Awake craniotomy versus surgery under general anesthesia for resection of intrinsic lesions of eloquent cortex—A prospective randomised study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.01.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

Complete removal of a brain tumor without inflicting neurological deficits is a desirable end result in neurosurgical practice. Currently no prospective randomized surgical series in the literature exists comparing tumor resection under general versus local anesthesia awake surgery may achieve more aggressive tumor resection and minimize postoperative neurological morbidity.

Patient and methods

We thence conducted a prospective randomized comparative study of results of surgery under awake versus surgery under general anesthesia for intrinsic eloquent area lesions. Fifty-three patients with intrinsic brain tumors in eloquent areas were prospectively randomized (26 patients in awake group and 27 for surgery under general anesthesia). At 3 months follow up, 23% patients in awake group had permanent deficits compared to 14.8% in GA group.

Results

More than 90% tumor excision was observed in 57% patients in awake group versus 73.7% in GA group.

Conclusions

The mean operative time, blood loss was found to be was found to be less in GA group patients than in awake group. Better tumor cytoreduction, neurological improvement was seen in GA group (motor improvement in 35.7%, speech improvement in 62.5%) than in awake group patients (motor improvement in 18.7%, speech improvement in 14.3%).

Introduction

By performing the resection under awake conditions, the surgeon may be able to perform a more aggressive tumor resection while minimizing the chances of postoperative neurological morbidity [1], [2], [3], [4]. Surgical resection of supratentorial gliomas and other intrinsic lesions of the brain are often limited by the location and spatial extent of the tumor and its relationship to the eloquent tissue [2], [3], [4]. Traditionally these patients are operated under general anesthesia and postoperative neurological deficits may develop in them due to retraction, edema, and/or resection of surrounding eloquent areas [5]. Primary intraaxial tumors may be safely resected if the resection remains within the confines of the lesion especially more so when the tumor is located within the functional areas assuming that the adjacent normal-appearing cortex and subcortical white matter is not disturbed. Awake craniotomy not only enables a safe corridor into the cortex but may also facilitate a wider resection of the tumor as a direct real time clinical monitoring is possible [6], [7]. Even though there have been a number of reports in the literature describing surgery under awake conditions, there are no proper prospectively randomized studies available [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Hence this study was carried out to analyze prospectively the usefulness of awake craniotomy for intrinsic lesions of brain involving the eloquent cortex in preventing development of fresh neurological deficits and in achieving greater radical resection as compared to those cases operated under general anesthesia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only such study, which has attempted to objectively define the efficacy of awake surgery for lesions situated in eloquent cortex by comparing it with similarly matched cases in the GA group.

Section snippets

Patient and methods

Fifty-three patients with intrinsic brain lesions in eloquent areas admitted for surgery between January 2001 and May 2003 were included in this prospective randomized study. Computer generated random number allocation by an independent person not involved in operating these patients was used to randomize patients into two groups viz awake and GA groups. The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of surgery under awake conditions with surgery under general anesthesia for

Results demographic profile of patients

The mean age was 42.7 years in awake group and 41.3 years in GA group. The two groups were comparable in age/sex/location of lesions on statistical analysis (Table 1).

Discussion

Despite advances in functional MRI and neuronavigation techniques that allow anatomic localization of brain function under general anesthesia, real time feedback regarding the patient's neurological status remains a distinct advantage of the awake craniotomy procedure [9], [14]. The traditional maxim that by debulking a tumor from within and thus avoids new neurological deficits may not be valid because both high and low grade gliomas have been reported to contain functional tissue [5], [15].

References (20)

  • F.B. Meyer et al.

    Awake craniotomy for aggressive resection of primary gliomas located in eloquent brain

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (2001)
  • R. Miralbell et al.

    Radiotherapy for supratentorial low grade gliomas: results and prognostic factors with special focus on tumor volume parameters

    Radiother Oncol

    (1993)
  • M.S. Berger et al.

    The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas

    Cancer

    (1994)
  • M.S. Berger et al.

    Brain mapping techniques to maximize resection, safety and seizure control in children with brain tumors

    Neurosurgery

    (1989)
  • P.M. Black et al.

    Cortical mapping for defining the limits of tumor resection

    Neurosurgery

    (1987)
  • A.R. Walsh et al.

    Cortical mapping and local anesthetic resection as an aid to surgery of low and intermediate grade gliomas

    Br J Neurosurg

    (1992)
  • S.S. Skirboll et al.

    Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within glioma

    Neurosurgery

    (1996)
  • H. Cushing

    A note upon the faradic stimulation of the precentral gyrus in conscious patients

    Brain

    (1999)
  • U. Ebeling et al.

    Safety in surgery of lesions near the motor cortex using intraoperative mapping techniques. A report on 50 patients

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (1992)
  • R.A. Danks et al.

    Patient tolerance of craniotomy performed with the patient under local anesthesia and monitored conscious sedation

    Neurosurgery

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (133)

  • Neurological outcomes following awake and asleep craniotomies with motor mapping for eloquent tumor resection

    2022, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In these cases, the two primary tools to guide resection and provide real-time intraoperative feedback are awake and asleep cortical mapping. Several studies have directly compared the postoperative rates of transient and permanent deficits after awake versus asleep mapping [6,27,29–31], but not in patient populations large enough to determine the superiority of one technique compared to the other. Our results suggest that awake and asleep motor mapping result in comparable rates of transient and long-term neurological deficits after eloquent brain tumor resection.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text