Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent?

doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.08.006

Cognitive Brain Research

Volume 18, Issue 1, December 2003, Pages 102-105

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.08.006 Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that reflexive shifts in spatial attention with eye movements (overt orienting) and without eye movements (covert orienting) can be dissociated [J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., in press]. Here, we show that a similar dissociation exists for voluntary shifts in overt and covert attention. Our study is consistent with general theories of attention that assume bottom-up (reflexive) processes and top-down (voluntary) processes converge on a common neural architecture.

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

This research was funded through grants to A.R. Hunt and to A. Kingstone from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and grants to A. Kingstone from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and the Human Frontiers Science Program. Data from this study were reported at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, in Ottawa, Ontario (Ennis and Kingstone, 1998). We are extremely grateful to Tricia Ennis for data

References (20)

H. Pashler
Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks
Cogn. Psychol.
(1989)
G. Rizzolatti et al.
Reorienting attention across horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention
Neuropsychologia
(1987)
P. Sumner et al.
Signals invisible to the collicular and magnocellular pathways can capture attention
Curr. Biol.
(2002)
M.L. Cheal et al.
Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination
Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A
(1991)
M.H. Grosbach et al.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
(2002)
H.L. Hawkins et al.
Visual attention modulates signal detectability
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
(1990)
J.E. Hoffman et al.
The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements
Percept. Psychophys.
(1995)
J.B. Hopfinger et al.
Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex
Psychol. Sci.
(1998)
J.B. Hopfinger et al.
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Nat. Neurosci.
(2000 (Mar.))
A.R. Hunt et al.
Inhibition of return: dissociating attentional and oculomotor components
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
(2003)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (158)

The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task
2022, Cognition
Citation Excerpt :
In the current study, we therefore investigated the mechanisms underlying target identification, notably by examining the potential involvement of eye movements during target selection. Current theories of visual orienting indicate that the identification process could either be achieved with overt shifts of attention and involve eye movements, or could be achieved with covert shifts of attention, not accompanied by eye movements (Posner & Cohen, 1980; see also Hunt & Kingstone, 2003). Although there is a large literature on eye movement behaviour during single-target visual search (for a review, see Eckstein, 2011), oculomotor dynamics during visual foraging are far less well known (Kosovicheva, Alaoui-Soce, & Wolfe, 2020; Tagu & Kristjánsson, 2020).
A critical question in visual foraging concerns the mechanisms driving the next target selection. Observers first identify a set of candidate targets, and then select the best option among these candidates. Recent evidence suggests that target selection relies on internal biases towards proximity (nearest target from the last selection), priming (target from the same category as the last selection) and value (target associated with high value). Here, we tested the role of eye movements in target selection, and notably whether disabling eye movements during target selection could affect search strategy. We asked observers to perform four foraging tasks differing by selection modality and target value. During gaze foraging, participants had to accurately fixate the targets to select them and could not anticipate the next selection with their eyes, while during mouse foraging they selected the targets with mouse clicks and were free to move their eyes. We moreover manipulated both target value and proximity. Our results revealed notable individual differences in search strategy, confirming the existence of internal biases towards value, proximity and priming. Critically, there were no differences in search strategy between mouse and gaze foraging, suggesting that disabling eye movements during target selection did not affect foraging behaviour. These results importantly suggest that overt orienting is not necessary for target selection. This study provides fundamental information for theoretical conceptions of attentional selection, and emphasizes the importance of covert attention for target selection during visual foraging.
To look or not to look: dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention
2021, Trends in Neurosciences
Attention is a central neural process that enables selective and efficient processing of visual information. Individuals can attend to specific visual information either overtly, by making an eye movement to an object of interest, or covertly, without moving their eyes. We review behavioral, neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and computational evidence of presaccadic attentional modulations that occur while preparing saccadic eye movements, and highlight their differences from those of covert spatial endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary) attention. We discuss recent studies and experimental procedures on how these different types of attention impact visual performance, alter appearance, differentially modulate the featural representation of basic visual dimensions (orientation and spatial frequency), engage different neural computations, and recruit partially distinct neural substrates. We conclude that presaccadic attention and covert attention are dissociable.
Microsaccades inhibition triggered by a repetitive visual distractor is not subject to habituation: Implications for the programming of reflexive saccades
2020, Cortex
The oculomotor capture triggered by a peripheral onset is subject to habituation, a basic form of learning consisting in a response decrement toward a repeatedly presented stimulus. However, it is unclear whether habituation of reflexive saccades takes place at the saccadic programming or execution stage (or both). To address this issue, we exploited the fact that during fixation the programming of a reflexive saccade exerts a robust but short-lasting phasic inhibition in the absolute microsaccadic frequency. Hence, if habituation of reflexive saccades occurs at the programming stage, then this should also affect the microsaccadic frequency, with a progressive reduction of the inhibitory phase. Conversely, if habituation occurs only at the later stage of saccade execution, the no change in the microsaccadic pattern is expected. Participants were repeatedly exposed to a peripheral onset distractor, and when eye movements were allowed, we replicated the oculomotor capture habituation. Crucially, however, when fixation was maintained the microsaccadic response did not change as exposure to the onset progressed, suggesting that habituation of reflexive saccades does not take place at the programming stage in the superior colliculus (SC), but at the later stage of saccade execution in the brainstem, where the competition between different saccades might be resolved. This scenario challenges one of the main assumptions of the competitive integration model for oculomotor control, which assumes that competition between exogenous and endogenous saccade programs occurs in the (SC). Our results and interpretation are instead in agreement with neurophysiological studies in non-human primates showing that saccadic adaption, another form of oculomotor plasticity, takes place downstream from the SC.
Decoding covert visual attention based on phase transfer entropy
2020, Physiology and Behavior
Covert attention to spatial and color features in the visual field is a relatively new control signal for brain-computer interfaces (BCI). To guide the processing resources to the related visual scene aspects, covert attention should be decoded from human brain. Here, a novel expert system is designed to decode covert visual attention based on the EEG signal provided from 15 subjects during a new task based on a change in lumination to two blue and orange color on the right and the left side of the screen, which is evaluated in two cases of binary and multi-class systems. For the first time, Phase transfer entropy (PTE) has been used in these systems, and after selecting the optimal decoding feature, the frequency band (8-13 Hz) Alpha and Beta1 (13-20 Hz) have the best performance compared to other frequency bands. Two-class classification accuracies of the designed system in two frequency bands (Alpha and Beta1) are 91.87% and 89.53%, respectively. Also, the accuracies are 65.11% and 63.38% for multi-class classification in specified frequency bands. In these frequency bands, the parietal and frontal lobes showed the most significant difference in comparison to the other lobes. Also, the obtained results declared that the expert system's performance in the Alpha band by the extracted features from the Posterior region is better than all frequency bands in other different brain regions. The performance of the proposed expert system by PTE is significantly better than the previous phase synchronization based features. Results have shown that the PTE feature performs better than the common methods for decoding covert visual attention.
Ever-ready for action: Spatial effects on motor system excitability
2020, Cortex
Modulation of excitability in the motor system can be observed before overt movements but also in response to covert invitations to act. We asked whether such changes can be induced in the absence of even covert motor instructions, namely, as a function of the location of the hand with reference to the body. Participants received single-pulse TMS over the motor cortex while they placed their contralateral hand (right hand in Experiment 1, left hand in Experiment 2) to the right or left of their body midline, and looked either at or away from their hand. In both experiments, greater excitability was observed when gaze was directed to the right. This finding is interpreted as a consequence of left brain lateralization of motor attention. Contrary to our expectations, we furthermore consistently observed greater excitability when gaze was directed away from the hand. To account for this finding, we introduce the concept of “surveillance attention” which, we speculate, modulates cortical gain, and thereby cortical excitability. Its function is to increase readiness to act in non-foveated regions of space. Such a process confers an advantage in environments, like those in which humans evolved, in which threatening stimuli may appear unexpectedly, and at any time.
WiFiTuned: Monitoring Engagement in Online Participation by Harmonizing WiFi and Audio
2023, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Short communicationCovert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent?

Abstract

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

Cogn. Psychol.

Neuropsychologia

Curr. Biol.

Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination

Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention

J. Cogn. Neurosci.

Visual attention modulates signal detectability

J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements

Percept. Psychophys.

Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex

Psychol. Sci.

The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control

Nat. Neurosci.

Inhibition of return: dissociating attentional and oculomotor components

J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

Short communication
Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent?