Awake craniotomy versus surgery under general anesthesia for resection of intrinsic lesions of eloquent cortex—A prospective randomised study
Introduction
By performing the resection under awake conditions, the surgeon may be able to perform a more aggressive tumor resection while minimizing the chances of postoperative neurological morbidity [1], [2], [3], [4]. Surgical resection of supratentorial gliomas and other intrinsic lesions of the brain are often limited by the location and spatial extent of the tumor and its relationship to the eloquent tissue [2], [3], [4]. Traditionally these patients are operated under general anesthesia and postoperative neurological deficits may develop in them due to retraction, edema, and/or resection of surrounding eloquent areas [5]. Primary intraaxial tumors may be safely resected if the resection remains within the confines of the lesion especially more so when the tumor is located within the functional areas assuming that the adjacent normal-appearing cortex and subcortical white matter is not disturbed. Awake craniotomy not only enables a safe corridor into the cortex but may also facilitate a wider resection of the tumor as a direct real time clinical monitoring is possible [6], [7]. Even though there have been a number of reports in the literature describing surgery under awake conditions, there are no proper prospectively randomized studies available [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Hence this study was carried out to analyze prospectively the usefulness of awake craniotomy for intrinsic lesions of brain involving the eloquent cortex in preventing development of fresh neurological deficits and in achieving greater radical resection as compared to those cases operated under general anesthesia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only such study, which has attempted to objectively define the efficacy of awake surgery for lesions situated in eloquent cortex by comparing it with similarly matched cases in the GA group.
Section snippets
Patient and methods
Fifty-three patients with intrinsic brain lesions in eloquent areas admitted for surgery between January 2001 and May 2003 were included in this prospective randomized study. Computer generated random number allocation by an independent person not involved in operating these patients was used to randomize patients into two groups viz awake and GA groups. The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of surgery under awake conditions with surgery under general anesthesia for
Results demographic profile of patients
The mean age was 42.7 years in awake group and 41.3 years in GA group. The two groups were comparable in age/sex/location of lesions on statistical analysis (Table 1).
Discussion
Despite advances in functional MRI and neuronavigation techniques that allow anatomic localization of brain function under general anesthesia, real time feedback regarding the patient's neurological status remains a distinct advantage of the awake craniotomy procedure [9], [14]. The traditional maxim that by debulking a tumor from within and thus avoids new neurological deficits may not be valid because both high and low grade gliomas have been reported to contain functional tissue [5], [15].
References (20)
- et al.
Awake craniotomy for aggressive resection of primary gliomas located in eloquent brain
Mayo Clin Proc
(2001) - et al.
Radiotherapy for supratentorial low grade gliomas: results and prognostic factors with special focus on tumor volume parameters
Radiother Oncol
(1993) - et al.
The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas
Cancer
(1994) - et al.
Brain mapping techniques to maximize resection, safety and seizure control in children with brain tumors
Neurosurgery
(1989) - et al.
Cortical mapping for defining the limits of tumor resection
Neurosurgery
(1987) - et al.
Cortical mapping and local anesthetic resection as an aid to surgery of low and intermediate grade gliomas
Br J Neurosurg
(1992) - et al.
Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within glioma
Neurosurgery
(1996) A note upon the faradic stimulation of the precentral gyrus in conscious patients
Brain
(1999)- et al.
Safety in surgery of lesions near the motor cortex using intraoperative mapping techniques. A report on 50 patients
Acta Neurochir (Wien)
(1992) - et al.
Patient tolerance of craniotomy performed with the patient under local anesthesia and monitored conscious sedation
Neurosurgery
(1998)
Cited by (133)
Corticocortical Evoked Potentials in Eloquent Brain Tumor Surgery. A Systematic Review
2024, World NeurosurgeryThe current state of the art of primary motor mapping for tumor resection: A focused survey
2023, Clinical Neurology and NeurosurgeryPassive functional mapping of receptive language cortex during general anesthesia using electrocorticography
2023, Clinical NeurophysiologyNeurological outcomes following awake and asleep craniotomies with motor mapping for eloquent tumor resection
2022, Clinical Neurology and NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :In these cases, the two primary tools to guide resection and provide real-time intraoperative feedback are awake and asleep cortical mapping. Several studies have directly compared the postoperative rates of transient and permanent deficits after awake versus asleep mapping [6,27,29–31], but not in patient populations large enough to determine the superiority of one technique compared to the other. Our results suggest that awake and asleep motor mapping result in comparable rates of transient and long-term neurological deficits after eloquent brain tumor resection.