Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mental illness is underdiagnosed but observable in online contexts.

  • Characteristic language use patterns associated with depression have been identified and allow for the detection of mental illness with mixed performance.

  • Prediction accuracies fall between unaided clinician assessment and screening surveys.

  • No studies to date are based on gold-standard clinical diagnoses.

  • The findings are still preliminary and the field relatively nascent.

Although rates of diagnosing mental illness have improved over the past few decades, many cases remain undetected. Symptoms associated with mental illness are observable on Twitter, Facebook, and web forums, and automated methods are increasingly able to detect depression and other mental illnesses. In this paper, recent studies that aimed to predict mental illness using social media are reviewed. Mentally ill users have been identified using screening surveys, their public sharing of a diagnosis on Twitter, or by their membership in an online forum, and they were distinguishable from control users by patterns in their language and online activity. Automated detection methods may help to identify depressed or otherwise at-risk individuals through the large-scale passive monitoring of social media, and in the future may complement existing screening procedures.

Introduction

The widespread use of social media may provide opportunities to help reduce undiagnosed mental illness. A growing number of studies examine mental health within social media contexts, linking social media use and behavioral patterns with stress, anxiety, depression, suicidality, and other mental illnesses. The greatest number of studies of this kind focus on depression. Depression continues to be under-diagnosed, with roughly half the cases detected by primary care physicians [1] and only 13–49% receiving minimally adequate treatment [2].

Automated analysis of social media potentially provides methods for early detection. If an automated process could detect elevated depression scores in a user, that individual could be targeted for a more thorough assessment, and provided with further resources, support, and treatment. Studies to date have either examined how the use of social media sites correlates with mental illness in users [3] or attempted to detect mental illness through analysis of the content created by users. This review focuses on the latter: studies aimed at predicting mental illness using social media. We first consider methods used to predict depression, and then consider four approaches that have been used in the literature. We compare the different approaches, provide direction for future studies, and consider ethical issues.

Section snippets

Prediction methods

Automated analysis of social media is accomplished by building predictive models, which use ‘features,’ or variables that have been extracted from social media data. For example, commonly used features include users’ language encoded as frequencies of each word, time of posts, and other variables (see Figure 2). Features are then treated as independent variables in an algorithm (e.g. Linear Regression [4] with built in variable selection [5], or Support Vector Machines (SVM)) [6] to predict the

Assessment criteria

Several approaches have been studied for collecting social media data with associated information about the users’ mental health. Participants are either recruited to take a depression survey and share their Facebook or Twitter data (section A below), or data is collected from existing public online sources (sections B, C, and D below; see Figure 1). These sources include searching public Tweets for keywords to identify (and obtain all Tweets from) users who have shared their mental health

Comparison of studies across data sources

Our review has described four sources of data used to study and detect depression through social media. Here we compare these sources.

Recommendations for future studies

The greatest potential value of social media analysis may be the detection of otherwise undiagnosed cases. However, studies to date have not explicitly focused on successfully identifying people unaware of their mental health status.

In screening for depression, multi-stage screening strategies have been recommended [32, 35] as a means to alleviate the relatively low sensitivity (around 50%) and high false positive rate associated with assessments by non-psychiatric physicians [1, 32] or short

Ethical questions

The feasibility of social-media-based assessment of mental illness raises numerous ethical questions. Privacy is an ongoing concern. Employers and insurance companies, for example, may use these against the interests of those suffering from mental illness. As mental illnesses carry social stigma and may engender discrimination, data protection and ownership frameworks are needed to ensure users are not harmed [36]. Few users realize the amount of mental-health-related information that can be

Conclusion

The studies reviewed here suggest that depression and other mental illnesses are detectable on several online environments, but the generalizability of these studies to broader samples and gold standard clinical criteria has not been established. Advances in natural language processing and machine learning are making the prospect of large-scale screening of social media for at-risk individuals a near-future possibility. Ethical and legal questions about data ownership and protection, as well as

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Courtney Hagan for her help with editing the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Templeton Religion Trust (ID #TRT0048).

References (43)

  • M. De Choudhury et al.

    Predicting depression via social media

  • L.S. Radloff

    The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population

    Appl Psychol Meas

    (1977)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck depression inventory II

    San Antonio

    (1996)
  • A.G. Reece et al.

    Forecasting the Onset and Course of Mental Illness with Twitter Data

    (2016)
  • S. Tsugawa et al.

    Recognizing depression from twitter activity

  • M. De Choudhury et al.

    Characterizing and predicting postpartum depression from shared facebook data

  • H.A. Schwartz et al.

    Towards assessing changes in degree of depression through facebook

  • G. Coppersmith et al.

    CLPsych 2015 shared task: depression and PTSD on Twitter

  • P. Resnik et al.

    Beyond LDA: exploring supervised topic modeling for depression-related language in Twitter

  • D. Preotiuc-Pietro et al.

    The role of personality, age and gender in tweeting about mental illnesses

  • T. Pedersen

    Screening Twitter users for depression and PTSD with lexical decision lists

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text