Multiple Service Use: The impact of consistency in service quality for vulnerable youth
Introduction
Little attention has been given to the combined impact of interventions from multiple service systems (e.g., child welfare, mental health, special education, juvenile corrections) on vulnerable youth despite the fact that youth with the most complex needs and the highest risks are typically clients of more than one service system (Ungar, Liebenberg, Dudding, Armstrong, & Van de Vijver, 2013). Berzin (2010) makes a case for more attention to be paid to the complex nature of the transition through adolescence for youth who are clients in multiple service systems. She also argues for research that reaches “beyond system classifications toward broader definitions of risk that more adequately portray youth experience” (p. 487). Others have drawn attention to the fact that youth concurrently involved in more than one service system face heightened risks across a broad spectrum of developmental outcomes and generally do not achieve better outcomes despite the larger volume of services they receive (Garland et al., 2003, Haapasalo, 2000, Harpaz-Rotem et al., 2008, Hazen et al., 2004, Kroll et al., 2002, Loeber et al., 1998).
It is not clear whether multiple system involvement enhances outcomes for youth who face significant levels of risk or makes it more difficult for them to chart a safe course through adolescence and into adulthood. The present study investigates the connection between the quality of service experiences within and across service systems and levels of risk, resilience, and outcomes taking account of the role of ecological variables (such as the neighborhood and family environment), history of abuse and neglect, and chronic need.
Section snippets
Ecological theory and service delivery
Ecological theories posit that protective resources in one area can offset the impact of risks in other areas (Bronfenbrenner, 1977). In this regard, service involvement is potentially a developmental asset available to vulnerable youth, possibly mitigating these risks and enhancing youth capacity to achieve good outcomes (Gilligan, 2004, Mitchell, 2011). It could be argued that the greater the number of services involved in vulnerable lives, the better the outcomes are likely to be. However,
Sample
This analysis focuses upon youth recruited into an international study of risk, resilience, and service utilization. The research was approved by the University Ethics Review Board prior to data collection. Data were gathered during 2009 and 2010 (n = 1,494). Six hundred and five youth included in this analysis were purposefully selected through referrals from service providers who knew youth to be concurrent clients of two or more service systems (child welfare, juvenile corrections, education
Results
As can be seen from Table 4a, Table 4b, the four service experience groups were similar to each other on demographic characteristics (age, gender, and ethnicity) but differed in terms of their living arrangements. Youth in the negative service experience group reported higher than expected rates of living in either residential care settings (27% compared with 7.7% overall) or independently (6.2% compared with 3.6% overall), while youth in the MCG reported higher rates of living with family,
Discussion
Consistency in service quality measured the extent to which two service providers worked in empowering and respectful ways with youth, taking active account of cultural identity, family circumstances and values, and encouraging active involvement of youth in solving the issues or challenges they were confronting (i.e., encouraging youth agency). The measure was based on the theoretical position that when youth are actively involved in service delivery, able to form positive relationships with
Conclusion
Youth with complex needs and who face high levels of risk typically have many service providers involved in their lives (Garland et al., 2003, Hazen et al., 2004, Loeber et al., 1998, Haapasalo, 2000, Harpaz-Rotem et al., 2008, Kroll et al., 2002). The nature of contemporary service delivery means that providers usually focus on a relatively narrow scope of practice defined by their organizational and professional mandate (Berzin, 2010). In this way, each provider targets a particular aspect of
Acknowledgements
The authors thank The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment for funding this research programme. They also gratefully thank all the young people and their supporters who participated in the research. Finally they acknowledge the contribution of The Donald Beasley Institute, The Victoria University Research Trust and its staff, Youthline Auckland and all the other researchers who helped with the research.
References (34)
- et al.
Sierra Leone's former child soldiers: A follow-up study of psychosocial adjustment and community reintegration
Child Development
(2010) Vulnerability in the transition to adulthood: Defining risk based on youth profiles
Children and Youth Services Review
(2010)Toward an experimental ecology of human development
American Psychologist
(1977)- et al.
The costs and effects of addressing the needs of vulnerable populations: Results of 10 years of research
Canadian Journal of Nursing Research
(2001) A developmental psychopathology perspective on bipolar disorder
- et al.
The Satisfaction with Life Scale
Journal of Personality Assessment
(1985) - et al.
Community-level prevention of child maltreatment: The Durham Family Initiative
- et al.
Predictors of resilience in abused and neglected children grown-up: The role of individual and neighborhood characteristics
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2007) - et al.
The heroic client
(2004) - et al.
Diagnostic profiles associated with use of mental health and substance abuse services among high-risk youths
Psychiatric Services
(2003)
Promoting resilience in child and family social work: Issues for social work practice, education and policy
Social Work Education
The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Young offenders’ experiences of child protection services
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Out-of-home placement of children exposed to violence
Children & Society
Use of mental health services by youths in public sectors of care
Mental Health Services Research
Mental health needs of boys in secure care for serious or persistent offending: A prospective, longitudinal study
The Lancet
Cited by (24)
Working together to improve the mental health of indigenous children: A systematic review
2019, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :When it comes to prevention and treatment of mental illness, responsibility thus rests not only with PHC, but also with schools, specialist mental health, child welfare and juvenile justice services (Burns et al., 1995). Canadian and New Zealand studies found that adolescent users who experienced such services as respectful, empowering, and encouraging of their agency had improved resilience and wellbeing; those that had negative or inconsistent experiences did not (Sanders, Munford, Liebenberg, & Ungar, 2014; Ungar et al., 2013). Conditions that enable the integration of services across sectors include: the availability of funding and willingness to share resources; a broad focus that includes individual, family, organizational and community levels; shared organizational goals and understandings of the problem; and trained staff with clearly defined responsibilities (Fawcett, Schultz, Watson-Thompson, Fox, & Bremby, 2010; Heyeres, McCalman, Tsey, & Kinchin, 2016).
Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action
2018, Children and Youth Services ReviewPositive youth development practices and better outcomes for high risk youth
2017, Child Abuse and NeglectCitation Excerpt :What roles do risks and resilience play over time in better outcomes for youth? Based on prior research (Munford & Sanders, 2015; Sanders et al., 2014; Sanders & Munford, 2014), six hypotheses guided the analysis: Both individual and contextual risks will undermine resilience over time;
A positive youth development measure of service use satisfaction for youth: The 13-item youth services satisfaction (YSS-13)
2016, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Additionally, we do not know whether services used prior to the survey, or subsequently, also influenced the outcome variable. While previous findings underscore the interaction of PYD practices by multiple agencies and youth outcomes (Sanders, Munford, Liebenberg & Ungar, 2014c), lending support to the findings presented here, additional investigations into the interactions between high levels of risk, youth social contexts and effective service responses is necessary. Similarly, all measures used in the assessment of validity and reliability of the YSS-13 are based on self-reports.
The role of teachers in building resilience of at risk youth
2016, International Journal of Educational ResearchCitation Excerpt :In this regard, positive school relationships can be seen as critical resilience resources for youth who confront high levels of risks outside of school. Thought of in this way, school ecologies can be argued to contain rich and numerous opportunities for resilience-building and resilience-enhancing interactions with children who are vulnerable to poor outcomes (Noltemeyer & Bush, 2013; Sanders, Munford, Liebenberg, & Ungar, 2013; Sanders & Munford, 2014). The current study is concerned with understanding more about the way in which resilience moderates risks and thus creates the potential for students who face high risks to achieve better outcomes.
Education services and resilience processes: Resilient Black South African students' experiences
2014, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Skovdal and Belton (2014) questioned how social conditions shape the use and usefulness of service provision when children are HIV-affected, and subsequently edited a special journal issue devoted to answering this question. Likewise, the authors of this article began to wonder whether formal services would even emerge as a pathway of positive adjustment should there be no specific enquiry into how services impact resilience, as in the studies by Liebenberg et al. (in press), Liebenberg and Ungar (2014), Sanders, Munford, Liebenberg, and Ungar (2014), Ungar et al. (2013), and Van Rensburg et al. (2013). Thus, for the purposes of this article, the following questions were formulated: (i) Do resilient Black South African students, who are/were members of disadvantaged life-worlds, spontaneously include lived experiences of formal service provision in accounts of what supported their resilience processes during childhood and adolescence, and if yes, which formal services are foregrounded? (