Elsevier

Clinical Biomechanics

Volume 19, Issue 8, October 2004, Pages 868-871
Clinical Biomechanics

Brief report
Lateral ankle sprain: isokinetic test reliability and comparison between invertors and evertors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. Evaluate reliability of isokinetic tests for inversion and eversion in individuals with recurrent lateral ankle sprain and compare inversion to eversion muscle performance in the same ankles.

Design. Reliability was evaluated by comparing the results of two ankle inversion/eversion isokinetic tests. Inversion and eversion were compared with the results presented by the tests.

Background. Previous studies showed reliable isokinetic tests for ankles with no sprain history. It is unknown if such tests can also be performed in lateral sprained ankles. It is unclear whether there is difference between invertors and evertors in these ankles.

Methods. Eleven men with recurrent ankle lateral sprain in one limb were tested using an isokinetic dynamometer. The tests consisted of 5 cycles of maximal contraction in 30°/s and 120°/s. Both injured and noninjured ankles were tested. Peak torque was recorded for analysis.

Results. The tests are reliable and intraclass coefficient correlation varied from 0.71 to 0.95. Invertors generated higher peak torques than evertors (P=0.03) when injured ankles were tested at 120°/s.

Conclusions. Isokinetic inversion/eversion tests showed to be reliable. A decrease in peak torques can be seen during higher velocity tests. The only difference between invertors and evertors was seen when injured ankles were tested at 120°/s. In this case invertors showed higher peak torques.
Relevance

Inversion and eversion isokinetic tests can be used to evaluate strength properties in population with recurrent lateral ankle sprain and detect specific muscle performance deficits. Therefore specific treatment can be provided for those individuals.

Introduction

There are many diseases related to the ankle and they vary from congenital disorders to traumas. The traumas are frequently caused by work, car, and sports related accidents.

One of the most common injuries associated with physical activity is the inversion sprain of the ankle (Birmingham et al., 1997), and despite its high occurrence, it is difficult to find reliable muscle measurement procedures within lateral ankle sprain rehabilitation practices (Eggart et al., 1993).

The highest incidence of lateral ankle sprain occurs in plantar flexion, internal rotation and inversion (Garrick, 1977).

Many evaluations used by health professionals in clinics and hospitals, are often considered inefficient, at times because it is difficult to reproduce the tests, other times because of the low level of specificity achieved by the tests (Eggart et al., 1993).

Researchers such as Leslie et al. (1990), Wong et al. (1984), Simoneau (1990) and others have standardized procedures for isokinetic evaluation of the ankle, through acquisition of muscular peak torque produced in isokinetic movement of ankle inversion and eversion. So far, no studies have presented results of reliability tests with the same protocols conducted in individuals with recurrent lateral ankle sprain. It can be a mistake to assume that reliable tests for healthy subjects will be just as reliable when testing pathologic conditions. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of the isokinetic test for ankle inversion and eversion in individuals with recurrent lateral ankle sprain and to compare inversion peak torque to eversion peak torque in all ankles, injured and noninjured.

Section snippets

Subjects

The tests were administered to 11 volunteer men between the ages of 18 and 25. The subjects presented recurrent lateral ankle sprain in only one foot. The last episode of sprain had happened at least 4 months prior to the tests and at the most 12 months prior to the tests. To be eligible for the study the injury had to have caused cessation of sporting activities for at least 2 months. Lateral ankle sprain is defined as a sudden inversion injury resulting in pain, swelling and abnormal gait (

Results

All ICC values for peak torque in inversion and eversion movements for injured and noninjured ankles can be seen in Table 1 and the comparison between invertors and evertors for each ankle is shown in Table 2.

The ICC for inversion and eversion tests in injured ankles varied from 0.71 to 0.92 while the noninjured ankles developed a variation between 0.90 and 0.95. The values found in this study show that the procedures adopted for the tests are reliable.

When invertors were compared to evertors,

Discussion

Comparing previous reliability studies (Karnofel et al., 1989; Leslie et al., 1990; Simoneau, 1984) to the latter, it seems that all found similar reliability levels. The values for ICC found in this present study varied from 0.71 to 0.95, showing that ankle inversion and eversion tests, even in subjects with ankle sprain history, are reliable.

It is important to emphasize that, differently from the previous studies (Karnofel et al., 1989; Leslie et al., 1990; Simoneau, 1984); in this study all

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the isokinetic tests for ankle inversion and eversion, following the procedures used in this study were reliable. The tests showed high reliability for noninjured ankles as well as for injured ankles.

At a higher velocity such as 120°/s, there will be a decrease in the values for peak torque during ankle inversion and eversion.

There was no statistical difference between invertors and evertors, except for the test performed at 120°/s in injured ankles. At this velocity,

References (12)

  • T.B. Birmingham et al.

    Peak passive resistive torque at maximum inversion range of motion in subjects with recurrent ankle sprains

    Journal of Orthopaedics Sports Physical Therapy

    (1997)
  • M. Cawthorn et al.

    Isokinetic measurement of foot invertor and evertor force in three positions of plantarflexion and dorsiflexion

    Journal of Orthopaedics Sports Physical Therapy

    (1991)
  • J.S. Eggart et al.

    Exame fı́sico pré-competição do atlela

  • J.G. Garrick

    The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains

    American Journal of Sports Medicine

    (1977)
  • M.T. Gross

    Effects of recurrent lateral ankle sprains on active and passive judgments of joint position

    Physical Therapy

    (1987)
  • T.W. Kaminski et al.

    Effect of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion strength ratios in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability

    British Journal of Sports Medicine

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (52)

  • The association between the isokinetic muscle strength and lower extremity injuries in young male football players

    2019, Physical Therapy in Sport
    Citation Excerpt :

    The knee was extended while testing the plantar flexion and dorsiflexion and in 30–40°/sec flexion while testing the inversion and eversion. The rationale for choosing these speeds was based on previous studies in which comparable speeds were used (De Noronha & Júnior, 2004; Fagher et al., 2016). An injury is defined as any physical complaint sustained by a player that results from a football match or football training, irrespective of the need for medical attention or time loss from football activities.

  • Assessment of evertor weakness in patients with chronic ankle instability: Functional versus isokinetic testing

    2017, Clinical Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    While isokinetic eccentric muscular weakness has been considered as a factor responsible for CAI by some authors (Abdel-Aziem and Draz, 2014; David et al., 2013; Hartsell and Spaulding, 1999; Willems et al., 2002; Yildiz et al., 2003; Tropp, 1986), it is worth noting that there is no clear consensus about the relationships between evertor isokinetic weakness and CAI (Bernier et al., 1997; Kaminski et al., 1999; Kwon et al., 2013; Lentell et al., 1990). In addition, such a deficit has rarely been evaluated in clinical practice (Eggart et al., 1993; De Nohonha and Borges, 2004; Plante and Wikstrom, 2013). Hence, isokinetic evaluation is still considered the gold standard procedure for research purposes, whereas this methodology is not easily transferable to daily practice due to cost, space requirements, portability and time consuming constraints considered as barriers by clinicians.

  • Impaired control of weight bearing ankle inversion in subjects with chronic ankle instability

    2014, Clinical Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies dealing with ankle evertor strength evaluation are classically based on isokinetic tests. Following a standardized procedure proposed 20 years ago (Leslie et al., 1990; Simoneau, 1990), it has been demonstrated that ankle eversion peak torque produced in isokinetic movement gives a reliable measurement of evertor strength for healthy (Aydog et al., 2004) and CAI subjects (De Nohonha and Borges, 2004; Sekir et al., 2008). However, such assessment procedures are not widely used by rehabilitation specialists because the equipment is expensive and the evaluation procedure preparation is time consuming.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text