Invited Commentary
The definition of child maltreatment: from case study to construct

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.04.002Get rights and content

Section snippets

Defining and validating operational definitions

The collective results presented in the papers in this Special Issue represent a major step forward in operationally defining child maltreatment sub-types. Most importantly the definitions as a group cover a wide range of relevant issues, some very seldom considered and certainly not considered together. The following are selected highlights of the operational definitions discussed in these papers.

Describing maltreatment (Runyan et al., 2005) compares operational definitions of maltreatment

Evaluating definitions of child maltreatment

The NRC (1993) report on child maltreatment research stated: “The formulation of research definitions of child maltreatment should be guided by four key principles: consideration of specific objectives the definition must serve; division into homogeneous sub-types; conceptual clarity; and feasibility in practice” (p. 5). These principles, described earlier by Zuravin (1991), are examined with reference to the present papers.

Specific objectives for the definition

Dimensions of maltreatment (English, Bangdiwala, & Runyan, 2005), the introductory paper, notes “… there is an emerging consensus that different types of maltreatment need to be examined separately, as each appears to have distinct antecedents and consequences” (p. 441). This suggests an objective of developing operational definitions appropriate for use in research, specifically to examine relationships between each maltreatment sub-type and its antecedents or consequents. Accomplishing this

Homogeneous sub-types

A second guiding principle suggested by the NRC (1993) report was “division into homogeneous sub-types.” What is meant by “homogeneous?” Pedhazur and Schmelkin (1991) note that: “… the internal consistency approach to the estimation of reliability is based on the notion that the items, or sub-parts, of the instrument measure the same phenomenon. Broadly speaking, this means that the items are homogeneous” (p. 92). These authors note that they use the term “broadly” because general agreement is

Conceptual clarity

A third principle proposed by NRC (1993) is conceptual clarity. This refers to there being a clear relationship between the abstract expression (the concept) and the particulars from which the abstraction is generalized. This is the question: are the behaviors identified as maltreating and the operational definitions based on them, in fact, reflective of maltreatment? Conceptual clarity involves the challenge to demonstrate validity. The papers in this issue examine the capability of “scores”

Feasible measures

The fourth NRC (1993) principle is feasibility. This is taken to mean that a conceptual definition can be operationalized so as to examine relevant behaviors that can be identified in relevant populations and the resulting data can be subjected to appropriate metric and statistical tests. For researchers, the feasibility of obtaining valid data is an ever-present challenge. The problem is to balance the relevance and quality of data obtained with problems of accessibility, including time,

Defining maltreatment sub-types as constructs

The NRC (1993) report views the accomplishment of the four principles for developing definitions of maltreatment, discussed above, as steps toward achieving a longer-range goal of relating maltreatment to relevant theoretical perspectives. The present papers give little consideration to the theory or theories that explain the anticipated negative developmental consequences of maltreatment. As a result an unanswered question is: Do the relationships that are found (or are lacking) between a

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Ellen Herrenkohl, Todd Herrenkohl, and Jean Russo for their helpful comments on this paper.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (35)

  • P. Trickett et al.

    The developmental impact of different forms of child abuse and neglect

    Developmental Review

    (1995)
  • T. Achenbach et al.

    Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile

    (1983)
  • D. Barnett et al.

    Defining child maltreatment: The interface between policy and research

  • J. Briere

    Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children: Professional manual.

    (1996)
  • D. Campbell et al.

    Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait multi-method matrix

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1959)
  • Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. (2000). Developmental processes in maltreated children. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation...
  • T. Cook et al.

    Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings

    (1979)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Decision-making on out-of-home care: The case of Flanders

      2023, Children and Youth Services Review
    • Unheard voices of children on child abuse and neglect

      2023, Children and Youth Services Review
    • Epidemiology of violence against children in migration: A systematic literature review

      2020, Child Abuse and Neglect
      Citation Excerpt :

      Children are defined as persons below the age of 18 (Article 1 of the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child); the terms “refugee” and “internally displaced person” are used in accordance with the UNICEF report Uprooted (UNICEF, 2016, p. 14). Unfortunately, there are no standard and thus no uniformly shared definitions of child maltreatment or child abuse and neglect in the multidisciplinary domain of child protection research (e.g., Herrenkohl, 2005; Jud & Voll, 2019). Meta-analyses and reviews have highlighted major variances in the prevalence of child maltreatment (Sethi, Mitis, Alink et al., 2013; Stoltenborgh, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Alink, & van IJzendoorn, 2015).

    • The recognition of child abuse and the perceived need for intervention by school personnel of primary schools: Results of a vignette study on the influence of case, school personnel, and school characteristics

      2018, Child Abuse and Neglect
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a result, behaviors labelled as CAN may change according to social structures, attitudes, values, norms, and laws. CAN likewise closely correlates with views of the child’s place in a particular society or culture, with notions on (poor) parenting and with who has the power to enforce a definition at a given point in time (Herrenkohl, 2005). All of this means that what constitutes CAN and what are the definitive signs or evidence of CAN remain the topic of an ongoing debate (O’Toole et al., 1999).

    • Harsh parenting and academic achievement in Chinese adolescents: Potential mediating roles of effortful control and classroom engagement

      2018, Journal of School Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, adequate classroom engagement is requisite for satisfactory academic achievement. With physical abuse as a common and fundamental form for both child maltreatment and harsh parenting (Giovannoni, 1989; Herrenkohl, 2005), research on child maltreatment could be drawn on to indicate the diversified risk factors engendered by harsh parenting for children's classroom engagement. Maltreated children have been shown to display more dependency and social wariness, less readiness to learn and explore (Aber, Allen, Carlson, & Cicchetti, 1989) and inadequate affect regulation (Shields & Cicchetti, 2001), in contrast to their non-maltreated counterparts.

    • Hierarchies of child maltreatment types at different perceived severity levels in European Americans, Korean Americans, and Koreans

      2014, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Making comparisons of child abuse across cultures and even across studies has been difficult because of the imprecision of definitions of abuse. The National Research Council (1993), pointing out the absence of clear operational definitions of child abuse, recommended quantifying relevant maltreatment dimensions, especially severity, rather than focusing on the simple presence or absence of maltreatment (Herrenkohl, 2005; Litrownik et al., 2005; Runyan et al., 2005). However, difficulties in defining maltreatment types and judging the severity of different forms of abuse continue to plague researchers, practitioners, and policy makers in this field (Arruabarrena & De Paúl, 2012; Herrenkohl & Herrenkohl, 2009; Litrownik et al., 2005; Sprang, Clark, & Bass, 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text