Human time perception and its illusions
Introduction
The visual system brags a long history of parlaying illusions into an understanding of the neurobiology [1], but only recently has the study of temporal illusions begun to blossom. New illusions of duration, order, and simultaneity illustrate that temporal introspection can often be a poor guide to the timing of physical events in the world. Temporal judgments are constructions of the brain, and, as we will see below, surprisingly easy to manipulate experimentally [2•].
Time perception is a term that encompasses many scales. For the purpose of this review, we will address only illusions of time perception at the ‘automatic’ or ‘direct sensation’ time scales — that is, subsecond timing. Timings of longer scales, such as seconds, minutes, and months, are categorized as ‘cognitive’ and appear to be underpinned by entirely different neural mechanisms [3, 4, 5, 6].
Section snippets
Short interval durations
Duration judgments at short intervals are subject to several types of illusions. Here is a do-it-yourself demonstration to set the stage: look at your own eyes in a mirror and move your point of focus back and forth so that you are looking at your right eye, then at your left eye, and back again. Your eyes take tens of milliseconds to move ballistically from one position to the other — but here is the mystery: you never see your own eyes move. What happens to the gaps in time while your eyes are
Predictability modulates duration
The examples above appear to be related to low-level visual processes, but the story of subjective duration grows more interesting. When a stimulus is shown repeatedly, the first appearance is judged to have a longer duration than successive stimuli [19••, 20•, 21, 22]. Similarly, an ‘oddball’ stimulus in a repeated series will also be judged to have lasted longer than others of equal physical duration (Figure 1b) [19••, 23, 24, 25]. These dilations of perceived duration have been called a
Temporal order judgments dynamically recalibrate
A challenge for the brain is that afferent signals from different sensory modalities are processed at different speeds. When receiving signals from several modalities, how does the brain determine the timing correspondences? The answer seems to be that the brain dynamically recalibrates its expectations.
In 2002, Haggard and colleagues noticed that when a subject made a motor act (such as a button press), subsequent events (such as a beep 250 ms later) appeared to be ‘pulled’ slightly closer in
Is time one thing?
An open question is whether subjective time is a unitary phenomenon, or instead whether it is underpinned by separate neural mechanisms that usually work in concert but can be dissociated under the right circumstances. In other words, when one temporal judgment changes, do the others necessarily follow suit? We give three examples that indicate the answer is ‘no’.
First, returning to the Morrone et al. [8••] finding of duration compression around the time of a saccade (Figure 1a), can one assume
Current models and their discontents
The most traditional model proposed to account for interval passage over short time scales is a simple ‘counter’ model, in which internal pulses are collected up and integrated during the presence of a stimulus [46, 47]. This is thought to account for distortions in the following way: if we imagine that the brain has access to the roughly constant rate of its own information processing (say, one bit of internal information processed is interpreted as one unit of objective time having passed),
Conclusions
The recent renaissance of temporal illusions is ripe to trigger a crossdisciplinary approach, establishing a fertile middle ground in which to combine experimental techniques employing electrophysiology, psychophysics, EEG, fMRI, and computational modeling. Mechanisms are often exposed by their stresses and strains, and the hope is that these illusions will light the way to understanding general outstanding questions of time perception: how are the signals entering various brain regions at
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by NIH grant R01 NS053960 (DME).
References (52)
- et al.
Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity
Nature
(2001) Time, change, and motion: the effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception
Percept Psychophys
(1995)- et al.
Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming
Neuropsychologia
(2003) - et al.
Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming
Curr Opin Neurobiol
(1998) - et al.
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention
Annu Rev Neurosci
(1995) - et al.
Voluntary action and conscious awareness
Nat Neurosci
(2002) - et al.
Causality and the perception of time
Trends Cogn Sci
(2002) - et al.
Motor–sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation
Neuron
(2006) - et al.
Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli
Neurosci Lett
(2008) - et al.
Does time really slow down during a frightening event?
PLoS One
(2007)
Neural codes and distributed representations: foundations of neural computation
Neural Comput
Temporal information transformed into a spatial code by a neural network with realistic properties
Science
Spatially localized distortions of event time
Curr Biol
Visual illusions and neurobiology
Nat Rev Neurosci
Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time
J Neurosci
Neuropharmacological evidence for different timing mechanisms in humans
Q J Exp Psychol B
The neural basis of temporal processing
Annu Rev Neurosci
What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing
Nat Rev Neurosci
Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging
Curr Opin Neurobiol
Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space
Nat Neurosci
Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent time intervals
Nat Neurosci
Distortions of time during rapid eye movements
Nat Neurosci
Motion expands perceived time. On time perception in visual movement fields
Psychol Forsch
Influence of different sequences of optical stimuli on the estimation of duration of a given interval of time
Acta Psychol
Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals
J Exp Psychol
The Psychology of Time
Cited by (303)
How time flies: Time perception and intertemporal choice
2024, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental EconomicsDistinctive features of experiential time: Duration, speed and event density
2024, Consciousness and CognitionLost in time: Relocating the perception of duration outside the brain
2023, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsPerceived time expands and contracts within each heartbeat
2023, Current Biology