A longitudinal examination of predictors of delinquency: An analysis of data from the Mobile Youth Survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationships among adolescent delinquency, self-worth, peer influence, and family cohesion (i.e., maternal and paternal warmth). The longitudinal analysis identified how these relationships develop and change through adolescence. Using data from the Mobile Youth Survey, a 14-year longitudinal study of high-poverty, primarily Black American youths living in Alabama (N = 5400), delinquency, self-worth, and peer influence were analyzed in linear growth models. Results from these three linear growth models are presented. Findings include a significant increase in delinquency over time for the adolescents in the study and significantly lower rates of delinquency overall for females than males. Delinquency was also found to have negative relationships to both parental warmth and self-worth, with higher levels leading to decreased delinquency. Peer influence was found to have a gender effect, with males exhibiting steady rates, while females exhibit an increase in peer influence over time. Furthermore, maternal warmth and self-worth are also found to increase the rates of peer influence as well as significantly increasing self-worth.

Highlights

► Examined the relationships among delinquency, self-worth, peers, and family cohesion. ► Modeled three linear growth models with the outcome of delinquency. ► Results indicate a significant increase in delinquency over time.

Introduction

Despite decades of research and intervention, juvenile delinquency remains a social problem in modern American culture. Studies have shown that deviant behavior in adolescence leads to an increased likelihood of adult criminal behavior (Haynie, 2001, Patterson et al., 1989). The literature abounds with empirical support for several causal factors. Although early research was often limited by its cross-sectional nature and attention to few variables, more recent research has been more complex, with studies based on longitudinal data and examining variables such as gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Still, such research is in its relative infancy and additional research is needed to increase knowledge regarding the various pathways through which certain juveniles become classified as delinquent.

Although relatively little research has investigated predictors of delinquency among youths living in extreme poverty, some factors, such as inconsistent or low levels of parental monitoring and association with deviant peers have emerged as promising for further investigation for these youths as well as youths living in other situations (Brody et al., 2006; Hoeve et al., 2009, Murphy et al., 2012, O'Donnell et al., 2012, Simons and Burt, 2011). In contrast, the literature on the causes and consequences of delinquent behavior among Black American adolescents is extensive. For example, peer relationships (O'Donnell et al., 2012), family structure and relationships (Farrington, Jolliffe, Loeber, Stouthamer-Loeber, & Kalb, 2001), and self-image (McMahon & Watts, 2002) have been cited as factors associated with deviant behavior in Black American adolescents, although few models have been developed to explore the strength of these associations.

It is likely that age, gender, and ethnicity influence how various factors, both independently and interactively, influence delinquent behaviors among adolescents (Daigle et al., 2007, Ge et al., 2002, O'Donnell et al., 2012, Whaley et al., 2010). Association with delinquent peers, for example, has been found to be a better predictor of delinquency for males than for females (Piquero, Gover, MacDonald, & Piquero, 2005). Across gender and ethnicity, the effects of relationships with parents and problem behaviors have been shown to be partially mediated by school success and time spent with friends (Pilgrim, Schulenberg, O'Malley, Bachman, & Johnston, 2006). In addition, gender differences in rates of juvenile delinquency and in factors that predict juvenile delinquency have been reported (Fagan and Wright, 2012, Jennings et al., 2009, Neumann et al., 2010, Snyder et al., 2008).

In this study, we use longitudinal data from the Mobile Youth Survey (Bolland, 2004) to explore the effects of self-worth, peer influence, and family cohesion on delinquency in a sample of black adolescent males and females living in extreme poverty. By focusing on strengths of associations rather than just existence of associations, the study fills a gap in the literature.

Studies of delinquency often have been framed in one or more of three criminological theories: differential association/social learning; social control/social bonding, and general strain (Cullen, Wright, & Blevins, 2006; Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 2007). Research that is framed within a particular theory, however, focuses on the variables important to that theory; such research may, therefore, fail to examine the influence of other variables important to the phenomena of interest (Daigle et al., 2007). We have avoided this limitation by selecting variables that have been demonstrated to be important, rather than by attempting to test one or more theories. We call upon these theories; however, to explain the findings, building a framework that links individual choice and environmental influence.

Section snippets

Literature review

There is a consensus that deviant behavior in adolescence leads to an increased likelihood of adult criminal behavior (Haynie, 2001, Patterson et al., 1989). There are fewer consensuses; however, regarding causal links to adolescent negative behavior. Although the nature of a youth's peer relationships (Clark, 2007, Haynie and Osgood, 2005), social and family environments and relationships (Church, Wharton, & Taylor, 2009), and self-image (Donnellan et al., 2005, Giordano, 2003, Ostrowsky, 2010

Sample

The Mobile Youth Survey (MYS) is a 14 year longitudinal study of adolescents living in low-income neighborhoods in the Alabama port city of Mobile, as well the neighboring town of Prichard (Bolland, 2004). The current analysis includes data from 5400 adolescents.

The MYS data were collected annually between 1998 and 2011 from a total of 10,694 youths aged 9–19. In the current study, participants were included if they had at least two data points. Additionally, data points at ages 9, 10, and 19

Model 1: delinquency

A linear growth model was estimated with delinquency of the individual as the dependent variable, peer influence on delinquency, self-worth, warmth toward the mother, and warmth toward the father as time-varying covariates, and gender as a time-invariant covariate. Non-significant terms were removed from the final model. Estimates for the unconditional growth model and the final conditional model are shown in Table 1.

The unconditional growth model demonstrates a significant increase in

Discussion

In this study, we investigated several factors that have been shown to be associated with adolescent delinquency. Using 13 waves of data from over 5000 adolescents aged 11–18; we estimated growth models for three outcomes: delinquency, peer influence on delinquency, and self-worth. Family cohesion (i.e., maternal and paternal warmth) and gender were covariates in each model. Overall, results from this study are consistent with previous research findings that among adolescents who exhibit

Limitations and strengths

Several limitations of the study must be considered. First, while the current study set out to analyze relationships proposed by Church et al. (2009) in a longitudinal data set, the sample size was too small and the number of parameters was too large to estimate a full longitudinal structural model. As an alternative, each of the endogenous variables was analyzed in a separate linear growth model. This limits our results to the direct effects of the variables, as opposed to capturing all the

References (65)

  • M.R. Beg et al.

    A typology of behavior problems in preschool children

    Assessment

    (2007)
  • J.M. Bolland

    Overview of the Mobile Youth Study

    (2004)
  • G.H. Brody et al.

    Perceived discrimination and the adjustment of African American youths: A five-year longitudinal analysis with contextual moderation effects

    Child Development

    (2006)
  • D. Cantillion

    Community social organization, parents and peers as mediators of perceived neighborhood block characteristics on delinquent and prosocial activities

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (2006)
  • W.T. Church et al.

    An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency

    Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

    (2009)
  • C. Cooper et al.

    Family structure transitions and maternal parenting stress

    Journal of Marriage and Family

    (2009)
  • F.T. Cullen et al.

    Introduction: Taking stock of criminological theory

  • L.E. Daigle et al.

    Generality-specificity debate gender differences in the predictors of juvenile delinquency: Assessing the generality-specificity debate

    Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

    (2007)
  • S. Demuth et al.

    Family structure, family process, and adolescent delinquency: The significance of parental absence versus parental gender

    Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency

    (2004)
  • A.R. Deutsch et al.

    Parent and peer pathways to adolescent delinquency: Variations by ethnicity and neighborhood context

    Journal of Youth and Adolescents

    (2012)
  • M.B. Donnellan et al.

    Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency

    Psychological Science

    (2005)
  • A.A. Fagan et al.

    The effects of neighborhood context on youth violence and delinquency: Does gender matter?

    Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

    (2012)
  • S.S. Feldman et al.

    Changing perceptions of family cohesion and power across adolescence

    Child Development

    (1988)
  • X. Ge et al.

    Contextual amplification of pubertal transition effects on deviant peer affiliation and externalizing behavior among African American children

    Developmental Psychology

    (2002)
  • P.C. Giordano

    Relationships in adolescence

    Annual Review of Sociology

    (2003)
  • D. Gorman-Smith et al.

    A developmental–ecological model of the relation of family functioning to patterns of delinquency

    Journal of Quantitative Criminology

    (2000)
  • M.R. Gottfredson et al.

    A general theory of crime

  • W.R. Gove et al.

    The family and juvenile delinquency

    The Sociological Quarterly

    (1982, summer)
  • K.W. Griffin et al.

    Parenting practices as predictors of substance abuse, delinquency, and aggression among urban minority youth: Moderating effects of family structure and gender

    Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

    (2000)
  • S. Harter

    The perceived competence scale for children

    Child Development

    (1982)
  • S. Harter et al.

    Beyond the debate: Why some adolescents report stable self-worth over time and situation, whereas others report changes in self-worth

    Journal of Personality

    (2003)
  • D.L. Haynie

    Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?

    The American Journal of Sociology

    (2001)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Neutralization technique use predicts delinquency and substance use outcomes

      2019, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      This study builds upon prior research in that the study variables are applied to non-incarcerated adolescents. Delinquent behavior is often researched in adolescents who have been arrested for their delinquent behavior (Church et al., 2012) and this study examines the same constructs in an in-school adolescent population. Furthermore, while substance use and delinquency have been examined together (Fergusson, Horwood, & Ridder, 2007) and neutralization techniques were theorized in relationship with delinquent behavior (Sykes & Matza, 1957), the three variables have not often been studied as separate constructs.

    • Maternal support and deviance among rural adolescents: The mediating role of self-esteem

      2018, Journal of Adolescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      No previous work has tested self-esteem as a potential mediator between maternal support and adolescent deviance. Sex differences in adolescent self-esteem (e.g., Bachman, O'Malley, Freedman-Doan, Trzesniewski, & Donnellan, 2011; Bleidorn et al., 2015; Diseth, Meland, & Breidablik, 2014) and deviance (e.g., Church et al., 2012; Fair Worthen, 2012; Koon-Magnin, Bowers, Langhinrichsen-Rohling, & Arata, 2016) are well known. However, much less is known about sex differences in how parents influence adolescents' self-esteem and deviance.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: + 1 205 348 5736.

    2

    Tel.: + 1 205 348 3926.

    3

    Tel.: + 1 205 348 5611.

    4

    Tel.: + 1 270 293 8594.

    5

    Tel.: + 1 205 348 9953.

    View full text