Domestic violence as child maltreatment: Differential risks and outcomes among cases referred to child welfare agencies for domestic violence exposure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.12.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Assessed risk in CPS cases referred for domestic violence is related to whether DV is the sole allegation or concurrent with other allegations.

  • Cases referred for DV have significantly higher rates of substantiation than cases referred for other maltreatment types.

  • Higher rates of substantiation for DV-referred cases do not translate to higher rates of service provision or out-of-home placement.

Abstract

As awareness has grown regarding the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child maltreatment and the potential deleterious outcomes associated with children's exposure to domestic violence, some public child welfare agencies are expanding their reach to include domestic violence as a form of maltreatment warranting protective intervention. Using nationally representative survey data, this study examines differential characteristics, risks, and outcomes of cases referred to child welfare agencies for domestic violence compared to cases referred for other allegations. Results indicate that child welfare cases alleging domestic violence as a maltreatment allegation have unique profiles of risk, demographics, and outcomes that distinguish them from cases alleging other maltreatment types. In the aggregate, cases reported for domestic violence have higher likelihood of substantiation than other cases, but are no more likely to receive child welfare services, and are less likely to result in out-of-home placement. These findings suggest that for many cases that come to the attention of child welfare agencies due to child domestic violence exposure, substantiated findings of maltreatment do not result in more intensive CPS interventions. Findings from this study suggest that some lower-risk cases reported to child welfare agencies for domestic violence exposure could be appropriately targeted for alternative, non-investigative service approaches.

Section snippets

Introduction: child welfare and domestic violence

Recent decades have seen a shift in the child welfare system's response to domestic violence. Child maltreatment and domestic violence have long been widely acknowledged as social problems, but they were historically regarded as distinct problems with different causes, service systems, and policy contexts (Banks, Hazen, Coben, Wang, & Griffith, 2009; Fleck-Henderson, 2000: Henry, 2017; Kaufman Kantor & Little, 2003; Magen, 1999; Moles, 2008; Schechter & Edleson, 1994; Shlonsky, Friend, &

Data source

This study is a secondary analysis of the Second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II), a federally-funded longitudinal multi-informant survey designed to provide comprehensive information on a nationally representative sample of children investigated by U.S. child welfare (CPS) agencies (Dolan, Smith, Casanueva, & Ringeisen, 2011). The NSCAW II includes 5872 children (age birth to 17 at sampling) who were subjects of child welfare investigations or assessments

Results

Weighted and unweighted frequency distributions of all variables are reported in Table 1. The weighted distributions reflect the estimated frequencies in the child welfare population after applying survey weights to adjust for the oversampling patterns in the raw study sample.

The large majority of children in the sample (N = 5055) fell into the third allegation group, reflecting allegations that did not include DV. The distribution of the independent variable is fairly consistent between the

Discussion

Findings from this study suggest that child protection cases alleging domestic violence as a maltreatment allegation, either alone or concurrently with other allegations, have distinct demographic and risk characteristics compared to cases with maltreatment allegations that do not include domestic violence. Further, the presence of DV as a maltreatment allegation is a significant independent predictor of front-end child welfare case decisions.

The three categories of maltreatment allegations

Declarations of interest

None.

Funding

This work was generously supported by a dissertation grant from Soroptimist International.

Acknowledgements

The author extends deep thanks to Jill Duerr Berrick, Jeffrey Edleson, and Jane Mauldon for their guidance and feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

References (98)

  • S. Hamby et al.

    The overlap of witnessing partner violence with chid maltreatment and other victimizations in a nationally representative survey of youth

    Child Abuse & Neglelct

    (2010)
  • C.C. Hartley

    Severe domestic violence and maltreatment: Considering child physical abuse, neglect, and failure to protect

    Children and Youth Services Review

    (2004)
  • A.L. Hazen et al.

    Intimate partner violence among female caregivers of children reported for child maltreatment

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2004)
  • S. Holt et al.

    The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2008)
  • A. Holtzworth-Munroe et al.

    A brief review of the research on husband violence

    Aggression and Violent Behavior

    (1997)
  • S.M. Horwitz et al.

    Predictors of placement for children who initially remained in their homes after an investigation for abuse or neglect

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2011)
  • J.M. Hussey et al.

    Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: Distinction without a difference

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2005)
  • L.G. Mills et al.

    Child protection and domestic violence: Training, practice, and policy issues

    Children and Youth Services Review

    (2000)
  • K. Moles

    Bridging the divide between child welfare and domestic violence services: Deconstructing the change process

    Children and Youth Services Review

    (2008)
  • K.L. Nixon et al.

    Do good intentions beget good policy? A review of child protection policies to address intimate partner violence

    Children and Youth Services Review

    (2007)
  • E. Putnam-Hornstein et al.

    Racial and ethnic disparities: A population-based examination of risk factors for involvement with child protective services

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2013)
  • J.A. Schumacher et al.

    Risk factors for male-to-female partner physical abuse

    Aggression and Violent Behavior

    (2001)
  • B.G. Victor et al.

    Domestic violence, parental substance misuse, and the decision to substantiate child maltreatment

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2018)
  • R. Alaggia et al.

    Does differential response make a difference: Examining domestic violence cases in child protection services

    Child and Family Social Work

    (2013)
  • R. Alaggia et al.

    In whose best interest? A Canadian case study of the impact of child welfare policies in cases of domestic violence

    Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention

    (2007)
  • A.E. Appel et al.

    The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: A review and appraisal

    Journal of Family Psychology

    (1998)
  • G.E. Barboa et al.

    Longitudinal growth of post-traumatic stress and depressive symptoms following a child maltreatment allegation: An examination of violence exposure, family risk and placement type

    Children and Youth Services Review

    (2017)
  • S.K. Beeman et al.

    Case assessment and service receipt in families experiencing both child maltreatment and woman battering

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (2001)
  • M.L. Benson et al.

    The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context

    Social Problems

    (2004)
  • H.L. Bragg

    Child protection in families experiencing domestic violence

    (2003)
  • B.E. Carlson

    Children exposed to intimate partner violence: Research findings and implications for intervention

    Trauma, Violence, and Abuse

    (2000)
  • M.M. Cavanaugh et al.

    The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy, and practice

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (2005)
  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. ([CWIG])

    State statutes search

    (2016)
  • C. Coohey

    What criteria do child protective services investigators use to substantiate exposure to domestic violence?

    Child Welfare

    (2007)
  • H.C. Covey et al.

    Effects of adolescent physical abuse, exposure to neighborhood violence, and witnessing parental violence on adult socioeconomic status

    Child Maltreatment

    (2013)
  • P.A. Cowan et al.

    Normative family transitions and processes, and healthy child development

  • T.P. Cross et al.

    Caseworker judgments and substantiation

    Child Maltreatment

    (2009)
  • L.E. Daigle

    Empowering women to protect: Improving intervention with victims of domestic violence in cases of child abuse and neglect; a study of Travis County, Texas

    Texas Journal of Women and the Law

    (1998)
  • M. Dolan et al.

    NSCAW II baseline report: Introduction to NSCAW II. OPRE Report #2011-27a

    (2011)
  • K. Dowd et al.

    national survey of child and adolescent well-being II: Wave 1 data file user's manual, restricted release version

    (2010)
  • B. Drake

    Unraveling “unsubstantiated”

    Child Maltreatment

    (1996)
  • B. Drake et al.

    Substantiation and recidivism

    Child Maltreatment

    (2003)
  • J. Edleson

    Children's witnessing of adult domestic violence

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (1999)
  • J.L. Edleson

    Should child exposure to domestic violence be defined as child maltreatment under the law?

  • J.L. Edleson et al.

    Assessing child exposure to adult domestic violence

    Children and Youth Services Review

    (2007)
  • C.G. Ellison et al.

    Race/ethnicity, religious involvement, and domestic violence

    Violence Against Women

    (2007)
  • J.W. Fantuzzo et al.

    Effects of interparental violence on the psychological adjustment and competencies of young children

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1991)
  • J.W. Fantuzzo et al.

    Prevalence and effects of child exposure to domestic violence

    The Future of Children

    (1999)
  • D. Finkelhor et al.

    Violence, abuse, and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth

    Pediatrics

    (2009)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Mothers abused by intimate partners: Comparisons of those with children placed by child protective services and those without

      2020, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the national study of Canadian substantiated CPS cases in 2008, the most common characteristic of the primary caregiver was being a victim of domestic violence (42%) (Trocmé, Fallon, MacLauren, Sinha, & Black, 2010). One critical difference between cases involving CEDV compared to the non-CEDV referrals is higher substantiation of child abuse rates (Lawson, 2019). As many cases are referred by mandated reporters such as law enforcement officers who respond to IPV calls and VAW shelter workers, the child maltreatment is often substantiated simply because the domestic violence was reported (Alaggia, Gadalla, Shlonsky, Jenney, & Daciuk, 2015).

    • Domestic homicides within LGBTQ2S+ communities: barriers in disclosing relationships and violence

      2020, Preventing Domestic Homicides: Lessons Learned from Tragedies
    • Children's exposure to domestic violence: Theory, practice, and implications for policy

      2023, Children's Exposure to Domestic Violence: Theory, Practice, and Implications for Policy
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    NDACAN Acknowledgement: This document includes data from the National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being, which was developed under contract with the Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (ACYF/DHHS). The data have been provided by the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect. The information and opinions expressed herein reflect solely the position of the author. Nothing herein should be construed to indicate the support or endorsement of its content by ACYF/DHHS.

    View full text