Elsevier

Child Abuse & Neglect

Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2009, Pages 598-611
Child Abuse & Neglect

Associations between intensity of child welfare involvement and child development among young children in child welfare

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To examine developmental and behavioral status of children in child welfare (CW) over time, by intensity of CW involvement using a national probability sample.

Methods

As part of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW), data were collected on 1,049 children 12–47 months old investigated by CW agencies for possible abuse or neglect. Analyses used descriptive statistics to characterize developmental and behavioral status across four domains (developmental/cognitive, language, adaptive functioning, and behavior) by intensity of CW involvement (in-home with CW services, in-home with no CW services or out-of-home care) over time. Multivariate analyses were used to examine the relationship between independent variables (age, gender, home environment, race/ethnicity, maltreatment history, intensity of CW involvement) and follow-up domain scores.

Results

On average, children improved in developmental/cognitive, communication/language status over time, but these improvements did not differ by intensity of CW involvement. Analyses revealed a positive relationship between the home environment and change in language and adaptive behavior standard scores over time, and few predictors of change in behavioral status. An interaction between intensity of CW involvement and initial developmental/cognitive status was present.

Conclusions

Across domains, intensity of CW involvement does not appear to have a significant effect on change in developmental and behavioral status, although out-of-home care does have differential relationships with children's developmental/cognitive status for those with very low initial cognitive/developmental status. Facilitating development in children in CW may require supportive, enriched care environments both for children remaining at home and those in foster care.

Practice implications

Toddler and preschool age children known to child welfare are likely to have difficulties with development whether they are removed from their homes or not. It would be helpful if child welfare workers were trained to screen for developmental, language, adaptive behavior and behavioral difficulties in children in foster care, and those remaining at home. Additional support for biological, foster, and kinship caregivers in encouraging development is important for the attainment of critical developmental skills, especially for children with developmental difficulties.

Section snippets

Method

The National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW), the first national longitudinal study of its kind, was designed to examine the experiences of children and families involved with CW. The NSCAW used a two stage national probability sampling strategy to select a total of 100 primary sampling units (PSUs) representing CW agencies, and then eligible children within those PSUs. PSUs were typically defined as geographic areas that encompass the population served by a single CW agency

Procedures

After sampling, study representatives contacted caregivers and asked permission to interview them about the children in their care and to assess the child directly. Baseline (BL; Wave 1 of NSCAW) interviews were conducted an average of 5.9 months (90% of interviews in the range of 2.5–10 months) after onset of the CW investigation to help assure that the immediate upheaval of changing placements or taking part in the investigation would be less likely to affect scores on the standardized

Sample characteristics

Table 1 presents information regarding children's age, gender, race/ethnicity, maltreatment history, caregiver education, prior CW involvement, HOME-SF scores and caregiver income stratified by intensity of CW involvement. For all tables standard deviations are used for standardized assessments to facilitate understanding of effect sizes. Standard deviations are also utilized for other continuously distributed variables utilized in multivariate models. Standard errors are presented for all

Discussion

As children come into contact with CW, important decisions are made regarding appropriate intensity of CW involvement. Developmental issues are an increasing policy concern in this population. Results from this nationally representative sample provide information regarding the relationship between intensity of CW involvement and patterns of developmental change in young children (ages 12–47 months) referred to CW. Main findings include: (1) few differences between intensity of CW involvement

References (52)

  • T.M. Achenbach et al.

    Empirically based assessment of the behavioral/emotional problems of 2- and 3-year-old children

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1987)
  • Administration for Children and Families, C. B. (2006). Child Maltreatment 2006: Reports from the States to the...
  • P.C. Baker et al.

    NLSY child handbook: Revised edition: A guide to the 1986–1990 NLSY child data

    (1993)
  • D. Barnett et al.

    Defining child maltreatment: The interface between policy and research

  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Regression towards the mean

    British Medical Journal

    (1994)
  • R.H. Bradley et al.

    The relation of infants’ home environments to achievement test performance in first grade: A follow-up study

    Child Development

    (1984)
  • F.A. Campbell et al.

    Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families

    Child Development

    (1994)
  • W.J. Coster et al.

    Communicative functioning in maltreated toddlers

    Developmental Psychology

    (1989)
  • K. Dowd et al.

    National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW): Wave 1 data file users manual

    (2002)
  • B. Egeland et al.

    Attachment and early maltreatment

    Child Development

    (1981)
  • English, D. J., & the LONGSCAN Investigators. (1997). Modified Maltreatment Classification System (MMCS). For more...
  • I.O. Ertem et al.

    Development of a supplement to the HOME Scale for children living in impoverished urban environments

    Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

    (1997)
  • D. Fanshel et al.

    Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation

    (1978)
  • L.R. First et al.

    The infant or young child with developmental delay

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1994)
  • P.A. Fisher et al.

    Early intervention foster care: A model for preventing risk in young children who have been maltreated

    Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, & Practice

    (1999)
  • E.L. Grigorenko et al.

    Assessing cognitive development in early childhood

    (1999)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Mediating effects of early childhood programs and high quality home environments on the cognitive development of poor children involved in the child welfare system

      2021, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      The developmental risks associated with early childhood adversities have prompted many researchers to examine protective factors which reduce the effects of harmful experiences and enrich child development. Results of extensive research point to the potential mediating roles of early childhood education (ECE) programs (Anderson et al., 2003; Cuhna & Heckman, 2010; Heckman, 2008, 2011; Zhai, Waldfogel, & Brooks-Gunn, 2013) and high-quality home environments in reducing the harmful influence of early childhood adversities (Brooks-Gunn & Duncan, 1997; Center on the Developing Child, 2012; Collins, Maccoby, Steinberg, Hetherington, & Bornstein, 2000; Stahmer et al., 2009). Studies have shown that poverty is strongly related to the cognitive development of children, which in turn affects children’s educational outcomes, school completion, social-behavioral health, and socioeconomic status later in adulthood (Brooks-Gunn & Duncan, 1997; Kagan, 2009; Magnuson, 2013).

    • Special Education

      2020, Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The Caring for Children in Child Welfare project (CCCW) is a collaborative effort between the Child and Adolescent Services Research Center (CASRC) at Children's Hospital San Diego, the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh), the Columbus Children's Hospital, the Services Effectiveness Research Program at Duke University (Duke), and the Research Triangle Institute (RTI). The study is jointly funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH59672) and by the Administration on Children and Families (90PH0006). A complete description of the study and a list of key personnel are available at http://www.casrc.org/projects/CCCW/index.htm. It should be noted that this document also includes data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW), which was developed under contract to RTI from the Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (ACYF/DHHS). The CCCW also maintains ongoing collaboration with the NSCAW Research Group. The information and opinions expressed herein reflect solely the position of the author(s). Nothing herein should be construed to indicate the support or endorsement of its content by ACYF/DHHS.

    View full text