Elsevier

Children and Youth Services Review

Volume 46, November 2014, Pages 220-229
Children and Youth Services Review

Hierarchies of child maltreatment types at different perceived severity levels in European Americans, Korean Americans, and Koreans

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cultural definitions of severe, moderate, and mild levels of child abuse were coded.

  • Prototypical types of abuse varied at each severity level within and between ethnicities.

  • European Americans consistently placed greater emphasis on physical aggression.

  • Koreans focused more on psychological aggression even when defining extreme abuse.

  • Korean American responses were more like those of European Americans than Koreans.

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to compare differences within and between ethnic groups in their perspectives on what constituted child maltreatment and how severe (extreme, moderate, or mild) they perceived different types of maltreatment to be. A sample of 150 European American, Korean American, and Korean college students completed a survey asking them to give examples of parental behaviors that would be considered by people in their culture to be extreme, moderate, and mild forms of child abuse. The responses were coded for maltreatment types (e.g., physical, psychological, neglect) and subtypes (e.g., hitting). The frequency with which different types of maltreatment were considered abusive varied within ethnicity based on designated level of severity. These findings suggest that arbitrarily categorizing a child’s maltreatment experience into a rigid, pre-determined hierarchy of maltreatment types without considering the severity of different forms of maltreatment can result in overlooking valuable information. Moreover, fewer European Americans than Koreans identified psychological aggression as an extremely abusive type of abuse as well as in their total examples of abuse. European Americans placed greater emphasis on physical aggression, whereas Koreans focused more on psychological aggression and neglect. In perceptions of abuse, Korean Americans were more similar to European Americans than to Koreans. We recommend that when evaluating level of child abuse, investigators and researchers should take into account the different levels of severity within each type of maltreatment and the behaviors that are considered normative within different cultures.

Introduction

Making comparisons of child abuse across cultures and even across studies has been difficult because of the imprecision of definitions of abuse. The National Research Council (1993), pointing out the absence of clear operational definitions of child abuse, recommended quantifying relevant maltreatment dimensions, especially severity, rather than focusing on the simple presence or absence of maltreatment (Herrenkohl, 2005, Litrownik et al., 2005, Runyan et al., 2005). However, difficulties in defining maltreatment types and judging the severity of different forms of abuse continue to plague researchers, practitioners, and policy makers in this field (Arruabarrena and De Paúl, 2012, Herrenkohl and Herrenkohl, 2009, Litrownik et al., 2005, Sprang et al., 2005).

Some attention (e.g., Raman & Hodge, 2012) has been given to the possibility that views concerning the severity of different types of maltreatment differ across cultures. However, there is a dearth of actual cross-cultural studies focusing on ethnic differences in perspectives on child maltreatment (Elliott and Urquiza, 2006, Fakunmoju et al., 2013, Miller and Cross, 2006). In particular, there is a need for more qualitative research on ethnic minorities that can describe culturally-divergent ethnic groups and capture the complexity of cultural constructs (Ponterotto, 2002). This is important because particular cultural constructs and behaviors may be unique to the particular sociocultural contexts within which development occurs (Ponterotto, 2005). Surprisingly, to our knowledge, there have been no empirical studies examining different definitions or conceptions of child maltreatment types within and across cultures based on a bottom-up approach. To address this gap in the literature, we administered an open-ended survey asking participants to give examples of parental behaviors that would be considered by people in their culture to be extreme, moderate, and mild forms of child abuse. After coding these specific examples, we examined the hierarchy of maltreatment types perceived as abusive at different severity levels (i.e., extreme, moderate, and mild) within and between ethnic cultural groups (i.e., European American, Korean American, and Korean).

Section snippets

Hierarchies in severity of maltreatment types within ethnicities

A number of researchers have tried to construct hierarchical classification systems identifying the predominant types of maltreatment that best predict children’s developmental outcomes following multiple maltreatment experiences. Based on the presumed seriousness of different types of maltreatment, their status in an active-passive dimension (in which neglect and emotional abuse are often seen as more passive and sexual and physical abuse as more active), and violation of social norms,

Hierarchies in severity of maltreatment types between the U.S. and Korea

Also of interest in the current study was the possibility of cultural differences among European Americans, Korean Americans, and Koreans in hierarchies of perceived severity of maltreatment. Given cultural differences in child rearing norms, it is likely that what is considered appropriate discipline and what is considered maltreatment may vary across cultures and thereby influence views regarding the outcomes (more or less severe) and different motives for particular parental behaviors.

Sample

Sixty-two European American and 26 Korean American undergraduate students at a large urban university in the northeastern United States and 62 Korean students at Yonsei University in Korea constituted the sample for this analysis; all students received credit toward a requirement in their psychology courses. The Korean American sample consisted of participants who were born in the U.S. to parents who had been born in Korea. The demographic characteristics of each subsample are presented in

Results

First, to examine within and between group differences in the types of abuse given at each level by ethnicity, we conducted a mixed 3 (ethnicity) x 5 (type of aggression) ANOVA at each level of presumed severity. Regarding the main effect of the between subjects factor (ethnicity), there was no significant main effect for ethnicity in number of examples of specific types of maltreatment given at each level of abuse severity (i.e., extreme, moderate, and mild). The main effect for types of

Hierarchies in severity of maltreatment types within ethnicities

First, we examined whether one particular type of maltreatment is viewed as the prototypical form of abuse regardless of designated level of severity, and whether prototypical concepts of abuse vary at the presumed severity of particular forms of maltreatment. Results showed that examples of physical aggression were not always the most commonly listed abusive behaviors at all severity levels in each ethnic group. The dominant types that were mentioned varied based on the specified level of

References (64)

  • A.S. Lau et al.

    What's in a name? A comparison of methods for classifying predominant type of maltreatment

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2005)
  • Y. Lee et al.

    Childhood maltreatment in South Korea: Retrospective study

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2011)
  • A.J. Litrownik et al.

    Measuring the severity of child maltreatment

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2005)
  • D.K. Runyan et al.

    Describing maltreatment: Do child protective service reports and research definitions agree?

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2005)
  • G. Sprang et al.

    Factors that contribute to child maltreatment severity: a multi-method and multidimensional investigation

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2005)
  • M.A. Straus et al.

    Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactic scales development and psychometric for a national sample of American parents

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1998)
  • D. Baumrind

    The discipline controversy revisited

    Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies

    (1996)
  • A. Bell et al.

    IBM SPSS Statistics (18 & 19) Workbook

    (2011)
  • M.B. Brewer et al.

    Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism

    Psychological Review

    (2007)
  • Child Maltreatment. (n.d.). (Retrieved from)...
  • Children’s Bureau

    Child maltreatment 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families)

    (2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008)
  • V.I. Chirkova et al.

    Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit

    International Journal of Intercultural Relations

    (2005)
  • E.M. Douglas

    Familial violence socialization in childhood and later life approval of corporal punishment: A Cross-cultural perspective

    American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

    (2006)
  • M. Dwairy

    Introduction to special section on cross-cultural research on parenting and psychological adjustment in children

    Journal of Child and Family Studies

    (2010)
  • K. Elliott et al.

    Ethnicity, culture, and child maltreatment

    Journal of Social Issues

    (2006)
  • D.J. English

    Modified Maltreatment Classification System (MMCS)

  • A. Field

    Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics

    (2013)
  • H.W. Gardiner et al.

    Culture and issues of sex and gender (Ch. 7)

  • R. Garg et al.

    Parenting style and academic achievement for East Indian and Canadian adolescents

    Journal of Comparative Family Studies

    (2005)
  • E.T. Gershoff

    Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2002)
  • E.T. Gershoff et al.

    Parent discipline practices in an international sample: Associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness

    Child Development

    (2010)
  • H.C. Hahm et al.

    The emerging problems of physical child abuse in South Korea

    Child Maltreatment

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text