Theoretical adherence to family centered practice: Are strengths-based principles illustrated in families' descriptions of child welfare services?
Research Highlights
► Descriptions of services were analyzed for adherence to Family Centered Practice principles. ► Families' descriptions of services inconsistently demonstrated FCP. ► Findings indicated more attention is needed regarding theoretical adherence to FCP principles.
Introduction
Since its introduction (Weick et al., 1989, Saleebey, 1992), the strengths perspective has refocused social work's preoccupation with deficits and problems to one balanced by an emphasis on client strengths and a belief in the capacity for growth (Blundo, 2001, Saleebey, 2000, Saleebey, 2004). Operating from a strengths perspective represents a shift in social work as practitioners are expected to assess past successes, look for exceptions to problems and locate resources within clients and their communities (De Jong and Berg, 2008, Graybeal, 2001). Strengths-based practice is relational. It occurs in the context of partnerships formed between clients and social workers (Bertolino, 2010, Brun and Rapp, 2001, Early and GlenMaye, 2000). It also looks to natural occurring connections within social networks in families and communities for the support needed to help clients accomplish their goals (Kisthardt, 2009, Saleebey, 2004).
Strengths-based practice is hopeful about the possibilities that dwell within clients and their communities (Saleebey, 2000, Saleebey, 2004). It acknowledges the promise of resilience and the ability to rebound from adversity strengthened (Benard, 2006, Lietz, 2007, Thomas et al., 2005, Walsh, 2002). This practice perspective seeks to empower individuals, families and communities to identify their own goals and move forward in ways that honor cultural preferences (Green et al., 2005, Saleebey, 2000). Essentially, strengths-based practice is hopeful, empowering, relational and responsive.
Applications of strengths-based principles can be seen in family practice settings (Dunst and Trivette, 2009, Early and GlenMaye, 2000, Walsh, 2002) and in the development of some specific clinical models such as the Solution-Focused approach (De Jong & Berg, 2008). Principles of the strengths perspective are apparent in new approaches addressing chemical dependency (Moxley and Washington, 2001, van Wormer and Davis, 2003), and in case management within mental health (Rapp & Gosha, 2006). Similarly, Family Centered Practice (FCP) represents a strengths-based approach to practice within child welfare (Allen and Petr, 1996, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau. (2007)).
There is little question that the strengths perspective has impacted the way social workers think about practice. However, what is unclear is whether this perspective has actually changed or impacted practice. Rapp, Saleebey, and Sullivan (2005) assert “since the strengths model gained currency, many people are claiming they are ‘doing strengths’” (p. 81). However, there remains a concern that practice claiming to be “strengths-based” often represents a cursory implementation of the idea of strength building rather than demonstrating a true understanding of and adherence to the core hallmarks to this approach (Rapp et al., 2005).
The purpose of this article is to describe a research project that examined whether social work practice demonstrates the guidelines established through the strengths perspective in one particular practice setting. Specifically, the project examined whether the principles of Family Centered Practice (FCP), a strengths-based approach to child welfare, were evident in families' descriptions of the in-home services they received.
Section snippets
Background
A mixed methods study was completed in 2008 to examine the impact of Intensive Family Preservation Services (IFPS) from the perspective of service recipients (Lietz, 2009). Years of research exploring family preservation have produced inconsistent findings with some studies demonstrating effectiveness while others fail to indicate positive outcomes (Bagdasaryan, 2005, Cash and Berry, 2003, Fraser et al., 1997, Littell and Schuerman, 2002, Nelson et al., 2009). Similar to previous research
Findings
This research sought to examine whether the principles of FCP were illustrated in the in-depth qualitative descriptions of services provided by parents who participated in IFPS. Essentially, the findings were inconsistent. In some cases, parent perceptions of services were suggestive of FCP. In other cases, contrasting perceptions were evident. Specifically, 14 cases contained meaning units suggesting these families perceived the principles of FCP were illustrated in their intensive in-home
Discussion
These findings suggest that for this sample, families' descriptions of intensive in-home services offered mixed illustrations of the principles of FCP. Many families described services as respectful, empowering, responsive and relational. In these cases, parents expressed their gratitude for the services and specifically to the service providers who were instrumental to their ability to regain stability within their families. It was not uncommon for these families to name their workers, wanting
Implications
Despite these limitations, these preliminary findings offer important implications for social work practice. Understanding that the perceptions of parents were inconsistent with FCP principles may suggest that state agencies consider being more deliberate in their communication with contract providers of IFPS regarding practice principles. Once expectations regarding practice principles are clear, efforts should be made to evaluate both procedural and theoretical adherence to these principles.
Conclusion
This study involved a secondary data analysis of in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with parents to discuss their impressions of IFPS. The research sought to examine the theoretical adherence to FCP principles, a strengths-based approach to child welfare practice. Findings suggest that while some families did perceive an illustration of these important practice principles, almost half the families' descriptions of services were not indicative of theoretical adherence. Despite
Acknowledgement
This project was supported by Arizona's Division of Children, Youth and Families.
References (43)
Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness
Children and Youth Services Review
(2005)- et al.
Implementation fidelity of team decisionmaking
Children and Youth Service Review
(2009) Consumer and worker perceptions of key child welfare competencies
Children and Youth Services Review
(1996)Parental experience of child protection intervention: A qualitative study
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2006)Do intensive in-home services work? A mixed methods study exploring the perspectives of service recipients
Children and Youth Services Review
(2009)- et al.
What works best for whom? A closer look at intensive family preservation services
Child & Youth Services
(2002) - et al.
Toward developing standards and measurements for family-centered practice in family support programs
Research review: Parents' service experience – a missing element in research on foster care case outcomes
Child and Family Social Work
(2005)Using strengths-based practice to tap the resilience of families
Strengths-based engagement and practice
(2010)
Translating principles into practice: Implementing the feminist and strengths perspective in work with battered women
Affilia
Learning strengths-based practice: Challenging our personal and professional frames
Families in Society
Strengths-based case management: Individuals' perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationship
Social Work
Adherence to wraparound principles and association with outcomes
Journal of Child and Family Studies
The impact of family preservation services on child and family well-being
Journal of Social Service Research
The voices of parents: A qualitative study of a family preservation program
Child & Youth Care Forum
Analyzing qualitative data
Interviewing for solutions
Capacity-building family-systems intervention practices
Journal of Family Social Work
Valuing families: Social work practice with families from a strengths perspective
Social Work
Effectiveness of family preservation services
Social Work Research
Cited by (55)
How early interventionists support families experiencing vulnerable circumstances: A closer look at family-centered practice
2023, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :FCPs may also be beneficial to the community, given the potential cost savings to the state (Hajizadeh et al., 2017). Despite the consensus of the importance of family-centered early intervention for all families (Bruder & Dunst, 2005), EI services have been described in ways that were theoretically incongruent with the tenets of family centeredness (Fleming et al., 2011; Lietz, 2011) and limited research exists about the FCPs used in Part C EI. The purpose of this study was to explore the FCPs reported by EI providers when working with families experiencing vulnerability in one northeastern state.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a solution-focused intervention in child protection services
2022, Children and Youth Services ReviewRacial disparities in the proportion of needed services maltreated children received
2018, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :One study showed above 30% of parents to have experienced this (D'Andrade & Chambers, 2012). Such a finding supports the argument that many parents working with the child welfare system lack a collaborative working relationship with a caseworker (Lietz, 2011; Staudt, Scheuler-Whitaker, & Hinterlong, 2001). Collaborative parent–caseworker relationships are built on positive, responsive interactions with families in the effort to address identified needs (Jolles & Wells, 2017; Lietz, 2011).
Family engagement in the child welfare system: A scoping review
2018, Children and Youth Services ReviewRealizing the potential of a strengths-based approach in family support with young people and their parents
2023, Child and Family Social WorkThe Language We Use: Providers’ Perceptions About Families
2022, Early Childhood Education Journal