Compromised motor imagery ability in individuals with multiple sclerosis and mild physical disability: An ERP study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.04.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Motor imagery (MI) impairment has been reported in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The present study was designed to investigate neural evidence for MI impairment and its relationship to working memory in MS patients.

Methods

The study participants included 24 early stage MS patients (age: 22–40/mean = 32.7 years; M/F = 4/20; years since duration: 1–10/mean = 5.8) and 24 age-, gender-, and education-matched controls (age: 21–40/mean = 31.8 years; M/F = 5/19). Event-related potentials were recorded during a mental hand rotation task, in which participants were instructed to judge the laterality of hands displayed in different orientations. Furthermore, the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) was used for assessment of working memory.

Results

At the behavioral level, MS patients were significantly less accurate and much slower (accuracy: 83.80 ± 7.72%; reaction time: 1665.95 ± 269.82 ms) than controls (accuracy: 88.35 ± 7.68%; reaction time: 1505.16 ± 225.11 ms). At the neural level, MS patients showed a significantly reduced amplitude (MS: 0.99 ± 0.89 μv, controls: 1.46 ± 1.00 μv) and delayed peak latency (MS: 458.45 ± 67.60 ms, controls: 417.91 ± 62.47 ms) at P3 for mental rotation effect. Moreover, there were significant correlations between individuals’ PASAT scores and performance of the hand rotation task.

Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrate MI impairment in patients with MS at both the behavioral and neural level. Neuronal activity dysfunction (decreased and delayed activity) in patients with MS provides new insights into MI impairment. Furthermore, our findings suggest the contribution of working memory dysfunction to compromised MI ability in patients with MS.

Introduction

Motor imagery (MI) is a specific type of mental imagery described as mental rehearsal of a motor act without overt motor output [1]. MI has recently been considered as a therapeutic tool in patients with motor dysfunction who are trying to regain motor skills lost or impaired by neurological diseases [2], [3]. However, impairment of MI ability has also been reported in certain neurological diseases (e.g. stroke and Parkinson's disease) [4], [5] by involving motor, cognitive or somato-sensory function [6]. The lack of MI ability in stroke and slowness of MI in Parkinson disease may be explained by the location of their brain lesions.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common diseases of the central nervous system. It is characterized by demyelination and axonal degeneration, leading to interruption of neuronal connections (termed multiple disconnection syndrome) [7]. Neural disconnection can result in motor as well as cognitive dysfunction. MS is categorized into relapsing-remitting (RRMS, the most frequent subtype), secondary progressive (SPMS), and primary progressive (PPMS). Heremans et al. have recently shown compromised MI ability (lowered accuracy and dysfunction in temporal organization) in patients with MS at different stages of the disease [8]. In addition, Heremans et al. investigated patients’ imagined performance by using eye-movement registration and found temporal and spatial problem during imagined movement [9]. However, to date, no study has investigated neural processing during performance of MI by patients with MS.

Motor imagery is usually studied using Parson's hand rotation paradigm, in which participants judge the laterality of pictures held in either hand at different rotation angles [10]. In general, reaction times and error rates are amplified with increasing angles of rotation, indicating that participants engage in a mental rotation cognitive process. Behavioral studies have shown that mental rotation of the body parts appears to be constrained by the biomechanical properties of physical rotation [11].

Event-related potential (ERP) studies have shown that the mental rotation process is reflected in a modulated positive wave of about 300–700 ms, with decreasing amplitudes for increasing angles of rotation [12]. This slow decrease in amplitude is assumed to be the result of a superimposed negativity on the concurrently prevailing P300 complex, so-called rotation-related negativity (RRN). RRN is considered as an electrophysiological correlate of the mental rotation process, reflecting a stronger neural activity in the parietal cortex and is most pronounced at the P3 and P4 electrodes [13]. One study of patients with right hemiparetic cerebral palsy reported impaired MI ability, reflected in reduced amplitude and increased latency of RRN in patients [14]. Decreased amplitudes and increased latencies of late ERP components have been reported in MS patients, using different cognitive tasks [15]. Nevertheless, the question remains whether impaired MI in MS patients would be demonstrated by alteration of RRN in the mental hand rotation task.

Cognitive impairment (CI) is observed in up to 65% of patients with MS [16]. Domains most affected are attention, speed of information processing, and working memory [7]. Deficient working memory is found in the early stages of MS, when other CIs are subtle. Notably, working memory is crucial among the cognitive processes involved in MI [17], [18] and studies have shown the association between working memory and MI ability [8], [19]. Therefore, the relationship between the ERP characteristics of MS patients during the hand rotation task and their working memory function (assessed by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, PASAT) is of interest.

In summary, the present study aimed to assess RRN during the performance of MI and its relation to working memory in patients with MS. For the purposes of this study, the performance of a group of MS patients with mild disability was compared with that of a group of healthy matched controls (CTL) on a mental hand rotation task, while simultaneously measuring encephalograms (EEGs).

Section snippets

Participants

A total of 48 participants were enrolled in this study: 24 with RR-MS (mean age 32.7 years, range 20–40, M/F = 4/20, mean duration of disease 5.8 years, range 1–10) and 24 healthy participants as the CTL group (mean age 31.8 years, range 21–40, M/F = 5/19), matching the MS group in regard to age, gender, and education. All patients met the Mc Donald criteria for diagnosis of MS [20], and were assessed by the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [21]. Twenty-one (21) of the 24 patients

Results

Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Discussion

Motor imagery ability in patients with MS was recently investigated (at the behavioral level) by questionnaire, hand rotation, and mental chronometry tasks [8]. Results showed impairment of MI in both temporal organization (assessed by Box and Block) and accuracy (assessed by hand rotation task). In the present study, the neural correlates of impaired MI during the performance of the hand rotation task in patients with MS were investigated.

Our results support the existence of MI impairment in

Conclusions

In summary the current study shows MI impairment in patients with MS and with mild disability, accompanied by compromised neural processing during mental hand rotation. Apart from motor slowing (prolonged response), alteration in brain electrical activity indicates dysfunctional neural processing during MI. Our findings in regard to reduced and delayed RRN (neural correlates) in patients with MS provide a better insight into MI impairment. Moreover, MI impairment in patients with MS is affected

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funds from the Kerman Neuroscience Research Center (KNRC/90/13), Kerman, Iran. We would like to thank all individuals who took part in this study and the staff of the MS Society of Kerman.

References (42)

  • M.C. Corballis

    Mental rotation and the right hemisphere

    Brain Lang

    (1997)
  • D.J. Crammond

    Motor imagery: never in your wildest dream

    Trends Neurosci

    (1997)
  • D.L. Feltz et al.

    The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis

    J Sport Psychol

    (1983)
  • N. Sharma et al.

    Motor imagery

    Stroke

    (2006)
  • L. Simmons et al.

    Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects

    Neurorehabil Neural Repair

    (2008)
  • E. Heremans et al.

    Motor imagery ability in patients with early-and mid-stage Parkinson disease

    Neurorehabil Neural Repair

    (2011)
  • J. Liepert et al.

    Reduced Upper Limb Sensation Impairs Mental Chronometry for Motor Imagery After Stroke Clinical and Electrophysiological Findings

    Neurorehabil Neural Repair

    (2012)
  • P. Calabrese

    Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis

    J Neurol

    (2006)
  • E. Heremans et al.

    The relation between cognitive and motor dysfunction and motor imagery ability in patients with multiple sclerosis

    Mult Scler

    (2012)
  • L.M. Parsons

    Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action

    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform

    (1994)
  • F. Rösler et al.

    Patterns of cerebral activation while mental images are rotated and changed in size

    Psychophysiology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Factors and strategies affecting motor imagery ability in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

      2023, Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on the literature search, 711 records were identified from which 217 duplicates were removed (databases, n = 169; dissertation repositories, n = 12; Google Scholar, n = 36). From title/abstract screening of 201 records and full-text screening of 54 records, 14 studies were eligible for the review and critically appraised [19–32] (Fig. 1). Mean interrater agreement was 95% (95% CI 93–96%).

    • Altered sensorimotor representations after recovery from peripheral nerve damage in neuralgic amyotrophy

      2020, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      The lower extremities were not affected in the NA patients that participated in this study (van Alfen & van Engelen, 2006; van Eijk et al., 2016), ensuring that the physical button press was not influenced by peripheral factors related to the disorder, which may have been the case if finger button presses were used. As performance was only decreased for the affected limb, our findings cannot be explained by general group differences in cognitive factors such as working memory, attention or motivation, which may also affect performance on this task (Amesz, Tessari, Ottoboni, & Marsden, 2016; de Lange et al., 2004; Mazhari & Moghadas Tabrizi, 2014; Tabrizi et al., 2013). Our findings are also not explained by group differences in speed-accuracy trade-off, as evidenced by the analysis on efficiency scores.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text