Elsevier

Child Abuse & Neglect

Volume 73, November 2017, Pages 63-70
Child Abuse & Neglect

Full length article
Assessing the links between punitive parenting, peer deviance, social isolation and bullying perpetration and victimization in South Korean adolescents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Children who are abused at home are at an increased risk of bullying perpetration and bullying victimization. Within that context, the purpose of the present study was to test Agnew’s general strain theory and the peer deviancy training hypothesis by utilizing structural equation modeling to empirically examine pathways linking punitive parenting to bullying perpetration and bullying victimization. This study adds to the literature in two important ways. First, potential mediating linkages between punitive parenting and bullying perpetration and bullying victimization were examined, including socially withdrawn behavior and deviant peer affiliation. Second, these relationships were considered in a longitudinal sample of South Korean adolescents, which is a novel examination given that parenting in South Korea is guided largely by Confucianism which reinforces parental control, restrictiveness, and a punitive nature. Results indicate that: (1) punitive parenting is directly related to bullying perpetration but not bullying victimization; (2) punitive parenting was found to have indirect effects only on bullying perpetration; (3) deviant peer affiliation increased the likelihood of bullying perpetration and victimization; and (4) socially withdrawn behavior only affected bullying perpetration via its effect on deviant peer affiliation.

Introduction

Since the publication and dissemination of Olweus’ (1978) research on bullying, there has been a growing amount of research interest on the subject (Smith, Cowie, Olafsson, & Liefooghe, 2002). Bullying has been widely defined in Western societies as a type of aggressive behavior, which is exhibited repeatedly towards a target who is unable to defend themselves (Olweus, 1999). Spreading from Western societies, research on this phenomenon has reached an international dimension (Smith et al., 1999). In South Korea, bullying is primarily conceptualized as jipdan-ttadolim (isolation by a group), jipdan-goeropim (harassed by a group), hakgyo pongnyeok (school violence), or wang-tta (bullied individual; Lee, Smith, & Monks, 2011). Over the years, scholars in South Korea have examined several antecedents that might increase the likelihood of some adolescents to be involved in school bullying, as either victims or perpetrators, with parenting style being one of the most frequently identified. The aim of the present study is to investigate both direct and indirect links between punitive parenting and adolescents’ involvement in bullying in South Korea.

Unlike the case in most traditional Western countries, parenting styles in South Korea, as influenced by the traditional culture of Confucianism, are characterized as punitive (Park & Ko, 2004). There is a growing consensus that children who are physically or verbally abused have a heightened risk of bullying (Dussich & Maekoya, 2007; Holt, Kantor, & Finkelhor, 2008; Wolfe, Crooks, Chiodo, & Jaffe, 2009). In South Korea, study findings also reveal that punitive parenting is positively related to children’s aggressive behaviors and involvement in bullying victimization (Choi, 2014, Doh and Kim, 2007; Hwang, Doh, & Shin, 2008; Park & Chae, 2011; Roh & Sim,2004).

Parenting has a profound impact on adolescent development, behavior, and socialization outside the home (Brown, Mounts, Lamborn, & Steinberg, 1993; Engels, Dekovic, & Meeus, 2002), and adolescents tend to observe and model the behavior and socialization of their parents in the home (see Bandura, 1977). Explanations of the link between punitive parenting and adolescents’ peer relations have been primarily derived from social learning theory or social control theory (Hollist, Hughes, & Schaible, 2009). Social learning theory postulates that after observing or experiencing abusive or aggressive behavior in the home or among peers, abused children may model such behavior when interacting with their peers (Bandura, 1977). Social control theory hypothesizes that adolescents’ involvement in bullying may emerge when their bonds or ties to social institutions (e.g., family) are diminished (Pittaro, 2007).

More recently, scholars have also begun to explore the relevance of s (1992, 2006); s (1992, 2006) general strain theory (GST) in understanding the link between punitive parenting and adolescents’ involvement in bullying. Unlike earlier macro-based strain theories, GST is a social-psychological theory, which explains certain behaviors as a response to negative emotions that are elicited by adverse experiences or relationships (Hollist et al., 2009). GST proposes that exposure to negative relationships or circumstances (e.g., punitive parenting, parent-adolescent conflict) has the potential to produce negative emotional reactions (e.g., depression, anger), which can increase the risk of involvement in peer conflicts. Antisocial involvement or victimization may be outcomes of pressures or strains that are reinforced by negative interpersonal relations or negative experiences (Jang, Song, & Kim, 2014).

In addition, the peer deviance training hypothesis can shed light on the association between punitive parenting and adolescents’ involvement in bullying. Deviancy training refers to social processes, which occur in peer interactions, that can influence subsequent involvement in antisocial behavior (Dishion, Spraklen, Andrews, & Patterson, 1996). Derived from social learning research, deviancy training occurs when adolescents affiliate with deviant and antisocial peers and hold discussions that positively respond to rule breaking and delinquent behaviors (e.g., involvement in bullying; Levesque, 2011). Adolescents who are exposed to a negative home environment are unlikely to form secure attachment relationships with their caregivers. Consequently, they may learn to behave in ways that increase their risk of developing relationships with peers who engage in deviant activities (Cicchetti, Lynch, Shonk, & Manly, 1992), subsequently increasing the risk of bullying involvement (Mouttapa, Valente, Gallaher, Rohrbach, & Unger, 2004; Poulin, Dishion, & Burraston, 2001; Weiss et al., 2005).

Using a nationally representative sample of adolescents from South Korea, and informed by the theoretical insights of GST and the peer deviance training hypothesis, the present study uses structural equation modeling to examine some of the potential pathways linking punitive parenting to bullying perpetration and victimization. To further our understanding of the link between punitive parenting and adolescents’ bullying and victimization, we examine this association through the mediating roles of socially withdrawn behavior and deviant peer affiliation, controlling for age, sex, and family socioeconomic status.

Section snippets

Parenting and its link to involvement in bullying in South Korea

A significant body of research in South Korea has examined the relevance of parenting in children and adolescents’ involvement in bullying over the years. Despite rapid industrialization and globalization, parenting practices in South Korea remain guided by Confucianism, which reinforces parental control, restrictiveness, and punitiveness (Chao & Tseng, 2002). A growing body of research in South Korea has found that the quality of parenting practices is significantly related to adolescents’

Sample and procedure

Data were derived from the Korea Children and Youth Panel Study (KCYPS), a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of South Korean adolescents. Data were collected by the National Youth Policy Institute, which was sponsored by the South Korean government. The KCYPS is an annual longitudinal panel survey conducted since 2010 that utilizes proportional systematic stratified cluster sampling to select a representative sample of students in South Korea. The 78 middle schools

Descriptive statistics

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. Among the 2,168 adolescents, 52.4% were male and 47.6% were female, and the mean age was 10.94 years old (SD = 0.23, range 10–11). The mean for the family socioeconomic status was 4.23 (SD = 2.19, range 1–7). The mean for the punitive parenting was 7.06 (SD = 2.58, range 4–16), for bullying perpetration it was 0.09 (SD = 0.43, range 0–6), for bullying victimization it was 0.13 (SD = 0.49, range 0–5) and for deviant peer

Discussion

Informed by General Strain Theory and the peer deviancy training hypothesis, the aim of the present study was to examine the relationships between punitive parenting and bullying perpetration and bullying victimization. The study also examined the extent to which either, neither, or both socially withdrawn behavior and deviant peer affiliation mediated that relationship in a longitudinal sample of South Korean adolescents. Unlike past research, which suggested that parenting was associated with

References (65)

  • P.M. Bentler

    Comparative fit indexes in structural models

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1990)
  • B.B. Brown et al.

    Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence

    Child Development

    (1993)
  • R.K. Brunson et al.

    Girls and gangs

  • R. Chao et al.

    Parenting of asians

  • I. Choi

    The effects of preschool children’s language ability, emotion regulation, and mothers’ parenting behavior on peer competence and aggressive behavior

    Journal of Korean Home Management Association

    (2014)
  • D. Cicchetti et al.

    An organizational perspective on peer relationships in maltreated children

  • P.M. Crittenden et al.

    Child maltreatment and attachment theory

  • E.J. Dill et al.

    Negative affect in victimized children: The role of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and attitudes toward bullying

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2004)
  • H.S. Doh et al.

    Correlates of peer victimization in boys and girls: Maternal parenting and children’s self-esteem

    Journal of Korean Home Management Association

    (2007)
  • J.P.J. Dussich et al.

    Physical child harm and bullying-related behaviors: A comparative study in Japan, South Africa, and the United States

    International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

    (2007)
  • G. Elliott et al.

    Child physical abuse and self-perceived social isolation among adolescents

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (2006)
  • R.C.M.E. Engels et al.

    Parenting practices, social skills and peer relationships in adolescence

    Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal

    (2002)
  • D.L. Espelage et al.

    Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence

    Child Development

    (2003)
  • D.M. Fergusson et al.

    Prospective childhood predictors of deviant peer affiliations in adolescence

    The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

    (1999)
  • E.H. Ha

    A validation study of the Korean youth self-report (K-YSR)

    Journal of Child Study

    (2005)
  • M.K. Holt et al.

    Parent/child concordance about bullying involvement and family characteristics related to bullying and peer victimization

    Journal of School Violence

    (2008)
  • L. Hu et al.

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (1999)
  • M.Y. Huh

    The study for the development and validation of an inventory for parenting behavior perceived by adolescents

    Korean Adolescents Counselling Research

    (2004)
  • E.Y. Hwang et al.

    Marital conflict, maternal parenting behavior, and children’s friendship quality as a function of bully/victim groups

    Han’guk Gajeong Gwalli Hakhoeji

    (2008)
  • J.Y. Kim et al.

    Bully-victims and their depression, aggression, self-control and experience of domestic violence

    Journal of School Social Work

    (2015)
  • J.N. Kingery et al.

    Peer experiences of anxious and socially withdrawn youth: An integrative review of the developmental and clinical literature

    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

    (2010)
  • R.B. Kline

    Structural equation modeling

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text