Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 54, January 2016, Pages 134-141
Computers in Human Behavior

Full length article
My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A valid scale of partner phubbing (Pphubbing) was developed.

  • Pphubbing was found to have a negative impact on relationship satisfaction.

  • Cell phone conflict mediated the impact of Pphubbing on relationship satisfaction.

  • Attachment style moderated the Pphubbing – cell phone conflict relationship.

  • Pphubbing was found to indirectly impact life satisfaction and depression.

Abstract

Partner phubbing (Pphubbing) can be best understood as the extent to which an individual uses or is distracted by his/her cell phone while in the company of his/her relationship partner. The present study is the first to investigate the oft-occurring behavior of Pphubbing and its impact on relationship satisfaction and personal well-being. In Study 1, a nine-item scale was developed to measure Pphubbing. The scale was found to be highly reliable and valid. Study 2 assessed the study's proposed relationships among a sample of 145 adults. Results suggest that Pphubbing's impact on relationship satisfaction is mediated by conflict over cell phone use. One's attachment style was found to moderate the Pphubbing – cell phone conflict relationship. Those with anxious attachment styles reported higher levels of cell phone conflict than those with less anxious attachment styles. Importantly, Pphubbing was found to indirectly impact depression through relationship satisfaction and ultimately life satisfaction. Given the ever-increasing use of cell phones to communicate between romantic partners, the present research offers insight into the process by which such use may impact relationship satisfaction and personal well-being. Directions for future research are discussed.

Introduction

Portmanteau (n) – a word whose form and meaning are derived from a blending together of two or more distinct words.

Phubbing is a portmanteau of the words “phone” and “snubbing”. To be phubbed is to be snubbed by someone using their cell phone when in your company. The “phubb” could be an interruption of your conversation with someone when he or she attends to their cell phone or when you are in close proximity to another but they use their cell phone instead of communicating with you. Partner phubbing (Pphubbing) is when the above takes place when in the company of your spouse or significant other. The ubiquitous nature of cell phones makes phubbing in general, or more specifically, Pphubbing a near inevitable occurrence. In fact, seventy percent of a sample of 143 females involved in romantic relationships reported that cell phones “sometimes”, “often”, “very often,” or “all the time” interfered in their interactions with their partners (McDaniel & Coyne, 2014). Other studies have found Pphubbing to be a common occurrence among romantic partners as well (Coyne, Stockdale, Busby, Iverson, & Grant, 2011; Lenhart & Duggan, 2014).

The present research investigates whether Pphubbing impacts relationship satisfaction and individual well-being. The potentially mediating impact of cell phone conflict (Coyne et al. 2011) and moderating effect of attachment style (Bowlby, 1969) are also investigated to better understand the process by which Pphubbing impacts relationship satisfaction amongst romantic partners.

The present study makes several important contributions to the current literature. First, we have built and validated a measure of Pphubbing. Valid and reliable scales are needed to advance our understanding of how technology impacts relationships. As a behavior that occurs regularly, Pphubbing should be at the forefront of any efforts to understand how cell phone use impacts romantic relationships. A second contribution is that the present study investigates how Pphubbing affects romantic relationships—an area of research that has received scant attention (McDaniel & Coyne, 2014). A third contribution is that the present study focuses on the impact of cell phone use on relationship satisfaction. To date, previous research has combined many different types of technology (television, computers, cell phones, iPads, and tablets) when investigating the impact of technology use on relationships obfuscating the unique role that any specific technology might play (Padilla-Walker, Coyne, & Fraser, 2012). A fourth contribution includes the potential mediating rule of cell phone conflict in the Pphubbing – relationship satisfaction link. Previous research suggests that it is not the time spent with technologies that impacts relationship satisfaction, but the conflict created by the technology use (Coyne et al., 2012). The present study also examines the potential moderating effect of attachment style on the Pphubbing—cell phone conflict relationship. A final contribution is that the present study investigates the impact of Pphubbing on personal well-being. Previous research suggests that cell phone use and texting can increase reported stress (Beranuy et al., 2009, Lepp et al., 2014) and unhealthy attachment to one's cell phone can increase symptoms of depression (Gentile, Coyne, & Bricolo, 2012; Harwood, Dooley, Scott, & Joiner, 2014). A sequential moderated-mediation model (Preacher & Hayes, 2008) is used to examine the hypothesized impact of Pphubbing on life satisfaction and depression.

Section snippets

Pphubbing and relationship satisfaction

Relationship and/or marital satisfaction may be best understood as, “the degree to which spouses perceive that their partners meet their needs and desires” (Peleg, 2008, p. 388). A stable and healthy relationship is seen by many as the cornerstone of happy individuals and well-adjusted families (Coyne et al., 2011). Bradbury, Fincham, and Beach (2000) identified interpersonal interactions between partners as one of several important predictors of relationship satisfaction (Ahlstrom, Lundberg,

Item development

Partner phubbing (Pphubbing) is the extent to which your romantic partner uses or is distracted by his/her cell phone while in your company. An initial item pool of over 100 items was generated to measure Pphubbing. Each author gathered items from both the academic literature and popular press sources including newspapers, magazines, and websites. Additionally, approximately thirty marketing research students were asked to generate phubbing items after being provided the above definition and

Discussion

Previous research has documented the considerable amount of time people spend interacting with technology (Harris, Harris, Carlson, & Carlson, 2015). In a sample of college students, Roberts, Petnji Ya-Ya, and Manolis (2014) found that college students spend an average of nearly 9 h daily on their cell phones. Other studies have found similarly large amounts of time spent devoted to one's cell phone (Junco & Cotton, 2012; Lenhart & Duggan, 2014). It appears that people from all age groups are

Limitations and future research directions

Although the present research serves as the first to investigate the impact of Pphubbing on relationship satisfaction and personal well-being, its results must be tempered by certain limitations. First, although the samples used were adequate size and represented a broad swath of both women and men of all ages, future research in this area would benefit from studying both partners in romantic relationships. For instance, Ahlstrom et al. (2012) found that couples where only one partner

Conclusion

The institution of marriage (and romantic relationships in general) is under attack. Approximately 40–50 percent of all marriages will end in divorce (www.apa.org/topics/divorce/), while many of the intact unions are poorly functioning and are characterized by low levels of relationship satisfaction on the part of one or both partners (Ahlstrom et al., 2012). As intimated in the title of this paper, it appears that life has become a major distraction from our cell phones. It is ironic that cell

References (69)

  • J.N. Morey et al.

    Young adults' use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2013)
  • R.S. Weisskirch et al.

    Attachment style and conflict resolution skills predicting technology use in relationship dissolution

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2013)
  • M. Ahlstrom et al.

    Me, my spouse, and my avatar

    Journal of Leisure Research

    (2012)
  • M. Ainsworth et al.

    Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation

    (1978)
  • K. Bartholomew et al.

    Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1991)
  • S.R. Beach et al.

    Depression in marriage: A model for etiology and treatment

    (1990)
  • W.O. Bearden et al.

    Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1982)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and loss

    (1969)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and loss

    (1980)
  • T.N. Bradbury et al.

    Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: a decade in review

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (2000)
  • K.A. Brennan et al.

    Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview

  • D. Carr et al.

    Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life

    Journal of Marriage and Family

    (2014)
  • J. Cassidy et al.

    Avoidance and its relationship with other defensive processes

  • N. Chesley

    Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction

    Journal of Marriage and Family

    (2005)
  • G.A. Churchill

    A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1979)
  • N.L. Collins et al.

    A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2000)
  • S.M. Coyne et al.

    Gaming in the game of love: effects of video games on conflict in couples

    Family Relations

    (2012)
  • S.M. Coyne et al.

    Media time = family time: positive media use in families with adolescents

    Journal of Adolescent Research

    (2014)
  • S.M. Coyne et al.

    I luv u :): a descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships

    Family Relations

    (2011)
  • T. Ein-Dor et al.

    Attachment insecurities and the processing of threat-related information: studying the schemas involved in insecure People's coping strategies

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2011)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1981)
  • R.C. Fraley et al.

    Patterns of stability in adult attachment: an empirical test of two models of continuity and change

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2011)
  • D.A. Gentile et al.
  • M. Griffiths

    Internet addiction: fact or fiction?

    The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society

    (1999)
  • Cited by (442)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text