Elsevier

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volume 122, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages 2067-2070
Clinical Neurophysiology

Factor analysis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire in relation to nerve conduction studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to assess the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) structure and its relation to nerve conduction studies (NCS).

Methods

A total of 403 patients with clinical and/or electrophysiological definition of CTS were evaluated with the instrument. The structure of the questionnaire was assessed by means of factor analysis. Factors obtained were compared with NCS.

Results

Factor analysis showed that three factors represented nearly 60% of the variance of the instrument. Factor one is related to all the function domain questions and to the weakness and difficulty in grasping questions of the symptom domain; factor two to questions that assess numbness and tingling, and to the pain-awakening question of the symptom domain; and factor three, to pain questions of the symptom domain. Factor two had a stronger correlation with latencies of NCS and with the neurophysiological scale than the other two factors.

Conclusions

BCTQ assesses function and symptoms in patients with CTS by means of questions related to numbness and tingling sensation, pain and functional status. Questions related to numbness and tingling (factor two) better reflected the pathophysiology of the median nerve.

Significance

Factor-2 sensory-related questions of BCTQ may be more useful in diagnosis, follow-up and assessing therapeutic outcome in CTS.

Highlights

► Based on factor analysis, the variance of Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire can be represented by three separate factors: functional status (factor one), sensory symptoms (factor two) and pain (factor three). ► Questions relating to numbness and tingling (factor two) had a strong and direct statistical correlation with sensory and motor distal latencies of the median nerve. ► Questions related to sensory symptoms are most useful to determine the severity of disease of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and to evaluate outcomes.

Introduction

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a common complaint in primary setting with 4% estimated prevalence in general population (Atroshi et al., 1999). Diagnosis relies on clinical examination and nerve conduction studies (NCS), although these studies are not essential for CTS case definition. In addition to an accurate diagnosis, it is important to know the severity of CTS, which is based on NCS and clinical scales. Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a patient-perception-of-disease scale, which assesses the severity of hand symptoms and the functional impairment in both clinical and epidemiological scenarios (Levine et al., 1993). The questionnaire has shown reliability and sensitivity to change and has been validated in several languages. It has also been used as a tool for assessing the effect of different treatments on CTS. Nevertheless, factor structure (which is part of construct validity) has not been completely examined (Leite et al., 2006). Factor analysis is a statistical method that analyzes relationships among variables (i.e. questions of a questionnaire) and how these variables belong to a common underlying dimension (factor). Each dimension may be evaluated separately and its validity may be compared with some other variable (i.e. NCS).

Factor analysis is a statistical method that has been used in the study of many neuromuscular diseases. It has taken part, for example, in the assessment of internal consistency of functional scales of patients with motor neuron disease (Cedarbaum et al., 1999, Campos et al., 2010), as well as in the assessment of relevant complaints in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy and its relation with neurophysiological abnormalities (Valk et al., 1994). In CTS, factor analysis has been used to differentiate and classify symptoms (You et al., 1999).

The objective of this study was to evaluate the factor structure (different factors) underlying the BCTQ and its relation to nerve conduction studies (NCS). We hypothesize that the factor structure of BCTQ may identify those questions that are more relevant for diagnosis of CTS.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Subjects were recruited from patients referred to the Laboratory of Neurophysiology at Clínica Carlos Lleras Restrepo, Bogotá – Colombia, from March 2005 to March 2006, who were under suspicion of CTS. The study was approved by the Committee on Clinical Research, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Before NCS, all patients were interviewed with the BCTQ Spanish version. The questionnaire comprises 19 questions that assess two domains, namely functional impairment and severity

Demographic characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1

Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) was 0.91, which suggests that variables are correlated and factor analysis is appropriate for our data. Electrophysiological variables and BCTQ scores did not show a normal distribution. Factor analysis shows that the most appropriate approach is to use three factors. Less than three factors would represent a small part of the variance and more would not represent a parsimonious analysis (one of the conditions of factor analysis is that phenomena must be explained with

Discussion

This study shows that the variance of BCTQ could be represented by three separate factors that could be roughly divided into questions related to functional status (factor one), sensory symptoms (factor two) and pain (factor three). The correlation of BCTQ with NCS (criterion validity) for sensory and motor NCS is different for each domain. The evidence is that questions related to numbness and tingling (factor two) from the symptom domain had a strong and direct statistical correlation with

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (34)

  • Comparison of clinical findings and electromyography results in patients with preliminary diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

    2022, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    They also proposed that numbness, tingling, and nocturnal paresthesia are main symptoms in CTS and appear to be more closely related to peripheral nerve lesions as opposed to pain which is a symptom associated with more musculoskeletal or joint disease. They also found no statistical correlation between pain and nerve conduction studies (Ortiz-Corredor et al., 2011). de la Llave-Rincón et al. detected no significant differences in pain parameters among patients with minimal, moderate, and severe CTS.

  • Predominant patterns of median nerve displacement and deformation during individual finger motion in early carpal tunnel syndrome

    2014, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A higher SSS score suggests more serious symptoms, and a higher FSS score implies more critical functional interference (Impink et al. 2011). The BCTQ has been used in previous studies (Impink et al. 2011; Martins et al. 2008) and was chosen because of its high reproducibility, validity and sensitivity to any clinical changes (Meirelles et al. 2006; Ortiz-Corredor et al. 2011). According to the BCTQ, symptomatic individuals have scores greater than one on the SSS or FSS, or both; asymptomatic individuals have scores of one on scales.

  • Effects of varying case definition on carpal tunnel syndrome prevalence estimates in a pooled cohort

    2014, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Few studies evaluating CTS provide sufficient description of case definitions to allow for differentiation between symptoms in ≥1 and ≥2 median nerve–served digits. Most published case definitions of CTS in peer-reviewed research rely on combinations of symptoms in ≥1 of multiple areas, including the fifth digit (not normally innervated by the median sensory nerve) and the hand and wrist.51-53 Analysis of a subset of data where sites reported pain or burning independently of numbness or tingling was performed to evaluate differences in estimated prevalence when including pain or burning as a symptom criteria.

  • Assessment of Functional Outcomes

    2013, Fundamentals of Hand Therapy: Clinical Reasoning and Treatment Guidelines for Common Diagnoses of the Upper Extremity: Second Edition
  • Effectiveness of Lavendula stoechas essential oil in treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

    2018, Journal of Hand Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    All answers are rated from 1 to 5 scales, where higher scores imply more severe symptoms or greater functional impairment.20 The validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility of BCTQ have been demonstrated previously.21,22 In this study, we used a Persian version of BCTQ, which has been validated recently.23

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text