The profile and progress of neglected and abused children in long-term foster care☆
Introduction
Relatively little is known about the experiences of foster children according to the reasons for which they entered care. However, there is every reason to suspect that these experiences may well differ, if only because of differences in the profile of children experiencing the different forms of maltreatment. Around the world, physical abuse is more likely to be experienced by boys, for example (AIHW, 2005, Sobsey et al., 1997, Thompson et al., 2004), while sexual abuse is much more likely to be perpetrated against girls (Carmody and Carrington, 2000, Cook et al., 2001), and neglect is more prevalent in young children (AIHW, 2005, USDHHS, 2005). In spite of such potentially important individual differences, much of the available research collapses across maltreatment type for the purpose of statistical analysis (cf. Baird and Wagner, 2000, Cicchetti, 1994, English and Graham, 2000). As Garland, Landsverk, Hough, and Ellis-MacLeod (1996) have found, however, maltreatment types differ in their pattern of mental health service, which may suggest that maltreatment types differ in their level of psychosocial adjustment while in care. In their study, Garland et al. (1996) extracted information from case files and interviewed the caregivers of nearly 700 foster children and found that children in care for reasons of sexual or physical abuse were much more likely to receive mental health services than were neglected children even after controlling for level of emotional disturbance. The authors speculated that this finding could be due to differences in the behavioral expression of emotional disorder, with physically and sexually abused children being more prone to aggressive outbursts than neglected children. The present study sought to clarify the relationship between maltreatment type and emotional and behavioral disorder over time in care.
In addition to psychosocial functioning, the present study also examined the relationship between type of maltreatment and family functioning, as reflected in patterns of parental visiting and family reunification. Whereas Courtney (1994), and Courtney and Wong (1996) have found that, overall, children placed for reasons of neglect are more likely to be reunified than children placed because of abuse, a logistic regression study by Davis, Landsverk, Newton, and Ganger (1996) reported that children in care because of sexual abuse were 2.5 times more likely to be reunified than children in care for other forms of maltreatment, including neglect. This same study also found that the single best predictor of reunification was maternal visiting. Visited children were roughly 10 times more likely to be reunified than non-visited children. Adding to the confusion, Courtney and Wong's (1996) hazard function analysis of over eight-and-a-half thousand children in substitute care, found that the outcome of reunification was closely associated with race and ethnicity, such that African-American children were significantly less likely to be reunified than other ethnic groups, including Caucasian and Latino populations. More recent data from the U.S. Multistate Foster Care Data Archive (cf. Wulczyn, Hislop, & Goerge, 2001) confirm that Caucasian children are more likely to be reunited, while African-American children more likely to be adopted. African Americans were also more likely still to be in care 10 years after their initial placement (Wulczyn, 2004). In the Australian context, not only are Indigenous children grossly over-represented in child protection notifications and substantiations, but there are also differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians according to type of maltreatment. Specifically, and depending on jurisdiction, Aboriginal children in Australia are between 2 and 10 times more likely to be the subjects of substantiated notifications, and the proportion of those substantiations attributable to neglect is around 50% higher than that of non-indigenous children in the nation as a whole (AIHW, 2005). In view of differences in the mix of ethnicity and maltreatment type between Australian and U.S. children, it is unclear whether there would be any association between neglect and reunification in an Australian population and, even if so, whether that association would be positive or negative.
In summary, then, the present study sought to profile neglected and non-neglected children on intake to foster care and to track the children's progress over time. In particular, the study sought to establish whether the psychosocial progress, parental contact, and/or reunification outcomes of neglected and non-neglected children differ and, if so, how these factors are related to individual differences at intake.
Section snippets
Study design
Two-hundred-and-thirty-five children referred into foster care were recruited for the study. Intake measures were obtained from the children's case files and from face-to-face interviews with their social workers. Of these children 66 were in care primarily for reasons of neglect. One year and again 2 years later, the social workers of the children remaining in care were re-administered standardized measures of the child's well-being. At 1 year follow-up, 126 (54%) of the initial cohort were
Profile at intake
Table 1 presents selected characteristics of the neglected and non-neglected children in the sample at intake. A total of 66 children (34 boys, 32 girls), representing 28% of the total, were identified at intake as having been subject to parental neglect.
This figure is considerably lower than the 42% prevalence rate of neglect within the overall population of maltreated children in South Australia (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2004), suggesting that child protection workers are
Discussion
In summary, then, neglected children in this sample were younger than non-neglected children and presumably for this reason were less likely to pose conduct problems for carers. Neglected children were also more likely than non-neglected children to have some form of physical or mental disability. Both neglected and non-neglected children displayed modest emotional gains in foster care and non-neglected children demonstrated behavioral gains as well. Neglected children were more likely to be
References (24)
- et al.
The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems
Children and Youth Services Review
(2000) - et al.
Intrapersonal versus peer group predictors of adolescent drug use
Children and Youth Services Review
(1999) - et al.
Comparing the timing of exits from substitute care
Children and Youth Services Review
(1996) - et al.
Parental visiting and foster care reunification
Children and Youth Services Review
(1996) - et al.
An examination of relationships between children's protective services social worker assessment of risk and independent LONGSCAN measures of risk constructs
Children and Youth Services Review
(2000) Pathways in substitute care: Representation of placement careers of children using event history analysis
Children and Youth Services Review
(1999)- et al.
Type of maltreatment as a predictor of mental health service use of children in foster care
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1996) - Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1998). Population by Age and Sex. South Australia. Canberra: Author (ABS catalogue...
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2004). Child Protection Australia, 2002-03. Canberra:...
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2005). Child Protection Australia, 2003-04. Canberra:...
Age and gender differences in the predictors of adolescent drinking
Social Work Research
The predictors of adolescent smoking
Journal of Social Services Research
Cited by (23)
Parental poverty, physical neglect and child welfare intervention: Dilemma and constraints of child welfare workers in Ghana
2021, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :The target beneficiaries of the LEAP program (elderly people and orphans) suggest that it may not be a guaranteed option for poor parents who neglect their children. Further, in some cases—such as where there is evidence of significant harm— neglected children are removed from their parents and placed in alternative care (either into foster or residential care homes) (Barber & Delfabbro, 2009; Broadhurst & Mason, 2017), and are reunified only after the parents become resourceful or are considered capable of providing adequate care and protection for the child(ren) (Fernandez et al., 2019). This is a common practice in addressing child neglect incidents in several developed countries, including Australia, New Zealand, UK, Canada and the US (Fernandez et al., 2019; Wulczyn et al., 2013).
Foster children are at risk for developing problems in social-emotional functioning: A follow-up study at 8 years of age
2020, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Several studies have shown that foster children are at higher risk for developing difficulties related to social-emotional functioning, including externalizing and internalizing problems (Goemans, van Geel, van Beem, & Vedder, 2016; Oswald, Heil, & Goldbeck, 2010), as well as psychiatric problems during childhood and adolescence (Lehmann, Havik, Havik, & Heiervang, 2013; Lehmann & Kayed, 2018). These children have typically experienced disruption in relation to their biological caregivers, as well as maltreatment prior to placement (Barber & Delfabbro, 2009; Fox, Almas, Degnan, Nelson, & Zeanah, 2011; Oswald et al., 2010). Such early care histories make foster children more vulnerable to adverse developmental pathways, including more problem behavior (Harwicke & Hochstadt, 1986; Lawrence, Carlson, & Egeland, 2006; Leslie et al., 2005; Lloyd & Barth, 2011; Pears & Fisher, 2005; Smyke, Zeanah, Fox, & Nelson, 2009).
Parental availability of support and frequency of contact: The reports of youth in educational residential care
2019, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Some studies have shown that various types of contact have different effects on children's wellbeing. For example, some studies have shown that face-to-face contact has a stronger effect on outcomes than telephone calls (Barber & Delfabbro, 2009; Robst, Rohrer, et al., 2013b). Therefore, when examining the contact children in care have with their parents, it is important to include both direct contact, including parents' visits to the care setting and children's visits home, and indirect contact, such as phone calls.
Discriminating baseline indicators for (un)favorable psychosocial development in different 24-h settings
2018, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :This is possibly due to the broad construct being used to define child maltreatment, including both physical and emotional abuse, sexual abuse, and physical or emotional neglect. The literature data state that the impact of child maltreatment on a child's development differs across the different types of maltreatment (Gilbert et al., 2009; Petrenko, Friend, Garrido, Taussig, & Culhane, 2012), in which neglect seems to generate the highest risks (Barber & Delfabbro, 2009; Spinhoven et al., 2010). Further research is needed to refine the effect of different types of maltreatment on the psychosocial development within and across the different types of out-of-home care.
Factors influencing decision making about the placement of children in care: Development of the Child Placement Questionnaire
2015, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :The vignette in the CPQ describes ‘Nathan,’ a child who has been removed from home and requires placement in out of home care, the objective being for participants to make a decision about a suitable out of home placement for Nathan. The vignette was developed based on government statistics describing children in out of home care (AIHW, 2013), and on current literature detailing the characteristics of children in kinship and foster care in Australia (Barber & Delfabbro, 2009). The objective of the vignette was to provide enough information for participants to make a decision about Nathan's placement in response to their beliefs about different placement types, rather than as a response to specific characteristics of the case.
What do child characteristics contribute to outcomes from care: A PRISMA review
2013, Children and Youth Services Review
- ☆
This work was made possible by an Australian Research Council grant to the senior author while both authors were affiliated with Flinders University. We wish to express our gratitude to both organizations.