleep promotes branch-specific formation of dendritic spines after learning

    Science

    (2014)
  • H. Ebbinghaus

    Über das Gedächtnis

    (1885)
  • J.G. Jenkins et al.

    Obliviscence during sleep and waking

    Am J Psychol

    (1924)
  • T. Sadeh et al.

    Forgetting patterns differentiate between two forms of memory representation

    Psychol Sci

    (2016)
  • O. Hardt et al.

    Decay happens: the role of active forgetting in memory

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2013)
  • M.A. Wilson et al.

    Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep

    Science

    (1994)
  • D. Ji et al.

    Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep

    Nat Neurosci

    (2007)
  • B. Rasch et al.

    Odor cues during slow-wave sleep prompt declarative memory consolidation

    Science

    (2007)
  • D. Bendor et al.

    Biasing the content of hippocampal replay during sleep

    Nat Neurosci

    (2012)
  • T. Schreiner et al.

    Boosting vocabulary learning by verbal cueing during sleep

    Cereb Cortex

    (2014)
  • X. Hu et al.

    Cognitive neuroscience. Unlearning implicit social biases during sleep

    Science

    (2015)
  • K.K. Hauner et al.

    Stimulus-specific enhancement of fear extinction during slow-wave sleep

    Nat Neurosci

    (2013)
  • B.P. Staresina et al.

    Hierarchical nesting of slow oscillations, spindles and ripples in the human hippocampus during sleep

    Nat Neurosci

    (2015)
  • Z. Clemens et al.

    Temporal coupling of parahippocampal ripples, sleep spindles and slow oscillations in humans

    Brain

    (2007)
  • R.G. Averkin et al.

    Identified cellular correlates of neocortical ripple and high-gamma oscillations during spindles of natural sleep

    Neuron

    (2016)
  • H.V. Ngo et al.

    Auditory closed-loop stimulation of the sleep slow oscillation enhances memory

    Neuron

    (2013)
  • H.V. Ngo et al.

    Driving sleep slow oscillations by auditory closed-loop stimulation—a self-limiting process

    J Neurosci

    (2015)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Electroencephalographic and neurophysiological changes

      2023, Encyclopedia of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
    • The facilitation of learning and memory by sleep

      2023, Encyclopedia of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
    • Biased confabulation in risky choice

      2022, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our results show a surprising pattern of memory intrusions, as we see increased recall of plausible but confabulated outcomes from the same source or “list”. One interesting possibility is that people are engaging in a form of generalization as seen in category and function learning (DeLosh et al., 1997) or gist abstraction (Feld & Born, 2017). This generalization enables them to confabulate recalls for each of the cues in line with the features of the category (e.g., a number between 100 and 190).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text