Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The Heart and Soul of Health Care

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2005.01.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Definition

Interdisciplinary collaboration has been named and defined in the literature in a variety of ways. Terms used to name or describe this behavior include collaboration, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, interprofessional, and team-focused collaboration [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Several definitions for these terms also exist.

In 1972, the National Joint Practice Commission defined joint practice as nurses and physicians collaborating as colleagues to provide team-focused patient care [6]. Stout

Drivers

Although formalization of collaboration did not occur until the 1970s, efforts to optimize teamwork in primary and long-term settings dates back to 1940 [10]. Recent focus, however, has shifted to high-risk areas, such as ICUs, emergency departments (EDs), and operating rooms (ORs). Changes in health and social policy, in particular changes in management practices, have provided external drivers for interprofessional collaboration. These often have been experienced as uncomfortable pressures,

Barriers

Despite several decades of awareness of the positive impact of interdisciplinary collaboration, barriers continue to exist that prevent optimal implementation. These barriers focus on changing team structure, communication breakdown, lack of time, divergent value systems, role ambiguity, lack of skill sets, and variance in educational focus.

In ICUs, a variety of disciplines are necessary to provide complex care. A core team can be as small as two to four people. Examples of a core team are the

Solutions

Although many barriers exist, the goal of collaboration is attainable. Defining how minds actually interact in a clinical team and having a clear understanding of team structure and function are essential first steps for building successful interdisciplinary collaboration [41]. Therefore, each member should believe that collaboration results in excellent patient care with tangible benefits to patients and the collaborative partners. To achieve this, members must respect the contributions of

Summary

Interprofessional collaboration has the potential to be a catalyst for professional development [5]. To be such, collaborative team members must view the relationships from a supportive perspective. Participants have to believe that collaboration promotes excellent patient care. A mutual respect for each profession's contribution toward patient care is necessary along with willingness and desire to collaborate. Additionally, effective communication, identification of compatible and dissimilar

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (47)

  • L. Norsen et al.

    Practice model: collaborative practice

    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am

    (1995)
  • W.D. Corser

    The contemporary nurse-physician relationship: Insights from scholars outside the two professions

    Nurs Outlook

    (2000)
  • P. Mitchell et al.

    Interdisciplinary collaboration: old ideas with new urgency

    Washington Public Heath

    (2000)
  • A. Dechairo-Marino et al.

    Nurse/physician collaboration: action research and the lessons learned

    JONA

    (2001)
  • R. Stout et al.

    Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training

    Group Dyn

    (1997)
  • G. Kenny

    The importance of nursing values in interprofessional collaboration

    Br J Nurs

    (2002)
  • B. Martin et al.

    The acute care nurse practitioner in collaborative practice

    AACN Clin Issues

    (1996)
  • D. Salipante

    Developing a multidisciplinary weaning unit through collaboration

    Crit Care Nurse

    (2002)
  • M. Freeman et al.

    The impact of individual philosophies of teamwork on multiprofessional practice and the implications for education

    J Interprof Care

    (2000)
  • T. Drinka et al.

    Healthcare teamwork: interdisciplinary practice and teaching

    (2000)
  • D. Freeth

    Sustaining interprofessional collaboration

    J Interprof Care

    (2001)
  • J. Firth-Cozens

    Cultures for improving patient safety through learning: the role of teamwork

    Qual Health Care

    (2001)
  • R. Majzun

    The role of teamwork in improving patient satisfaction

    Group Practice J

    (1998)
  • J. Sexton et al.

    Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys

    BMJ

    (2000)
  • T. Risser et al.

    The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • S. Shortell et al.

    The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference?

    Med Care

    (1994)
  • J. Baggs et al.

    Nurses and resident physician's perceptions of the process of collaboration in an MICU

    Res Nurs Health

    (1997)
  • L. Hawryluck et al.

    Pulling together and pushing apart: tides of tension in the ICU team

    Acad Med

    (2002)
  • H. Coeling et al.

    Communication styles that promote perceptions of collaboration, quality, and nurse satisfaction

    J Nurs Care Qual

    (2000)
  • J. Williamson et al.

    Human failure: analysis of 2000 incident reports

    Anesth Intensive Care

    (1993)
  • A. Kaissi et al.

    Measuring teamwork and patient safety attitudes of high-risk areas

    Nurs Econ

    (2003)
  • M.F. Tracy et al.

    Creating a collaborative environment to care for complex patients and families

    AACN Clin Issues

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text