Prospective Quality of Life Study of South African Women Undergoing Treatment for Advanced-stage Cervical Cancer
Introduction
Cervical cancer remains common in developing countries, where the majority of cases occur.1 In these developing countries, a high incidence of advanced-stage cervical cancer is found. The advanced stage is not amenable to surgery, and radiation therapy has been the treatment of choice.2 In 1995, on the basis of 5 randomized controlled trials, the National Cancer Institute recommended that chemoradiation therapy be the preferred treatment for advanced-stage cervical cancer.3 A meta-analysis by Green et al4 of available studies showed a 5-year survival benefit of 29% in all stages of cervical cancer for chemoradiation therapy compared with radiation therapy. In a separate meta-analysis, Lukka et al5 calculated a 26% survival benefit, but subsequent limitations—for example, omission of unpublished studies—challenged this finding.5, 6 A Cochrane review calculated a survival benefit of 13% across all stages of cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy.7 Limitations in all of these meta-analyses were differences in study designs, accrual rates, and treatment schedules. Additional limitations included heterogeneity of the control arms of the studies, including the use of previously conducted studies as controls. These limitations were addressed by performing an individual patient data analysis. This individual patient data analysis found there was a 9% survival benefit with chemoradiation therapy in all stages of cervical cancer. The effect of chemoradiation therapy on survival decreased with increasing tumor stage, with estimated absolute survival benefits of 10% (stage IA−IIA), 7% (stage IIB), and 3% (stage III−IVA) at 5 years.8
Despite increased toxicity, chemoradiation therapy is still widely accepted.9 The increased toxicity relates to specifically increased grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity (2-fold increases) and gastrointestinal (3-fold increases) events in the chemoradiation therapy group.10 The presence of physician-recorded toxicity correlates poorly with patient-reported quality of life.11 A meta-analysis of chemoradiation therapy toxicity suggests that although the acute toxicity was acceptable, additional studies on the toxicity-related impact on quality of life are needed.10 The present study aims to describe the impact on quality of life of radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy for women with cervical cancer treated at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.
Section snippets
Inclusion Criteria
Newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients referred to the Unit of Gynaecologic Oncology, Tygerberg Hospital were approached to participate in the study. The unit is 1 of the 2 tertiary referral units for public-sector patients of the Western Cape Province. The Western Cape Province has a population of 5.8 million. The majority of the population (85%) does not have private insurance and are dependent on the public facilities provided by the 2 tertiary hospitals (Tygerberg Hospital and Grootte
Demographic Data
A total of 219 women completed pretreatment questionnaires, 134 post treatment, and 96 at 3-month follow-up visit. The total study group had an incidence of 22% positive HIV status. There was a significant difference in loss to follow-up between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients (Figure 1). The women undergoing radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy were further analyzed. Mean ages of the 2 treatment groups were similar. The radiation therapy group had significantly more pensioners
Discussion
The study on women treated for cervical cancer at Tygerberg Hospital found demographic differences between women treated with radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy. Monthly incomes were similar, but there were more women with incomes below the poverty line in the radiation therapy group. Black pensioners underwent radiation therapy more than chemoradiation therapy. The stage distribution was significantly different among the treatment groups, and radiation therapy was used more in stage
Conclusions
Chemoradiation therapy is an appropriate treatment in selected patients. The enhancement of quality of life of women with cervical cancer treated with radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy is of a similar magnitude in the majority of quality of life domains. In selected domains, chemoradiation therapy is associated with better improvement in quality of life than radiation therapy. Selection bias exists in the initial selection of patients to receive either therapy. This bias is related
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article.
Acknowledgments
This research is part of a PhD thesis (G. C. Du Toit) with promotor Prof. T. F. Kruger, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University. The members of the Unit of Gynaecological Oncology, Tygerberg Hospital, and the head of the unit, Prof. M. H. Botha, are acknowledged for their assistance. G. C. Du Toit planned the study protocol, collected the data, and wrote the article. M. Kidd performed the statistical analysis.
References (19)
- et al.
Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008
Ann Oncol
(2011) - et al.
Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
(2002) Concurrent Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy plus Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
(2004)- et al.
Late complications from chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: reflections from cervical cancer survivors 10 years after the national cancer institute alert
Clin Oncol
(2010) - et al.
A systematic review of acute and late toxicity of concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer
Radiother Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Radiation therapy infrastructure and human resources in low-and middle-income countries: present status and projections for 2020
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2014) - et al.
Clinical prognostic parameters in Stage III cervical carcinoma
S Afr Med J
(1997) - National Cancer Institute. Treatment Option Overview Standard treatments for patients with cervical cancer....
Cited by (20)
Finding myself as a cervical cancer survivor: A qualitative study
2019, European Journal of Oncology NursingCitation Excerpt :It was observed that most of the participants were single, followed by cohabitating, divorced, and once married, contrary to previous findings in which the predominant marital statuses were married and single (Parra and Carrillo, 2011), and others that have found married to be the most common marital status of participants in a sample from Cartagena, Colombia (Castillo et al., 2015). On the other hand, Campbell et al. (2015) found in a sample from South Africa that the most common marital status was single, followed by married. All of the above denote that having support from one partner grants emotional stability and courage in facing the disease.
Sexual function in South African women treated for cervical cancer
2019, International Journal of Africa Nursing SciencesCitation Excerpt :However, the mean age of our sample (45.7 years) was younger than the mean age of 50 found by both Snyman and Herbst (2013) and Du Toit and Kidd (2015) and the age of 53 described in the study of Kaila and Maree (2018). Similar to our study, most of the women in the studies conducted in Gauteng Province (Snyman & Herbst, 2013; Kaila & Maree, 2018) were single, which is in contrast with the study conducted in the Western Cape (Du Toit & Kidd, 2015) where a larger percentage of women were married and widowed. The literacy level of our respondents was comparable to the study of Kaila and Maree (2018) and higher than the participants in the study of Snyman and Herbst (2013).
Supportive care needs and quality of life of patients with gynecological cancer undergoing therapy
2018, Enfermeria ClinicaCitation Excerpt :The QOL of cervical cancer patients is affected by general health status and good relationships between the patients and healthcare professionals13. Cervical cancer patients receiving chemotherapy may experience a number of side effects, such as pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and poor appetite, and they affect the QOL of these patients14. Poor management of the treatment's side effects and inadequate self-care negatively affect the QOL of patients6,15.
An exploration into the level and characteristics of pain experienced by South African women treated for cervical cancer
2018, International Journal of Africa Nursing SciencesCitation Excerpt :Factors such as lack of knowledge of cervical cancer and the importance of screening play an additional role resulting in screening coverage as low as 13% (Snyman, 2012; Snyman & Herbst, 2013). Similar to the rest of Africa, the majority of South African women present with advanced disease (Anorlu, 2008; du Toit & Kidd, 2015). Snyman and Herbst (2013), in a study conducted at a large South African hospital found more than 50% women presented with Stage IIIB cervical cancer, which means the cancer has spread to the pelvic wall and/or caused hydronephrosis, or a non-functioning kidney (World Health Organization, 2006).
Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
2023, Medicina (Lithuania)