Metabolic cost and mechanical work during walking after tibiotalar arthrodesis and the influence of footwear
Introduction
An ankle arthrodesis is a surgically achieved bony fusion of the tibiotalar joint, immobilizing the joint. Previous research has shown that immobilization of the tibiotalar joint alters the gait pattern (Wu et al., 2000, Beyaert et al., 2004). Patients adopt a walking speed that is 84% of normal walking (Waters et al., 1988) and stance time on the impaired side is reduced with 2.7% compared to the contralateral side (Beyaert et al., 2004).
Normalized for walking speed, oxygen consumption of patients with an ankle arthrodesis is suggested to increase 10% compared to healthy subjects (Waters et al., 1988). The reason for this increase has not been established until now. Recent insights predict that the increase in the energy cost of walking could be a direct consequence of impaired ankle function. Based on the double inverted pendulum model of walking, Kuo (2002) demonstrated that the energy cost of walking is for a substantial part determined by the amount of work needed for step-to-step transitions. Step-to-step transitions involve the redirection of the velocity of the bodies' center of mass (COM) between steps. At heel-strike of the leading leg the velocity of the COM is directed downward and needs to be redirected upward. The redirection of COM velocity goes at the expense of mechanical energy: at heel-strike energy is dissipated and consequently positive work is required to restore the energy loss to be able to transit to the next step (Fig. 1). Theoretically, energy loss at heel-strike is minimized when positive work is generated just before or at heel-strike through a powerful plantar flexion in the trailing limb (Donelan et al., 2002a, Donelan et al., 2002b). In patients with an immobilized tibiotalar joint powerful plantar flexion is limited and consequently positive work needs to be generated elsewhere, presumably around the hip during midstance, which is less efficient (Donelan et al., 2002a). Previous research on patients after lower limb amputation (Houdijk et al., 2009a) and total ankle arthroplasty (Doets et al., 2009) has shown that lack of plantar flexion power indeed leads to increased collision and concomitantly increased mechanical work needed for step-to-step transitions.
Apart from the timing and origin of positive work generation, the amount of work needed for step-to-step transitions is also influenced by the roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex. Adamczyk et al. (2006) found that in healthy people with an immobilized ankle (by a cast) step-to-step transition cost was mediated by the rocker shape of the foot. The metabolic energy cost of walking increased when the radius of the rocker deviated from 0.3 times leg length. A decreased range of motion (ROM) after ankle arthrodesis not only reduces power output at the ankle, but probably also deteriorates the roll-over shape of the ankle–foot complex. Restoring the roll-over shape of the ankle–foot complex in patients after tibiotalar arthrodesis, using special footwear, might therefore reduce energy loss at heel-strike despite reduced plantar flexion power at the ankle. This could result in a decreased metabolic energy cost.
The purpose of the present study was first to examine the effects of impaired ankle function due to ankle arthrodesis on metabolic energy cost of level walking. Second, to examine whether ankle arthrodesis leads to increased external mechanical work needed for step-to-step transitions as predicted by the double inverted pendulum model. Finally, to study the effect of rocker bottom shoes on external mechanical work and metabolic energy cost in patients with an ankle arthrodesis.
Section snippets
Subjects
Patients aged 18 years or above who underwent tibiotalar arthrodesis as result of primary or posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle joint were eligible for inclusion. The arthrodesis had to be healed in neutral position in the sagittal plane, 5 to 10° of external rotation (compared to the contralateral side) and 0 to 5° of valgus. Motion of the hindfoot had to be unimpaired (≥ 75% of the contralateral side). Time since surgery had to be between 1 and 6 years. For comparison, a group of healthy
Subjects characteristics
15 Patients and 18 control subjects participated in the study. Time since surgery ranged from 13 months to 5 years and 9 months (mean 41, SD 16 months). A significant reduction in ROM of 51° was found in the impaired ankle of the patients. Characteristics of patients and controls are displayed in Table 1.
Cadence and steplength
Patients had a higher cadence and smaller steplength than controls in all shoe conditions (P = 0.006, Table 2). The main effect of shoe on cadence and steplength was also significant (P < 0.001).
Metabolic energy cost
Our results show that patients after ankle arthrodesis have a 7.6% higher metabolic energy cost than healthy controls during level walking. This is in accordance with the 10% increased metabolic energy cost after ankle arthrodesis, reported by Waters et al. (1988). The increase in metabolic energy cost after ankle arthrodesis is lower compared to patients after ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Metabolic energy cost of walking was found to be 28% higher for patients after TAA compared to healthy
Conclusion
Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that metabolic energy cost of level walking is higher after ankle arthrodesis compared to normal, but this cannot be explained by the external mechanical work required for step-to-step transitions. Apparently, patients adopt a walking strategy which reduces step-to-step transitions cost but which nevertheless does not normalize metabolic energy cost. Furthermore, the roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex is unaffected after ankle
Acknowledgements
Masai Nederland BV (Nieuwegein, Netherlands) provided the MBTs used in this study.
References (27)
- et al.
The effect of tibio-talar arthrodesis on foot kinematics and ground reaction force progression during walking
Gait Posture
(2004) - et al.
Metabolic cost and mechanical work for the step-to-step transition in walking after successful total ankle arthroplasty
Hum. Mov. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking
J. Biomech.
(2002) - et al.
Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed
Clin. Biomech.
(2004) - et al.
The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking
Gait Posture
(2009) - et al.
The energy cost for balance control during upright standing
Gait Posture
(2009) The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: a dynamic walking perspective
Hum. Mov. Sci.
(2007)- et al.
Effect of an unstable shoe construction on lower extremity gait characteristics
Clin. Biomech.
(2006) - et al.
Changes in gait and EMG when walking with the Masai Barefoot Technique
Clin. Biomech.
(2006) - et al.
Measures of frontal plane stability during treadmill and overground walking
Gait Posture
(2010)
In-shoe pressure distribution in “unstable” (MBT) shoes and flat-bottomed training shoes: a comparative study
Gait Posture
Ankle fixation need not increase the energetic cost of human walking
Gait Posture
Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis
Gait Posture
Cited by (32)
Ankle-Foot Orthoses and Rocker Bottom Shoes
2022, Foot and Ankle BiomechanicsPreclinical biomechanical testing models for the tibiotalar joint and its replacements: A systematic review
2020, Foot and Ankle SurgeryThe effect of Masai Barefoot Technology (MBT) footwear on lower limb biomechanics: A systematic review
2016, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :Stoggl et al. (2010)b – post 10 weeks intervention. One study [9] investigated the effects of MBT footwear in participants who had undergone tibiotalar arthrodesis. Results showed a statistically significant increase in cadence (SMD = 1.02 steps/min, 95% CI = 0.29 steps/min to 1.75 steps/min, large effect) and a decrease in step length (SMD = −0.85 cm, 95% CI = −1.57 cm to −0.13 cm, large effect) in those wearing the MBT footwear (Fig. 2).
Does Modified Footwear Improve Gait After Ankle Arthrodesis?
2016, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
- 1
Authors contributed equally.