Epidemiology of Traumatic Experiences in Childhood

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2013.12.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Understanding the epidemiology of traumatic experiences in childhood is critical to conducting meaningful trauma research, developing effective trauma services and service delivery systems with the greatest reach, and efficiently allocating resources.

  • There are many serious challenges to understanding the epidemiology of childhood traumatic events, including the nature of many forms of traumatic experiences, inadequate national surveillance efforts, and conceptual and methodological differences

Traumatic event characteristics

Many forms of childhood trauma, particularly interpersonal violence, occur in private circumstances and rarely are observed by others. Frequently only perpetrators and children have knowledge of the events, and neither may want to reveal them. Offenders are fearful of the legal and social consequences if their behavior is discovered. Children often do not tell about incidents for many reasons, including being afraid of getting into trouble; a sense of stigmatization, shame, guilt, or self-blame

Inadequate surveillance efforts

For many forms of childhood trauma, there are few or inadequate ongoing national community surveillance efforts that can reveal basic prevalence, incidence, or case-characteristic trends. For example, in the United States the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is a very large (N = >90,000 households) nationally representative household victimization survey conducted annually by the US Department of Justice8 that collects information about the incidence of certain crimes among

Conceptual and methodological differences

Because of the lack of systematic, effective, and complete surveillance systems for the victimization of children and youth in the United States, most knowledge about the epidemiology of childhood violence and other traumatic events must be garnered from an essentially serendipitous collection of studies conducted for many different purposes. Because of the ad hoc nature of these studies, there is considerable variation among them regarding vital conceptual and methodological characteristics.13

Review of important literature

For the reasons already described, this review focuses on findings from methodologically rigorous studies using national samples of youth in the United States that assess the most serious forms of childhood trauma. These studies give the most generalizable estimates for the prevalence of childhood traumatic events. Findings from studies of more restricted populations carry known and unknown biases that can be misleading when applied to unrelated situations. Studies reporting prevalence

Application in clinical practice

As noted earlier, clinicians should be aware of the basic epidemiology of childhood trauma because it serves as a background for assessment, intervention selection, and service-program development. Several points from the foregoing review can be applied to clinical practice.

Tools for practice

Two tools used in some of the research described here may be useful to clinicians. Versions of the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire64 were used in the NatSCEV and NatSCEV II studies. Versions of the Event History Interview for Children & Adolescents65 were used in the NSA and the NSA-R surveys. Each can be used to conduct an assessment of the victimization history of youth. Although both are fairly long (30–40 minutes) and somewhat complicated to administer, each produces comprehensive and

Future directions

Understanding the true epidemiology of childhood traumatic experiences is challenging for many reasons, including conceptual, definitional, and methodological problems encountered. Fortunately, some of these problems are being moderated as new work incorporates the ideas and techniques of studies such as the NSA and NatSCEV series of studies. In the future, greater methodological consistency will aid in cross-study comparisons. However, new complications are emerging. A serious methodological

Summary

Over the past 2 decades, the importance of psychological trauma in response to exposure to violence and other events has emerged as a vitally important area of research and practice. Research has found that trauma exposure is a key element in child development, psychopathology, and functioning. Consequently, policy-makers, service systems, and individual professionals concerned with children are seeking to become “trauma-informed” and to implement evidence-based programs and interventions for

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (67)

  • S.R. Jaffee et al.

    Influence of adult domestic violence on children’s internalizing and externalizing problems: an environmentally informative twin study

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • K.J. Mitchell et al.

    Youth internet victimization in a broader victimization context

    J Adolesc Health

    (2011)
  • D. Finkelhor et al.

    Lifetime assessment of poly-victimization in a national sample of children and youth

    Child Abuse Negl

    (2009)
  • J.D. Ford et al.

    Poly-victimization and risk of posttraumatic, depressive, and substance use disorders and involvement in delinquency in a National Survey of Adolescents

    J Adolesc Health

    (2010)
  • D. Finkelhor et al.

    Poly-victimization: a neglected component in child victimization

    Child Abuse Negl

    (2007)
  • B.E. Saunders et al.

    Prevalence, case characteristics, and long-term psychological correlates of child rape among women: a national survey

    Child Maltreat

    (1999)
  • R.F. Hanson et al.

    Correlates of adolescent reports of sexual assault: findings from the National Survey of Adolescents

    Child Maltreat

    (2003)
  • K.J. Ruggiero et al.

    Is disclosure of childhood rape associated with mental health outcome? Results from the National Women's Study

    Child Maltreat

    (2004)
  • J. Truman et al.

    Criminal victimization, 2012

    (2013)
  • D.G. Kilpatrick et al.

    Understanding national rape statistics

    (2009)
  • C. Kruittschnitt et al.

    Estimating the incidence of rape and sexual assault: panel on measuring rape and sexual assault in Bureau of Justice Statistics household surveys

    (2013)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children,...
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Summary of the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program

    (2013)
  • D. Finkelhor

    Childhood victimization: violence, crime, and abuse in the lives of young people

    (2008)
  • J.D. Ford et al.

    History of interpersonal violence, abuse, and nonvictimization trauma and severity of psychiatric symptoms among children in outpatient psychiatric treatment

    J Interpers Violence

    (2011)
  • L.H. Jaycox et al.

    Trauma exposure and retention in adolescent substance abuse treatment

    J Trauma Stress

    (2004)
  • D.C. King et al.

    Childhood maltreatment and psychiatric disorders among detained youths

    Psychiatr Serv

    (2011)
  • E.C. Louwers et al.

    Effects of systematic screening and detection of child abuse in emergency departments

    Pediatrics

    (2012)
  • K.T. Muesser et al.

    Trauma and PTSD among adolescents with severe emotional disorders involved in multiple service systems

    Psychiatr Serv

    (2008)
  • D.J. Grasso et al.

    Patterns of multiple victimization among maltreated children in Navy families

    J Trauma Stress

    (2013)
  • L. Khoury et al.

    Substance use, childhood trauma experience, and posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban civilian population

    Depress Anxiety

    (2010)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS)

    (2003)
  • W.E. Copeland et al.

    Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress in childhood

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • Cited by (142)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have nothing to disclose.

    View full text