Vive les differences! Individual variation in neural mechanisms of executive control
Section snippets
Methodological considerations
A first issue to consider in conducting individual difference analyses is the size and nature of the sample. Although the typical sample size in cognitive neuroscience studies of executive control is in the range of 15–25 subjects, larger samples may be required in order to consistently detect individual difference effects [14]. The problem is twofold: first, studies with small sample sizes will tend to identify only a small fraction of population-level effects in any given sample; and second,
Individual difference approaches in cognitive neuroscience studies of executive control
The use of individual difference approaches has been employed to clarify the role of executive control mechanisms in a number of relevant cognitive and affective domains. Rather than attempt an exhaustive review, we use this space to highlight a few notable investigations that elegantly illustrate this general principle.
The origins of individual differences variation: genetics, environment, and neural mechanisms
A major goal of individual difference research is to identify the sources of variation underlying the observed variation of interest. Behavioral genetics studies have demonstrated that approximately half of the variance in executive control ability can be accounted for by heritable influences ([44, 45, 46••], but see [47••]). However, attempts to relate specific genetic polymorphisms directly to cognitive-behavioral differences in executive control function have met with little success, as most
Conclusion
The increased utilization of individual difference approaches in cognitive neuroscience research has advanced our understanding of how neural mechanisms of executive control contribute to a variety of domains, including working memory capacity, personality, motivation, and emotion regulation. Although individual difference approaches involve special methodological considerations and challenges, they represent a complementary approach to standard experimental manipulations that provides
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
References (70)
- et al.
The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis
Cogn Psychol
(2000) - et al.
The cognitive control of emotion
Trends Cogn Sci
(2005) - et al.
How does reward expectation influence cognition in the human brain?
J Cogn Neurosci
(2008) - et al.
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity
Nature
(2004) - et al.
Motivational influences on cognitive control: behavior, brain activation, and individual differences
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
(2008) - Jimura K, Locke HS, Braver TS: Prefrontal cortex mediation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts,...
- et al.
Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal–subcortical circuitry in major depression
J Neurosci
(2007) - et al.
Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin
J Exp Psychol Gen
(2008) - et al.
Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype influences neural processing of reward anticipation
Neuroimage
(2008) - et al.
Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance
J Comp Neurol
(2005)